From: Guo Chao <yan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Cc: dchinner@redhat.com, hch@infradead.org, jack@suse.cz,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] fs/inode.c: do not take i_lock on newly allocated inode
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 17:31:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1348219866-1799-2-git-send-email-yan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1348219866-1799-1-git-send-email-yan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Does current thread have the exclusive access to newly allocated inode?
The chanllege comes from individual filesystem's ->alloc_inode method.
It may exposure the inode to private lists, thus give other threads a chance
to access the inode.
That should not happen, however, because the inode is not even gone through a
basic initialization. The locks may not be initialized yet, the inode is not
ready for parallel access.
Thus, from getting an inode from alloc_inode(), till we put it on a list and
that list becomes accessible, we can safely manipulate the inode without
taking i_lock.
This patch fixes three places that take the unnecessary i_lock.
Note in iget5_locked(), I have no strong proof set() should not put the inode
into private lists. Any suggestion?
Signed-off-by: Guo Chao <yan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
fs/inode.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index ac8d904..d2d15aa 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -895,9 +895,7 @@ struct inode *new_inode_pseudo(struct super_block *sb)
struct inode *inode = alloc_inode(sb);
if (inode) {
- spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
inode->i_state = 0;
- spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&inode->i_sb_list);
}
return inode;
@@ -1015,10 +1013,8 @@ struct inode *iget5_locked(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long hashval,
if (set(inode, data))
goto set_failed;
- spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
inode->i_state = I_NEW;
hlist_add_head(&inode->i_hash, head);
- spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
inode_sb_list_add(inode);
spin_unlock(&inode_hash_lock);
@@ -1082,10 +1078,8 @@ struct inode *iget_locked(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino)
old = find_inode_fast(sb, head, ino);
if (!old) {
inode->i_ino = ino;
- spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
inode->i_state = I_NEW;
hlist_add_head(&inode->i_hash, head);
- spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
inode_sb_list_add(inode);
spin_unlock(&inode_hash_lock);
--
1.7.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-21 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-21 9:31 [RFC v4 Patch 0/4] fs/inode.c: optimization for inode lock usage Guo Chao
2012-09-21 9:31 ` Guo Chao [this message]
2012-09-21 9:31 ` [PATCH 2/4] fs/inode.c: do not take i_lock in __(insert|remove)_inode_hash Guo Chao
2012-09-21 9:31 ` [PATCH 3/4] fs/inode.c: do not take i_lock when identify an inode Guo Chao
2012-09-21 9:31 ` [PATCH 4/4] fs/inode.c: always take i_lock before calling filesystem's test() method Guo Chao
2012-09-21 12:17 ` [RFC v4 Patch 0/4] fs/inode.c: optimization for inode lock usage Matthew Wilcox
2012-09-21 22:49 ` Dave Chinner
2012-09-24 2:42 ` Guo Chao
2012-09-24 4:23 ` Dave Chinner
2012-09-24 6:12 ` Guo Chao
2012-09-24 6:28 ` Dave Chinner
2012-09-24 7:08 ` Guo Chao
2012-09-24 8:26 ` Dave Chinner
2012-09-25 8:59 ` Guo Chao
2012-09-26 0:54 ` Dave Chinner
2012-09-27 8:41 ` Guo Chao
2012-09-27 11:51 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1348219866-1799-2-git-send-email-yan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=yan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).