From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Curt Wohlgemuth <curtw@google.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] vfs: Avoid unnecessary WB_SYNC_NONE writeback during sys_sync and reorder sync passes
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 22:40:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1318020055-4450-7-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1318020055-4450-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz>
wakeup_flusher_threads(0) will queue work doing complete writeback for each
flusher thread. Thus there is not much point in submitting another work doing
full inode WB_SYNC_NONE writeback by writeback_inodes_sb().
After this change it does not make sense to call nonblocking ->sync_fs and
block device flush before calling sync_inodes_sb() because
wakeup_flusher_threads() is completely asynchronous and thus these functions
would be called in parallel with inode writeback running which will effectively
void any work they do. So we move sync_inodes_sb() call before these two
functions.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
fs/sync.c | 3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/sync.c b/fs/sync.c
index 7c55c5d..02ba2a5 100644
--- a/fs/sync.c
+++ b/fs/sync.c
@@ -133,10 +133,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE0(sync)
int nowait = 0, wait = 1;
wakeup_flusher_threads(0);
- iterate_supers(sync_inodes_one_sb, &nowait);
+ iterate_supers(sync_inodes_one_sb, &wait);
iterate_supers(sync_fs_one_sb, &nowait);
sync_all_bdevs(nowait);
- iterate_supers(sync_inodes_one_sb, &wait);
iterate_supers(sync_fs_one_sb, &wait);
sync_all_bdevs(wait);
if (unlikely(laptop_mode))
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-07 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-07 20:40 [PATCH 0/6] Cleanup and improve sync (v3) Jan Kara
2011-10-07 20:40 ` [PATCH 1/6] vfs: Move noop_backing_dev_info check from sync into writeback Jan Kara
2011-10-20 9:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-07 20:40 ` [PATCH 2/6] quota: Split dquot_quota_sync() to writeback and cache flushing part Jan Kara
2011-10-20 9:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-07 20:40 ` [PATCH 3/6] quota: Move quota syncing to ->sync_fs method Jan Kara
2011-10-07 20:40 ` [PATCH 4/6] vfs: Reorder operations during sys_sync Jan Kara
2011-10-20 9:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-20 23:57 ` Jan Kara
2011-10-07 20:40 ` [PATCH 5/6] vfs: Make sys_sync writeout also block device inodes Jan Kara
2011-10-20 9:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-07 20:40 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2011-10-20 9:57 ` [PATCH 6/6] vfs: Avoid unnecessary WB_SYNC_NONE writeback during sys_sync and reorder sync passes Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-24 13:14 ` Jan Kara
2011-10-18 1:07 ` [PATCH 0/6] Cleanup and improve sync (v3) Jan Kara
2011-10-18 6:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1318020055-4450-7-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=curtw@google.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).