linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
To: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>,
	Amit Sahrawat <a.sahrawat@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] f2fs: avoid BUG_ON from check_nid_range and update return path in do_read_inode
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 14:40:19 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1363585219.14386.71.camel@kjgkr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKYAXd804YVAc0c3ExerXanka+VpG=b_5jizGK6_QuajxN0_GA@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2794 bytes --]

2013-03-18 (월), 14:23 +0900, Namjae Jeon:
> 2013/3/18, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>:
> > 2013-03-17 (일), 17:27 +0900, Namjae Jeon:
> >> From: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
> >>
> >> In function check_nid_range, there is no need to trigger BUG_ON and make
> >> kernel stop.
> >> Instead it could just check and indicate the inode number to be EINVAL.
> >> Update the return path in do_read_inode to use the return from
> >> check_nid_range.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Amit Sahrawat <a.sahrawat@samsung.com>
> >> ---
> >>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h  |    6 ++++--
> >>  fs/f2fs/inode.c |    6 +++++-
> >>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> >> index be7ae70..1dae921 100644
> >> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> >> @@ -515,9 +515,11 @@ static inline void mutex_unlock_op(struct
> >> f2fs_sb_info *sbi, enum lock_type t)
> >>  /*
> >>   * Check whether the given nid is within node id range.
> >>   */
> >> -static inline void check_nid_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
> >> +static inline int check_nid_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
> >>  {
> >> -	BUG_ON((nid >= NM_I(sbi)->max_nid));
> >> +	if (nid >= NM_I(sbi)->max_nid)
> >> +		return -EINVAL;
> >> +	return 0;
> >
> Hi Jaegeuk.
> > At this moment, I'd like to apply this patch and remain BUG_ON together
> > since we should find real bugs in f2fs.
> > How do you think?
> Instead of BUG_ON, we can make use of WARN_ON as that can also solve
> our purpose of finding the real bugs with the same information (back
> trace) and will also keep system running.
> 

Got it~!
Thanks,

> Thanks :)
> >
> >>  }
> >>
> >>  #define F2FS_DEFAULT_ALLOCATED_BLOCKS	1
> >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inode.c b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> >> index ddae412..6d82020 100644
> >> --- a/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> >> @@ -44,7 +44,11 @@ static int do_read_inode(struct inode *inode)
> >>  	struct f2fs_inode *ri;
> >>
> >>  	/* Check if ino is within scope */
> >> -	check_nid_range(sbi, inode->i_ino);
> >> +	if (check_nid_range(sbi, inode->i_ino)) {
> >> +		f2fs_msg(inode->i_sb, KERN_ERR, "bad inode number: %lu",
> >> +			 (unsigned long) inode->i_ino);
> >> +		return -EINVAL;
> >> +	}
> >>
> >>  	node_page = get_node_page(sbi, inode->i_ino);
> >>  	if (IS_ERR(node_page))
> >
> > --
> > Jaegeuk Kim
> > Samsung
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-- 
Jaegeuk Kim
Samsung

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2013-03-18  5:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-17  8:27 [PATCH 5/5] f2fs: avoid BUG_ON from check_nid_range and update return path in do_read_inode Namjae Jeon
2013-03-18  2:19 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2013-03-18  5:23   ` Namjae Jeon
2013-03-18  5:40     ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1363585219.14386.71.camel@kjgkr \
    --to=jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=a.sahrawat@samsung.com \
    --cc=linkinjeon@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=namjae.jeon@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).