linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, aviro@redhat.com
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, akpm@osdl.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: 64-bit inode number issues
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 15:18:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <13246.1159971501@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060928164529.GA3497@infradead.org>

Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:

> 01-ino64.diff:
> 	ACK
> 
> 02-ino64-nfs.diff:
> 	Unfortunately there's a lot of broken userspace that can't deal
> 	with 64bit inode numbers, so you need to make the lod behaviour
> 	a mount option at least, probably even the default.  Given that
> 	we're going to run into problems like that it might make sense
> 	to make the option VFS-level instead of just in nfs.  (Note:
> 	XFS already has an option like that)

This problem doesn't just apply to NFS.  It applies to any filesystem that can
generate 64-bit inode numbers - which includes Ext3, I believe - so not
applying the NFS patch doesn't really solve your problem (Al Viro asked me for
examples of that, btw) and leaves my problem unsolved.

I think any solution has to apply at the VFS level or higher.  I'm not sure Al
agrees though.  I think we have to do one of the following:

 (1) Turn on inode number compression (which tries to hide the problem).

 (2) Give an error to stat and getdents if the inode number can't be
     represented by 32-bits.

And I think we're going to do this, that we need to do this on a per-superblock
basis or on a per-system basis, and I think it should be _off_ by default.  It
might also be possible to do it on a per-process level, but I suspect that'd be
too much effort.

David

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-10-05 13:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-28 16:45 fscache review comments, part 1 Christoph Hellwig
2006-09-28 17:30 ` Andreas Dilger
2006-09-29  0:02   ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-09-29  1:51     ` Timothy Shimmin
2006-09-29  8:38 ` David Howells
2006-10-02 13:40 ` David Howells
2006-10-02 17:39   ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-02 21:41     ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-10-04 13:44 ` Al Viro
2006-10-04 14:18 ` David Howells [this message]
2006-10-07 21:01   ` 64-bit inode number issues Christoph Hellwig
2006-10-09  9:01     ` David Chinner
2006-10-09 11:32     ` David Howells
2006-10-09 14:12       ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-09 23:53       ` David Chinner
2006-10-12 18:32     ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-10-17  6:02       ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-10-09  7:58   ` David Howells
2006-10-04 14:23 ` David Howells
2006-10-08  2:00   ` Theodore Tso
2006-10-08 16:02     ` Alexander Viro
2006-10-09 13:46 ` fscache review comments, part 1 David Howells
2006-10-10 13:31   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=13246.1159971501@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=aviro@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).