From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cong Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Made core dump functionality optional Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 11:22:45 +0800 Message-ID: <1342149765.31095.9.camel@cr0> References: <1341275894-9737-1-git-send-email-alex.page.kelly@gmail.com> <1341275894-9737-2-git-send-email-alex.page.kelly@gmail.com> <20120703050908.GA14527@leaf> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Josh Triplett , Cong Wang , Alexander Viro , Heiko Carstens , Andrew Morton , Eric Paris , "Paul E. McKenney" , Ingo Molnar , Nikhil Rao , Dan Ballard , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Alex Kelly Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60387 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754698Ab2GMDXL (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2012 23:23:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 13:22 -0700, Alex Kelly wrote: > Sorry it took me so long to reply to this: > > 1. *Should* I change the option to CONFIG_CORE_DUMP ? I agree with Josh > that in terms of the existing codebase, either way makes sense, but I'll > defer to your judgment if you think I should change it. Yeah, I agree. > > 2. Is there a particular maintainer I should send this to if I hope to get > it pushed upstream? > I think Andrew Morton will take the patch. Thanks.