From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Joel Reardon <joel@clambassador.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Remove notion of key schemes
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:56:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1332168998.11468.3.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1203161601210.2249@eristoteles.iwoars.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1201 bytes --]
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 16:02 +0100, Joel Reardon wrote:
> Removed the notion of different key schemes for ubifs with a single 64
> bit key scheme. Reduced the size of UBIFS keys to 8 bytes
> globally. Fill in the void left behind with padding for the effected
> nodes, so previous version will not be effected.
> Changed zero_* functions to operate on the new padding. Replaced key
> scheme enum with one entry into a define.
>
> This was tested using integck and writing files on a nandsimmed partition
> using both the vanilla version of ubifs and the modified version. Data
> was written using both ubifs drivers and successfully read when later
> mounting with either driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Reardon <reardonj@inf.ethz.ch>
Pushed to linux-ubifs.git, branch "joel", thanks.
But please, note, that this patch was also a bit big for review. The
better way would be make things like re-naming to be separate, etc. In
general, all non-brainers (everything you can do with a simple regexp,
like re-naming) should be separate. Then reviewer knows that he should
not spend to much time on that noise. And "brainers" go separate.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-19 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-09 15:24 [patch] Adding Secure Deletion to UBIFS Joel Reardon
2012-02-13 16:54 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-02-23 14:59 ` Joel Reardon
2012-02-23 15:29 ` [patch] Add encryption key parameter to compress/decompress functions Joel Reardon
2012-03-09 7:17 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-03-19 16:54 ` [patch] Add design document for UBIFS secure deletion Joel Reardon
2012-03-20 20:10 ` Randy Dunlap
2012-03-21 13:26 ` Joel Reardon
2012-03-21 16:20 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-03-21 16:10 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-03-23 13:50 ` Joel Reardon
2012-03-23 15:38 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-03-23 16:38 ` Joel Reardon
2012-03-26 15:03 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-02-29 17:09 ` [patch] Adding Secure Deletion to UBIFS Artem Bityutskiy
2012-03-15 14:48 ` [patch] Remove notion of key schemes Joel Reardon
2012-03-16 12:43 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-03-16 12:51 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-03-16 13:34 ` Joel Reardon
2012-03-16 13:41 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-03-16 15:02 ` Joel Reardon
2012-03-19 14:56 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2012-02-20 20:15 ` [patch] Move CRC computation to separate function Joel Reardon
2012-02-29 16:10 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-03-19 22:46 ` Joel Reardon
2012-03-23 14:09 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-03-23 16:45 ` Joel Reardon
2012-03-23 16:51 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-03-25 20:38 ` Joel Reardon
2012-03-26 15:34 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-03-25 21:11 ` [patch] Add a encryption key parameter to the compress / decompress function Joel Reardon
2012-03-25 21:38 ` [patch] Add cryptographic functionality when a key is passed to the compress / decompress functions Joel Reardon
2012-03-27 8:33 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-03-29 14:39 ` [patch] UBIFS: " Joel Reardon
2012-04-02 14:36 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-04-02 14:48 ` Joel Reardon
2012-04-02 14:57 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-04-02 14:58 ` Joel Reardon
2012-04-03 10:29 ` Joel Reardon
2012-04-03 10:41 ` Guillaume LECERF
2012-04-03 11:35 ` Joel Reardon
2012-03-27 8:27 ` [patch] Add a encryption key parameter to the compress / decompress function Artem Bityutskiy
2012-03-29 14:11 ` [patch] UBIFS: " Joel Reardon
2012-04-02 14:02 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-02-29 17:25 ` [patch] Adding Secure Deletion to UBIFS Artem Bityutskiy
2012-03-01 13:41 ` Joel Reardon
2012-03-09 7:36 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-03-09 19:29 ` Joel Reardon
2012-03-12 13:30 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-03-12 13:34 ` Joel Reardon
2012-03-12 13:36 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-03-12 13:37 ` Joel Reardon
2012-03-14 10:20 ` Joel Reardon
2012-03-14 10:27 ` Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1332168998.11468.3.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com \
--to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@clambassador.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).