From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, aviro@redhat.com
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, akpm@osdl.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: 64-bit inode number issues
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 15:18:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <13246.1159971501@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060928164529.GA3497@infradead.org>
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
> 01-ino64.diff:
> ACK
>
> 02-ino64-nfs.diff:
> Unfortunately there's a lot of broken userspace that can't deal
> with 64bit inode numbers, so you need to make the lod behaviour
> a mount option at least, probably even the default. Given that
> we're going to run into problems like that it might make sense
> to make the option VFS-level instead of just in nfs. (Note:
> XFS already has an option like that)
This problem doesn't just apply to NFS. It applies to any filesystem that can
generate 64-bit inode numbers - which includes Ext3, I believe - so not
applying the NFS patch doesn't really solve your problem (Al Viro asked me for
examples of that, btw) and leaves my problem unsolved.
I think any solution has to apply at the VFS level or higher. I'm not sure Al
agrees though. I think we have to do one of the following:
(1) Turn on inode number compression (which tries to hide the problem).
(2) Give an error to stat and getdents if the inode number can't be
represented by 32-bits.
And I think we're going to do this, that we need to do this on a per-superblock
basis or on a per-system basis, and I think it should be _off_ by default. It
might also be possible to do it on a per-process level, but I suspect that'd be
too much effort.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-05 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-28 16:45 fscache review comments, part 1 Christoph Hellwig
2006-09-28 17:30 ` Andreas Dilger
2006-09-29 0:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-09-29 1:51 ` Timothy Shimmin
2006-09-29 8:38 ` David Howells
2006-10-02 13:40 ` David Howells
2006-10-02 17:39 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-02 21:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-10-04 13:44 ` Al Viro
2006-10-04 14:18 ` David Howells [this message]
2006-10-07 21:01 ` 64-bit inode number issues Christoph Hellwig
2006-10-09 9:01 ` David Chinner
2006-10-09 11:32 ` David Howells
2006-10-09 14:12 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-09 23:53 ` David Chinner
2006-10-12 18:32 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-10-17 6:02 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-10-09 7:58 ` David Howells
2006-10-04 14:23 ` David Howells
2006-10-08 2:00 ` Theodore Tso
2006-10-08 16:02 ` Alexander Viro
2006-10-09 13:46 ` fscache review comments, part 1 David Howells
2006-10-10 13:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=13246.1159971501@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=aviro@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).