From: Tao Ma <tm@tao.ma>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-devel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH for 3.2] fs/direct-io.c: Calculate fs_count correctly in get_more_blocks.
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:24:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1320045873-3956-1-git-send-email-tm@tao.ma> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111029105856.GA6479@infradead.org>
From: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com>
In get_more_blocks, we use dio_count to calculate fs_count and do some
tricky things to increase fs_count if dio_count isn't aligned. But
actually it still has some cornor case that can't be coverd. See the
following example:
./dio_write foo -s 1024 -w 4096(direct write 4096 bytes at offset 1024).
The same goes if the offset isn't aligned to fs_blocksize.
In this case, the old calculation counts fs_count to be 1, but actually
we will write into 2 different blocks(if fs_blocksize=4096). The old code
just works, since it will call get_block twice(and may have to allocate
and create extent twice for file systems like ext4). So we'd better call
get_block just once with the proper fs_count.
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com>
---
Christoph, this is the updated version. I have done some tests against it and
it works. And the only difference between the old and this one is the change
from dio to sdio. Thanks.
fs/direct-io.c | 11 ++++-------
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/direct-io.c b/fs/direct-io.c
index d740ab6..5582183 100644
--- a/fs/direct-io.c
+++ b/fs/direct-io.c
@@ -580,9 +580,8 @@ static int get_more_blocks(struct dio *dio, struct dio_submit *sdio,
{
int ret;
sector_t fs_startblk; /* Into file, in filesystem-sized blocks */
+ sector_t fs_endblk; /* Into file, in filesystem-sized blocks */
unsigned long fs_count; /* Number of filesystem-sized blocks */
- unsigned long dio_count;/* Number of dio_block-sized blocks */
- unsigned long blkmask;
int create;
/*
@@ -593,11 +592,9 @@ static int get_more_blocks(struct dio *dio, struct dio_submit *sdio,
if (ret == 0) {
BUG_ON(sdio->block_in_file >= sdio->final_block_in_request);
fs_startblk = sdio->block_in_file >> sdio->blkfactor;
- dio_count = sdio->final_block_in_request - sdio->block_in_file;
- fs_count = dio_count >> sdio->blkfactor;
- blkmask = (1 << sdio->blkfactor) - 1;
- if (dio_count & blkmask)
- fs_count++;
+ fs_endblk = (sdio->final_block_in_request - 1) >>
+ sdio->blkfactor;
+ fs_count = fs_endblk - fs_startblk + 1;
map_bh->b_state = 0;
map_bh->b_size = fs_count << dio->inode->i_blkbits;
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-31 7:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-28 13:30 interims VFS queue Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-28 18:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-10-28 19:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-28 19:31 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-10-28 19:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-10-28 22:09 ` Andrew Morton
2011-10-29 10:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-29 11:49 ` caching the request queue was " Andi Kleen
2011-11-02 2:47 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-30 7:36 ` Tao Ma
2011-10-31 7:24 ` Tao Ma [this message]
2011-10-31 18:12 ` [PATCH for 3.2] fs/direct-io.c: Calculate fs_count correctly in get_more_blocks Jeff Moyer
2011-11-01 3:31 ` Tao Ma
2011-11-02 2:26 ` [PATCH V2 " Tao Ma
2011-11-02 7:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-03 3:21 ` Tao Ma
2011-10-29 13:48 ` interims VFS queue Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-29 14:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-30 15:47 ` Hans Verkuil
2011-11-02 13:28 ` interims VFS queue, part2 Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1320045873-3956-1-git-send-email-tm@tao.ma \
--to=tm@tao.ma \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).