From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: Alex Kelly <eshink@gmail.com>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Nikhil Rao <ncrao@google.com>,
Dan Ballard <dan@mindstab.net>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Made core dump functionality optional
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 11:22:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1342149765.31095.9.camel@cr0> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH08tp_5CNnK68G4BpZ+d_V9OMwEt8hC_pbtNovgSCTnGYd0hg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 13:22 -0700, Alex Kelly wrote:
> Sorry it took me so long to reply to this:
>
> 1. *Should* I change the option to CONFIG_CORE_DUMP ? I agree with Josh
> that in terms of the existing codebase, either way makes sense, but I'll
> defer to your judgment if you think I should change it.
Yeah, I agree.
>
> 2. Is there a particular maintainer I should send this to if I hope to get
> it pushed upstream?
>
I think Andrew Morton will take the patch.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-13 3:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-03 0:38 [PATCH 1/2] Moved core dump functionality into its own file Alex Kelly
2012-07-03 0:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] Made core dump functionality optional Alex Kelly
2012-07-03 4:55 ` Cong Wang
2012-07-03 5:09 ` Josh Triplett
[not found] ` <CAH08tp_5CNnK68G4BpZ+d_V9OMwEt8hC_pbtNovgSCTnGYd0hg@mail.gmail.com>
2012-07-13 3:22 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2012-07-03 4:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] Moved core dump functionality into its own file Cong Wang
2012-07-13 22:02 ` Andrew Morton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-08-01 2:23 Alex Kelly
2012-08-01 2:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] Made core dump functionality optional Alex Kelly
2012-08-03 21:03 [PATCH 1/2] Moved core dump functionality into its own file Alex Kelly
2012-08-03 21:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] Made core dump functionality optional Alex Kelly
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1342149765.31095.9.camel@cr0 \
--to=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan@mindstab.net \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=eshink@gmail.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ncrao@google.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).