From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: 64-bit inode number issues
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 15:23:49 +0100
Message-ID: <13329.1159971829@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com>
References: <13246.1159971501@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com>  <20060928164529.GA3497@infradead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, aviro@redhat.com,
	akpm@osdl.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:13715 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750839AbWJEN2k (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 5 Oct 2006 09:28:40 -0400
In-Reply-To: <13246.1159971501@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> 
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:

> This problem doesn't just apply to NFS.  It applies to any filesystem that can
> generate 64-bit inode numbers - which includes Ext3, I believe

Actually, Ext3 can't do 64-bit inode numbers.  I'd misremembered what Stephen
told me.

David