From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] dirty throttling bits for 3.3
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:44:09 +0100
Message-ID: <1322052249.14799.59.camel@twins>
References: <20111121130342.211953629@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20111121130342.211953629@intel.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 21:03 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'd like to push these 5 dirty throttling improvements to linux-next,
> targeting for inclusion in Linux 3.3.
> 
> It's a comfortably small series for review ;) And there are no changes since
> the last v12 post. (I went through them once again but find nothing to change.)
> 
>  [PATCH 1/5] writeback: balanced_rate cannot exceed write bandwidth
>  [PATCH 2/5] writeback: charge leaked page dirties to active tasks
>  [PATCH 3/5] writeback: fix dirtied pages accounting on sub-page writes
>  [PATCH 4/5] writeback: fix dirtied pages accounting on redirty
>  [PATCH 5/5] writeback: dirty ratelimit - think time compensation

Given the updates I'm ok with this series,

Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>

Thanks!