linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux FS Maling List <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Maling List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] hfs: get rid of hfs_sync_super
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:15:38 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1341238538.2979.21.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1339488818-14461-7-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8165 bytes --]

From: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:40:56 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 19/23] hfs: get rid of hfs_sync_super

This patch makes hfs stop using the VFS '->write_super()' method along with
the 's_dirt' superblock flag, because they are on their way out.

The whole "superblock write-out" VFS infrastructure is served by the
'sync_supers()' kernel thread, which wakes up every 5 (by default) seconds and
writes out all dirty superblocks using the '->write_super()' call-back.  But the
problem with this thread is that it wastes power by waking up the system every
5 seconds, even if there are no diry superblocks, or there are no client
file-systems which would need this (e.g., btrfs does not use
'->write_super()'). So we want to kill it completely and thus, we need to make
file-systems to stop using the '->write_super()' VFS service, and then remove
it together with the kernel thread.

Tested using fsstress from the LTP project.

Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
---
 fs/hfs/extent.c |    2 +-
 fs/hfs/hfs_fs.h |    9 +++++++-
 fs/hfs/inode.c  |   11 ++++------
 fs/hfs/mdb.c    |    2 ++
 fs/hfs/super.c  |   65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 5 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

|This is patch is the same except that it fixes several white-space
|issues. If you prefer an incremental patch, please, let me know. The
|issues are:
|
|WARNING:SUSPECT_CODE_INDENT: suspect code indent for conditional statements (8, 15)
|#213: FILE: fs/hfs/super.c:73:
|+       if (sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)
|+              return;
|
|WARNING:SUSPECT_CODE_INDENT: suspect code indent for conditional statements (8, 15)
|#217: FILE: fs/hfs/super.c:77:
|+       if (!sbi->work_queued) {
|+              delay = msecs_to_jiffies(dirty_writeback_interval * 10);

diff --git a/fs/hfs/extent.c b/fs/hfs/extent.c
index 2c16316..a67955a 100644
--- a/fs/hfs/extent.c
+++ b/fs/hfs/extent.c
@@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ out:
 		if (inode->i_ino < HFS_FIRSTUSER_CNID)
 			set_bit(HFS_FLG_ALT_MDB_DIRTY, &HFS_SB(sb)->flags);
 		set_bit(HFS_FLG_MDB_DIRTY, &HFS_SB(sb)->flags);
-		sb->s_dirt = 1;
+		hfs_mark_mdb_dirty(sb);
 	}
 	return res;
 
diff --git a/fs/hfs/hfs_fs.h b/fs/hfs/hfs_fs.h
index 3515612..8275175 100644
--- a/fs/hfs/hfs_fs.h
+++ b/fs/hfs/hfs_fs.h
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
 #include <linux/buffer_head.h>
 #include <linux/fs.h>
+#include <linux/workqueue.h>
 
 #include <asm/byteorder.h>
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
@@ -143,6 +144,9 @@ struct hfs_sb_info {
 	u16 blockoffset;
 	int fs_div;
 	struct super_block *sb;
+	int work_queued;		/* non-zero delayed work is queued */
+	struct delayed_work mdb_work;	/* MDB flush delayed work */
+	spinlock_t work_lock;		/* protects mdb_work and work_queued */
 };
 
 #define HFS_FLG_BITMAP_DIRTY	0
@@ -222,6 +226,9 @@ extern int hfs_compare_dentry(const struct dentry *parent,
 extern void hfs_asc2mac(struct super_block *, struct hfs_name *, struct qstr *);
 extern int hfs_mac2asc(struct super_block *, char *, const struct hfs_name *);
 
+/* super.c */
+extern void hfs_mark_mdb_dirty(struct super_block *sb);
+
 extern struct timezone sys_tz;
 
 /*
@@ -249,7 +256,7 @@ static inline const char *hfs_mdb_name(struct super_block *sb)
 static inline void hfs_bitmap_dirty(struct super_block *sb)
 {
 	set_bit(HFS_FLG_BITMAP_DIRTY, &HFS_SB(sb)->flags);
-	sb->s_dirt = 1;
+	hfs_mark_mdb_dirty(sb);
 }
 
 #define sb_bread512(sb, sec, data) ({			\
diff --git a/fs/hfs/inode.c b/fs/hfs/inode.c
index 629eba4..cb78138 100644
--- a/fs/hfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/hfs/inode.c
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ struct inode *hfs_new_inode(struct inode *dir, struct qstr *name, umode_t mode)
 	insert_inode_hash(inode);
 	mark_inode_dirty(inode);
 	set_bit(HFS_FLG_MDB_DIRTY, &HFS_SB(sb)->flags);
-	sb->s_dirt = 1;
+	hfs_mark_mdb_dirty(sb);
 
 	return inode;
 }
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ void hfs_delete_inode(struct inode *inode)
 		if (HFS_I(inode)->cat_key.ParID == cpu_to_be32(HFS_ROOT_CNID))
 			HFS_SB(sb)->root_dirs--;
 		set_bit(HFS_FLG_MDB_DIRTY, &HFS_SB(sb)->flags);
-		sb->s_dirt = 1;
+		hfs_mark_mdb_dirty(sb);
 		return;
 	}
 	HFS_SB(sb)->file_count--;
@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ void hfs_delete_inode(struct inode *inode)
 		}
 	}
 	set_bit(HFS_FLG_MDB_DIRTY, &HFS_SB(sb)->flags);
-	sb->s_dirt = 1;
+	hfs_mark_mdb_dirty(sb);
 }
 
 void hfs_inode_read_fork(struct inode *inode, struct hfs_extent *ext,
@@ -644,10 +644,7 @@ static int hfs_file_fsync(struct file *filp, loff_t start, loff_t end,
 
 	/* sync the superblock to buffers */
 	sb = inode->i_sb;
-	if (sb->s_dirt) {
-		sb->s_dirt = 0;
-		hfs_mdb_commit(sb);
-	}
+	flush_delayed_work_sync(&HFS_SB(sb)->mdb_work);
 	/* .. finally sync the buffers to disk */
 	err = sync_blockdev(sb->s_bdev);
 	if (!ret)
diff --git a/fs/hfs/mdb.c b/fs/hfs/mdb.c
index 5fd51a5..a5cd355 100644
--- a/fs/hfs/mdb.c
+++ b/fs/hfs/mdb.c
@@ -263,6 +263,8 @@ void hfs_mdb_commit(struct super_block *sb)
 	if (sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)
 		return;
 
+	cancel_delayed_work(&HFS_SB(sb)->mdb_work);
+
 	lock_buffer(HFS_SB(sb)->mdb_bh);
 	if (test_and_clear_bit(HFS_FLG_MDB_DIRTY, &HFS_SB(sb)->flags)) {
 		/* These parameters may have been modified, so write them back */
diff --git a/fs/hfs/super.c b/fs/hfs/super.c
index 99c6239..14528ee 100644
--- a/fs/hfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/hfs/super.c
@@ -29,38 +29,9 @@ static struct kmem_cache *hfs_inode_cachep;
 
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
 
-/*
- * hfs_write_super()
- *
- * Description:
- *   This function is called by the VFS only. When the filesystem
- *   is mounted r/w it updates the MDB on disk.
- * Input Variable(s):
- *   struct super_block *sb: Pointer to the hfs superblock
- * Output Variable(s):
- *   NONE
- * Returns:
- *   void
- * Preconditions:
- *   'sb' points to a "valid" (struct super_block).
- * Postconditions:
- *   The MDB is marked 'unsuccessfully unmounted' by clearing bit 8 of drAtrb
- *   (hfs_put_super() must set this flag!). Some MDB fields are updated
- *   and the MDB buffer is written to disk by calling hfs_mdb_commit().
- */
-static void hfs_write_super(struct super_block *sb)
-{
-	sb->s_dirt = 0;
-
-	/* sync everything to the buffers */
-	hfs_mdb_commit(sb);
-}
-
 static int hfs_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
 {
 	hfs_mdb_commit(sb);
-	sb->s_dirt = 0;
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -73,11 +44,44 @@ static int hfs_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
  */
 static void hfs_put_super(struct super_block *sb)
 {
+	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&HFS_SB(sb)->mdb_work);
 	hfs_mdb_close(sb);
 	/* release the MDB's resources */
 	hfs_mdb_put(sb);
 }
 
+static void flush_mdb(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct hfs_sb_info *sbi;
+	struct super_block *sb;
+
+	sbi = container_of(work, struct hfs_sb_info, mdb_work.work);
+	sb = sbi->sb;
+
+	spin_lock(&sbi->work_lock);
+	sbi->work_queued = 0;
+	spin_unlock(&sbi->work_lock);
+
+	hfs_mdb_commit(sb);
+}
+
+void hfs_mark_mdb_dirty(struct super_block *sb)
+{
+	struct hfs_sb_info *sbi = HFS_SB(sb);
+	unsigned long delay;
+
+	if (sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)
+		return;
+
+	spin_lock(&sbi->work_lock);
+	if (!sbi->work_queued) {
+		delay = msecs_to_jiffies(dirty_writeback_interval * 10);
+		queue_delayed_work(system_long_wq, &sbi->mdb_work, delay);
+		sbi->work_queued = 1;
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&sbi->work_lock);
+}
+
 /*
  * hfs_statfs()
  *
@@ -177,7 +181,6 @@ static const struct super_operations hfs_super_operations = {
 	.write_inode	= hfs_write_inode,
 	.evict_inode	= hfs_evict_inode,
 	.put_super	= hfs_put_super,
-	.write_super	= hfs_write_super,
 	.sync_fs	= hfs_sync_fs,
 	.statfs		= hfs_statfs,
 	.remount_fs     = hfs_remount,
@@ -382,6 +385,8 @@ static int hfs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
 
 	sbi->sb = sb;
 	sb->s_fs_info = sbi;
+	spin_lock_init(&sbi->work_lock);
+	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&sbi->mdb_work, flush_mdb);
 
 	res = -EINVAL;
 	if (!parse_options((char *)data, sbi)) {
-- 
1.7.10

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2012-07-02 14:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-12  8:13 [PATCH 0/6] hfs: stop using write_supers and s_dirt Artem Bityutskiy
2012-06-12  8:13 ` [PATCH 1/6] hfs: push lock_super down Artem Bityutskiy
2012-06-12  8:13 ` [PATCH 2/6] hfs: get rid of lock_super Artem Bityutskiy
2012-06-12  8:13 ` [PATCH 3/6] hfs: remove extra mdb write on unmount Artem Bityutskiy
2012-06-12  8:13 ` [PATCH 4/6] hfs: simplify a bit checking for R/O Artem Bityutskiy
2012-06-12  8:13 ` [PATCH 5/6] hfs: introduce VFS superblock object back-reference Artem Bityutskiy
2012-06-12  8:13 ` [PATCH 6/6] hfs: get rid of hfs_sync_super Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-02 14:15   ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1341238538.2979.21.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com \
    --to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).