From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
To: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9 v2] f2fs: remove redundant lock_page calls
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 17:12:49 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1364976769.4353.11.camel@kjgkr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKYAXd_rkU5t=OOxjTu0CtKHfrTYkbJuJ2ZFNd=aaRsuToHU7A@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4444 bytes --]
Hi,
Agreed, and send v2.
Change log from v1:
o remain read_node_page and remove the lock part
From 04006aecac2882c574fe8a7de926bc52c73a8ad1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 12:47:20 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: remove redundant lock_page calls
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
In get_node_page, we do not need to call lock_page all the time.
If the node page is cached as uptodate,
1. grab_cache_page locks the page,
2. read_node_page unlocks the page, and
3. lock_page is called for further process.
Let's avoid this.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
---
fs/f2fs/node.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
fs/f2fs/node.h | 3 +++
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index 10cbee9..e3484b5 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -847,6 +847,12 @@ fail:
return ERR_PTR(err);
}
+/*
+ * Caller should do after getting the following values.
+ * 0: f2fs_put_page(page, 0)
+ * LOCKED_PAGE: f2fs_put_page(page, 1)
+ * error: nothing
+ */
static int read_node_page(struct page *page, int type)
{
struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_SB(page->mapping->host->i_sb);
@@ -859,10 +865,8 @@ static int read_node_page(struct page *page, int
type)
return -ENOENT;
}
- if (PageUptodate(page)) {
- unlock_page(page);
- return 0;
- }
+ if (PageUptodate(page))
+ return LOCKED_PAGE;
return f2fs_readpage(sbi, page, ni.blk_addr, type);
}
@@ -874,6 +878,7 @@ void ra_node_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t
nid)
{
struct address_space *mapping = sbi->node_inode->i_mapping;
struct page *apage;
+ int err;
apage = find_get_page(mapping, nid);
if (apage && PageUptodate(apage)) {
@@ -886,30 +891,36 @@ void ra_node_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t
nid)
if (!apage)
return;
- if (read_node_page(apage, READA) == 0)
+ err = read_node_page(page, READA);
+ if (err == 0)
f2fs_put_page(apage, 0);
+ else if (err == LOCKED_PAGE)
+ f2fs_put_page(apage, 1);
return;
}
struct page *get_node_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, pgoff_t nid)
{
- int err;
- struct page *page;
struct address_space *mapping = sbi->node_inode->i_mapping;
+ struct page *page;
+ int err;
page = grab_cache_page(mapping, nid);
if (!page)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
err = read_node_page(page, READ_SYNC);
- if (err)
- return ERR_PTR(err);
+ if (err < 0)
+ return ERR_PTR(ret);
+ else if (err == LOCKED_PAGE)
+ goto got_it;
lock_page(page);
if (!PageUptodate(page)) {
f2fs_put_page(page, 1);
return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
}
+got_it:
BUG_ON(nid != nid_of_node(page));
mark_page_accessed(page);
return page;
@@ -923,10 +934,9 @@ struct page *get_node_page_ra(struct page *parent,
int start)
{
struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_SB(parent->mapping->host->i_sb);
struct address_space *mapping = sbi->node_inode->i_mapping;
- int i, end;
- int err = 0;
- nid_t nid;
struct page *page;
+ int err, i, end;
+ nid_t nid;
/* First, try getting the desired direct node. */
nid = get_nid(parent, start, false);
@@ -936,12 +946,12 @@ struct page *get_node_page_ra(struct page *parent,
int start)
page = grab_cache_page(mapping, nid);
if (!page)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
- else if (PageUptodate(page))
- goto page_hit;
err = read_node_page(page, READ_SYNC);
- if (err)
- return ERR_PTR(err);
+ if (err < 0)
+ return ERR_PTR(ret);
+ else if (err == LOCKED_PAGE)
+ goto page_hit;
/* Then, try readahead for siblings of the desired node */
end = start + MAX_RA_NODE;
@@ -956,7 +966,7 @@ struct page *get_node_page_ra(struct page *parent,
int start)
lock_page(page);
page_hit:
- if (PageError(page)) {
+ if (!PageUptodate(page)) {
f2fs_put_page(page, 1);
return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
}
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.h b/fs/f2fs/node.h
index d009cdf..271a61c 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.h
@@ -29,6 +29,9 @@
/* vector size for gang look-up from nat cache that consists of radix
tree */
#define NATVEC_SIZE 64
+/* return value for read_node_page */
+#define LOCKED_PAGE 1
+
/*
* For node information
*/
--
1.8.1.3.566.gaa39828
--
Jaegeuk Kim
Samsung
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-03 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-01 6:55 [PATCH 1/9] f2fs: do not use duplicate names in a macro Jaegeuk Kim
2013-04-01 6:55 ` [PATCH 2/9] f2fs: introduce TOTAL_SECS macro Jaegeuk Kim
2013-04-03 1:17 ` Namjae Jeon
2013-04-01 6:55 ` [PATCH 3/9] f2fs: remove redundant lock_page calls Jaegeuk Kim
2013-04-03 5:58 ` Namjae Jeon
2013-04-03 8:12 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2013-04-03 8:27 ` [PATCH 3/9 v2] " Namjae Jeon
2013-04-01 6:55 ` [PATCH 4/9] f2fs: allocate new segment aligned with sections Jaegeuk Kim
2013-04-03 6:00 ` Namjae Jeon
2013-04-01 6:55 ` [PATCH 5/9] f2fs: change GC bitmaps to apply the section granularity Jaegeuk Kim
2013-04-03 5:46 ` Namjae Jeon
2013-04-03 8:06 ` [PATCH 5/9 v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
2013-04-03 8:21 ` Namjae Jeon
2013-04-01 6:55 ` [PATCH 6/9] f2fs: check completion of foreground GC Jaegeuk Kim
2013-04-03 5:54 ` Namjae Jeon
2013-04-01 6:55 ` [PATCH 7/9] f2fs: allocate remained free segments in the LFS mode Jaegeuk Kim
2013-04-03 5:59 ` Namjae Jeon
2013-04-01 6:55 ` [PATCH 8/9] f2fs: avoid race for summary information Jaegeuk Kim
2013-04-03 5:54 ` Namjae Jeon
2013-04-01 6:56 ` [PATCH 9/9] f2fs: fix the bitmap consistency of dirty segments Jaegeuk Kim
2013-04-03 1:14 ` Namjae Jeon
2013-04-03 1:15 ` [PATCH 1/9] f2fs: do not use duplicate names in a macro Namjae Jeon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1364976769.4353.11.camel@kjgkr \
--to=jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linkinjeon@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).