From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
To: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs:Add mutex_lock to protect f2fs_stat_list.
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:29:38 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1358234978.8234.53.camel@kjgkr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201301142008133402501@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3683 bytes --]
Hi Jianpeng, again. :)
How about this patch based on your original patch?
Could you test this?
Thanks,
From 74c4159102ff4808cc59ea8513bd276605c30972 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 20:08:16 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: add global mutex_lock to protect f2fs_stat_list
There is an race condition between umounting f2fs and reading
f2fs/status, which results in oops.
Fox example:
Thread A Thread B
umount f2fs cat f2fs/status
f2fs_destroy_stats() { stat_show() {
list_for_each_entry_safe(&f2fs_stat_list)
list_del(&si->stat_list);
mutex_lock(&si->stat_lock);
si->sbi = NULL;
mutex_unlock(&si->stat_lock);
kfree(sbi->stat_info);
} mutex_lock(&si->stat_lock) <- si is gone.
...
}
Solution with a global lock: f2fs_stat_mutex:
Thread A Thread B
umount f2fs cat f2fs/status
f2fs_destroy_stats() { stat_show() {
mutex_lock(&f2fs_stat_mutex);
list_del(&si->stat_list);
mutex_unlock(&f2fs_stat_mutex);
kfree(sbi->stat_info); mutex_lock(&f2fs_stat_mutex);
} list_for_each_entry_safe(&f2fs_stat_list)
...
mutex_unlock(&f2fs_stat_mutex);
}
Signed-off-by: Jianpeng Ma <majianpeng@gmail.com>
[jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com: fix typos, description, and remove the
existing lock]
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
---
fs/f2fs/debug.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/debug.c b/fs/f2fs/debug.c
index 0c374d1..818f2ed 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/debug.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/debug.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
static LIST_HEAD(f2fs_stat_list);
static struct dentry *debugfs_root;
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(f2fs_stat_mutex);
static void update_general_status(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
{
@@ -180,13 +181,9 @@ static int stat_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
int i = 0;
int j;
+ mutex_lock(&f2fs_stat_mutex);
list_for_each_entry_safe(si, next, &f2fs_stat_list, stat_list) {
- mutex_lock(&si->stat_lock);
- if (!si->sbi) {
- mutex_unlock(&si->stat_lock);
- continue;
- }
update_general_status(si->sbi);
seq_printf(s, "\n=====[ partition info. #%d ]=====\n", i++);
@@ -286,8 +283,8 @@ static int stat_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
seq_printf(s, "\nMemory: %u KB = static: %u + cached: %u\n",
(si->base_mem + si->cache_mem) >> 10,
si->base_mem >> 10, si->cache_mem >> 10);
- mutex_unlock(&si->stat_lock);
}
+ mutex_unlock(&f2fs_stat_mutex);
return 0;
}
@@ -313,9 +310,6 @@ static int init_stats(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
return -ENOMEM;
si = sbi->stat_info;
- mutex_init(&si->stat_lock);
- list_add_tail(&si->stat_list, &f2fs_stat_list);
-
si->all_area_segs = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->segment_count);
si->sit_area_segs = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->segment_count_sit);
si->nat_area_segs = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->segment_count_nat);
@@ -325,6 +319,11 @@ static int init_stats(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
si->main_area_zones = si->main_area_sections /
le32_to_cpu(raw_super->secs_per_zone);
si->sbi = sbi;
+
+ mutex_lock(&f2fs_stat_mutex);
+ list_add_tail(&si->stat_list, &f2fs_stat_list);
+ mutex_unlock(&f2fs_stat_mutex);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -348,10 +347,10 @@ void f2fs_destroy_stats(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
{
struct f2fs_stat_info *si = sbi->stat_info;
+ mutex_lock(&f2fs_stat_mutex);
list_del(&si->stat_list);
- mutex_lock(&si->stat_lock);
- si->sbi = NULL;
- mutex_unlock(&si->stat_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&f2fs_stat_mutex);
+
kfree(sbi->stat_info);
}
--
1.8.0.1.250.gb7973fb
--
Jaegeuk Kim
Samsung
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-15 7:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <201301142008133402501@gmail.com>
2013-01-15 2:57 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs:Add mutex_lock to protect f2fs_stat_list Huajun Li
2013-01-15 7:04 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2013-01-15 7:29 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1358234978.8234.53.camel@kjgkr \
--to=jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=majianpeng@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).