From: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
To: Ted Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Linux Kernel Maling List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux FS Maling List <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ext4 Mailing List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] do not use s_dirt in ext4
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 14:45:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1333367140-28370-1-git-send-email-artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> (raw)
This patch-set makes ext4 independent of the VFS superblock management
services. Namely, ext4 does not require to register the 'write_super()' VFS
call-back.
The reason of this exercises is to get rid of the 'sync_supers()' kernel thread
which wakes up every 5 seconds (by default) even if all superblocks are clean.
This is wasteful from power management POW (unnecessary wake-ups).
Version 1 of this patch-set can be found here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/20/220
Changes between v1 and v2.
* Rake different strategy - instead of pushing 's_dirt' down "as-is" and
emulating old behavior, we now just submit the superblock for writing
straight away, either via the journal or directly. Thank to Jan Kara
for helping with this.
* Ted picked some of the patches already, which made this series shorter
- thanks!
* This time I've tested the changes using xfstests.
* Rebased to 3.4-rc1.
Note: Ted, you merged the "mm: export dirty_writeback_interval", but it looks
like we won't need this for ext[23]. However, for other file-systems we will
need this change.
Thanks,
Artem.
next reply other threads:[~2012-04-02 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-02 11:45 Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2012-04-02 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] ext4: Remove useless marking of superblock dirty Artem Bityutskiy
2012-04-12 7:20 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-04-30 8:37 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-06-01 13:53 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-06-01 13:55 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-06-01 15:16 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-06-01 17:48 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-06-21 13:11 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-04-02 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] ext4: Convert last user of ext4_mark_super_dirty() to ext4_handle_dirty_super() Artem Bityutskiy
2012-04-02 11:45 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-04-02 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] ext4: remove unnecessary superblock dirtying Artem Bityutskiy
2012-04-02 21:49 ` Jan Kara
2012-04-02 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] ext4: weed out ext4_write_super Artem Bityutskiy
2012-04-02 21:50 ` Jan Kara
2012-05-18 10:25 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] do not use s_dirt in ext4 Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1333367140-28370-1-git-send-email-artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com \
--to=artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).