From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/31] IGET: Stop FreeVXFS from using iget() and read_inode() [try #5]
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 11:09:23 +0000
Message-ID: <1363.1194347363@redhat.com>
References: <20071106022505.f32b1bff.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20071025163352.5057.59344.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20071025163514.5057.4558.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:46429 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753958AbXKFLJq (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 6 Nov 2007 06:09:46 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20071106022505.f32b1bff.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> Not completely trivial - the ino_t -> unsigned long conversion needs to be
> propagated fairly widely in there.

I'll just make it unsigned long.  That's what iget() took as the inode number
parameter type, so it can't behave any differently as a first guess.

David