linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] writeback: Separate inode requeueing after writeback
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 23:56:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1332284191-21076-5-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1332284191-21076-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz>

Move inode requeueing after inode has been written out into a separate
function.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
 fs/fs-writeback.c |   94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index 0ef272e..789f829 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -343,6 +343,52 @@ static void inode_wait_for_writeback(struct inode *inode,
 	}
 }
 
+static void inode_wb_requeue(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb,
+			     struct writeback_control *wbc)
+{
+	if (inode->i_state & I_FREEING)
+		return;
+
+	/*
+	 * Sync livelock prevention. Each inode is tagged and synced in one
+	 * shot. If still dirty, it will be redirty_tail()'ed below.  Update
+	 * the dirty time to prevent enqueue and sync it again.
+	 */
+	if ((inode->i_state & I_DIRTY) &&
+	    (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL || wbc->tagged_writepages))
+		inode->dirtied_when = jiffies;
+
+	if (mapping_tagged(inode->i_mapping, PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY)) {
+		/*
+		 * We didn't write back all the pages.  nfs_writepages()
+		 * sometimes bales out without doing anything.
+		 */
+		if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0) {
+			/* Slice used up. Queue for next turn. */
+			requeue_io(inode, wb);
+		} else {
+			/*
+			 * Writeback blocked by something other than
+			 * congestion. Delay the inode for some time to
+			 * avoid spinning on the CPU (100% iowait)
+			 * retrying writeback of the dirty page/inode
+			 * that cannot be performed immediately.
+			 */
+			redirty_tail(inode, wb);
+		}
+	} else if (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY) {
+		/*
+		 * Filesystems can dirty the inode during writeback operations,
+		 * such as delayed allocation during submission or metadata
+		 * updates after data IO completion.
+		 */
+		redirty_tail(inode, wb);
+	} else {
+		/* The inode is clean. Remove from writeback lists. */
+		list_del_init(&inode->i_wb_list);
+	}
+}
+
 /*
  * Write out an inode's dirty pages.  Called under wb->list_lock and
  * inode->i_lock.  Either the caller has an active reference on the inode or
@@ -421,53 +467,7 @@ writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb,
 
 	spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
 	spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
-	if (!(inode->i_state & I_FREEING)) {
-		/*
-		 * Sync livelock prevention. Each inode is tagged and synced in
-		 * one shot. If still dirty, it will be redirty_tail()'ed below.
-		 * Update the dirty time to prevent enqueue and sync it again.
-		 */
-		if ((inode->i_state & I_DIRTY) &&
-		    (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL || wbc->tagged_writepages))
-			inode->dirtied_when = jiffies;
-
-		if (mapping_tagged(mapping, PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY)) {
-			/*
-			 * We didn't write back all the pages.  nfs_writepages()
-			 * sometimes bales out without doing anything.
-			 */
-			if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0) {
-				/*
-				 * slice used up: queue for next turn
-				 */
-				requeue_io(inode, wb);
-			} else {
-				/*
-				 * Writeback blocked by something other than
-				 * congestion. Delay the inode for some time to
-				 * avoid spinning on the CPU (100% iowait)
-				 * retrying writeback of the dirty page/inode
-				 * that cannot be performed immediately.
-				 */
-				redirty_tail(inode, wb);
-			}
-		} else if (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY) {
-			/*
-			 * Filesystems can dirty the inode during writeback
-			 * operations, such as delayed allocation during
-			 * submission or metadata updates after data IO
-			 * completion.
-			 */
-			redirty_tail(inode, wb);
-		} else {
-			/*
-			 * The inode is clean.  At this point we either have
-			 * a reference to the inode or it's on it's way out.
-			 * No need to add it back to the LRU.
-			 */
-			list_del_init(&inode->i_wb_list);
-		}
-	}
+	inode_wb_requeue(inode, wb, wbc);
 	inode_sync_complete(inode);
 	trace_writeback_single_inode(inode, wbc, nr_to_write);
 	return ret;
-- 
1.7.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-03-20 22:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-20 22:56 [PATCH 0/7 v2] writeback: Avoid iput() from flusher thread Jan Kara
2012-03-20 22:56 ` [PATCH 1/7] writeback: Move clearing of I_SYNC into inode_sync_complete() Jan Kara
2012-04-30 14:36   ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-04-30 21:30     ` Jan Kara
2012-03-20 22:56 ` [PATCH 2/7] writeback: Move requeueing when I_SYNC set to writeback_sb_inodes() Jan Kara
2012-04-30 14:38   ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-03-20 22:56 ` [PATCH 3/7] writeback: Move I_DIRTY_PAGES handling Jan Kara
2012-03-22  2:41   ` Fengguang Wu
2012-03-22  8:35     ` Jan Kara
2012-03-28  3:11       ` Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 15:12         ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-04-30 14:39           ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-04-30 14:41   ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-04-30 21:21     ` Jan Kara
2012-03-20 22:56 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2012-04-30 14:43   ` [PATCH 4/7] writeback: Separate inode requeueing after writeback Christoph Hellwig
2012-04-30 21:42     ` Jan Kara
2012-03-20 22:56 ` [PATCH 5/7] writeback: Remove wb->list_lock from writeback_single_inode() Jan Kara
2012-04-30 14:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-03-20 22:56 ` [PATCH 6/7] writeback: Refactor writeback_single_inode() Jan Kara
2012-03-20 23:35   ` Dave Chinner
2012-03-21 10:03     ` Jan Kara
2012-04-30 14:46   ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-03-20 22:56 ` [PATCH 7/7] writeback: Avoid iput() from flusher thread Jan Kara
2012-03-20 23:50   ` Dave Chinner
2012-03-21 10:25     ` Jan Kara
2012-03-22  3:03       ` Fengguang Wu
2012-03-22  6:27       ` Dave Chinner
2012-03-22  9:50         ` Jan Kara
2012-03-22  3:01   ` Fengguang Wu
2012-04-30 15:30   ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-04-30 21:58     ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1332284191-21076-5-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).