From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ima: policy search speedup
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:08:34 -0500
Message-ID: <1355234914.2356.85.camel@falcor>
References: <cover.1353621075.git.dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com>
	 <CALLzPKZKd38QJVPfjdNpAFO9hwmRc1asVGkHby1VGRLm89DKyg@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CALLzPKZgxO9wRNfJPnSY=G6Gjib7MeEXM4D1A1YZsrVmbs1W6A@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
To: "Kasatkin, Dmitry" <dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <CALLzPKZgxO9wRNfJPnSY=G6Gjib7MeEXM4D1A1YZsrVmbs1W6A@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 2012-12-11 at 14:51 +0200, Kasatkin, Dmitry wrote:

> >> Here is two patches for policy search speedup.
> >>
> >> First patch adds additional features flags to superblock.
> >> Second - implementation for IMA.
> >>
> >> Two months ago I was asking about it on mailing lists.
> >> Suggestion was not to use s_flags, but e.g. s_feature_flags.
> >>
> >> Any objections about such approach?

First of all my appologies for not responding earlier.  Based on the
previous discussion https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/19/9, this looks like
the right direction.  Specific comments will be posted on the individual
patches.

thanks,

Mimi