linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Takuya Yoshikawa <takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	avi@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com,
	yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp
Subject: Re: [RFC] sched: make callers check lock contention for cond_resched_lock()
Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 17:47:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1336060050.22523.23.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120503220050.e91938418f882b4075526e08@gmail.com>

On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 22:00 +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> But as I could not see why spin_needbreak() was differently
> implemented
> depending on CONFIG_PREEMPT, I wanted to understand the meaning. 

Its been that way since before voluntary preemption was introduced, so
its possible Ingo simply missed that spot and nobody noticed until now.

Ingo, do you have any recollections from back when?

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-03 15:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-03  8:12 [RFC] sched: make callers check lock contention for cond_resched_lock() Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-05-03  8:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-03 12:22   ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-05-03 12:29     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-03 12:47       ` Avi Kivity
2012-05-03 14:11         ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-05-03 14:27           ` Avi Kivity
2012-05-03 14:38             ` Avi Kivity
2012-05-03 13:00       ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-05-03 15:47         ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2012-05-10 22:03           ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-05-18  7:26             ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-18 16:10               ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-05-04  2:43         ` Michael Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1336060050.22523.23.camel@twins \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com \
    --cc=yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).