From: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org>
To: <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
<kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 24/31] list_lru: per-memcg walks
Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 22:13:45 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1368382432-25462-25-git-send-email-glommer@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1368382432-25462-1-git-send-email-glommer@openvz.org>
This patch extend the list_lru interfaces to allow for a memcg
parameter. Because most of its users won't need it, instead of
modifying the function signatures we create a new set of _memcg()
functions and write the old API ontop of that.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
include/linux/list_lru.h | 26 ++++++++---
include/linux/memcontrol.h | 2 +
lib/list_lru.c | 110 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
3 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/list_lru.h b/include/linux/list_lru.h
index f6756fb..9e6bbb1 100644
--- a/include/linux/list_lru.h
+++ b/include/linux/list_lru.h
@@ -99,23 +99,37 @@ static inline int list_lru_init_memcg(struct list_lru *lru)
int list_lru_add(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item);
int list_lru_del(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item);
-unsigned long
-list_lru_count_nodemask(struct list_lru *lru, nodemask_t *nodes_to_count);
+
+unsigned long list_lru_count_nodemask_memcg(struct list_lru *lru,
+ nodemask_t *nodes_to_count, struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
+
+static inline unsigned long
+list_lru_count_nodemask(struct list_lru *lru, nodemask_t *nodes_to_count)
+{
+ return list_lru_count_nodemask_memcg(lru, nodes_to_count, NULL);
+}
static inline unsigned long list_lru_count(struct list_lru *lru)
{
return list_lru_count_nodemask(lru, &lru->active_nodes);
}
-
typedef enum lru_status
(*list_lru_walk_cb)(struct list_head *item, spinlock_t *lock, void *cb_arg);
typedef void (*list_lru_dispose_cb)(struct list_head *dispose_list);
-unsigned long
-list_lru_walk_nodemask(struct list_lru *lru, list_lru_walk_cb isolate,
- void *cb_arg, unsigned long nr_to_walk, nodemask_t *nodes_to_walk);
+unsigned long list_lru_walk_nodemask_memcg(struct list_lru *lru,
+ list_lru_walk_cb isolate, void *cb_arg, unsigned long nr_to_walk,
+ nodemask_t *nodes_to_walk, struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
+
+static inline unsigned long list_lru_walk_nodemask(struct list_lru *lru,
+ list_lru_walk_cb isolate, void *cb_arg, unsigned long nr_to_walk,
+ nodemask_t *nodes_to_walk)
+{
+ return list_lru_walk_nodemask_memcg(lru, isolate, cb_arg, nr_to_walk,
+ &lru->active_nodes, NULL);
+}
static inline unsigned long
list_lru_walk(struct list_lru *lru, list_lru_walk_cb isolate,
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index 50f199f..3eeece8 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -593,6 +593,8 @@ static inline bool memcg_kmem_is_active(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
#define for_each_memcg_cache_index(_idx) \
for (; NULL; )
+#define memcg_limited_groups_array_size 0
+
static inline bool memcg_kmem_enabled(void)
{
return false;
diff --git a/lib/list_lru.c b/lib/list_lru.c
index a5753b2..f3a37f5 100644
--- a/lib/list_lru.c
+++ b/lib/list_lru.c
@@ -72,6 +72,23 @@ memcg_kmem_lru_of_page(struct list_lru *lru, struct page *page)
return lru_node_of_index(lru, memcg_id, nid);
}
+/*
+ * This helper will loop through all node-data in the LRU, either global or
+ * per-memcg. If memcg is either not present or not used,
+ * memcg_limited_groups_array_size will be 0. _idx starts at -1, and it will
+ * still be allowed to execute once.
+ *
+ * We convention that for _idx = -1, the global node info should be used.
+ * After that, we will go through each of the memcgs, starting at 0.
+ *
+ * We don't need any kind of locking for the loop because
+ * memcg_limited_groups_array_size can only grow, gaining new fields at the
+ * end. The old ones are just copied, and any interesting manipulation happen
+ * in the node list itself, and we already lock the list.
+ */
+#define for_each_memcg_lru_index(_idx) \
+ for ((_idx) = -1; ((_idx) < memcg_limited_groups_array_size); (_idx)++)
+
int
list_lru_add(
struct list_lru *lru,
@@ -131,13 +148,29 @@ list_lru_del(
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_del);
unsigned long
-list_lru_count_nodemask(struct list_lru *lru, nodemask_t *nodes_to_count)
+list_lru_count_nodemask_memcg(
+ struct list_lru *lru,
+ nodemask_t *nodes_to_count,
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
{
long count = 0;
int nid;
+ nodemask_t nodes;
+ int memcg_id = -1;
+
+ if (memcg && memcg_kmem_is_active(memcg))
+ memcg_id = memcg_cache_id(memcg);
+ /*
+ * Conservative code can call this setting nodes with node_setall.
+ * This will generate an out of bound access for memcg.
+ */
+ nodes_and(nodes, *nodes_to_count, node_online_map);
- for_each_node_mask(nid, *nodes_to_count) {
- struct list_lru_node *nlru = &lru->node[nid];
+ for_each_node_mask(nid, nodes) {
+ struct list_lru_node *nlru;
+ nlru = lru_node_of_index(lru, memcg_id, nid);
+ if (!nlru)
+ continue;
spin_lock(&nlru->lock);
BUG_ON(nlru->nr_items < 0);
@@ -147,17 +180,17 @@ list_lru_count_nodemask(struct list_lru *lru, nodemask_t *nodes_to_count)
return count;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_count_nodemask);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_count_nodemask_memcg);
static unsigned long
list_lru_walk_node(
struct list_lru *lru,
+ struct list_lru_node *nlru,
int nid,
list_lru_walk_cb isolate,
void *cb_arg,
unsigned long *nr_to_walk)
{
- struct list_lru_node *nlru = &lru->node[nid];
struct list_head *item, *n;
unsigned long isolated = 0;
@@ -197,25 +230,41 @@ restart:
}
unsigned long
-list_lru_walk_nodemask(
- struct list_lru *lru,
- list_lru_walk_cb isolate,
- void *cb_arg,
- unsigned long nr_to_walk,
- nodemask_t *nodes_to_walk)
+list_lru_walk_nodemask_memcg(
+ struct list_lru *lru,
+ list_lru_walk_cb isolate,
+ void *cb_arg,
+ unsigned long nr_to_walk,
+ nodemask_t *nodes_to_walk,
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
{
long isolated = 0;
int nid;
+ nodemask_t nodes;
+ int memcg_id = -1;
+ struct list_lru_node *nlru;
- for_each_node_mask(nid, *nodes_to_walk) {
- isolated += list_lru_walk_node(lru, nid, isolate,
+ if (memcg && memcg_kmem_is_active(memcg))
+ memcg_id = memcg_cache_id(memcg);
+ /*
+ * Conservative code can call this setting nodes with node_setall.
+ * This will generate an out of bound access for memcg.
+ */
+ nodes_and(nodes, *nodes_to_walk, node_online_map);
+
+ for_each_node_mask(nid, nodes) {
+ nlru = lru_node_of_index(lru, memcg_id, nid);
+ if (!nlru)
+ continue;
+
+ isolated += list_lru_walk_node(lru, nlru, nid, isolate,
cb_arg, &nr_to_walk);
if (nr_to_walk <= 0)
break;
}
return isolated;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_walk_nodemask);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_walk_nodemask_memcg);
static unsigned long
list_lru_dispose_all_node(
@@ -223,23 +272,34 @@ list_lru_dispose_all_node(
int nid,
list_lru_dispose_cb dispose)
{
- struct list_lru_node *nlru = &lru->node[nid];
+ struct list_lru_node *nlru;
LIST_HEAD(dispose_list);
unsigned long disposed = 0;
+ int idx;
- spin_lock(&nlru->lock);
- while (!list_empty(&nlru->list)) {
- list_splice_init(&nlru->list, &dispose_list);
- disposed += nlru->nr_items;
- nlru->nr_items = 0;
- node_clear(nid, lru->active_nodes);
- spin_unlock(&nlru->lock);
-
- dispose(&dispose_list);
+ for_each_memcg_lru_index(idx) {
+ nlru = lru_node_of_index(lru, idx, nid);
+ if (!nlru)
+ continue;
spin_lock(&nlru->lock);
+ while (!list_empty(&nlru->list)) {
+ list_splice_init(&nlru->list, &dispose_list);
+
+ if (atomic_long_sub_and_test(nlru->nr_items,
+ &lru->node_totals[nid]))
+ node_clear(nid, lru->active_nodes);
+ disposed += nlru->nr_items;
+ nlru->nr_items = 0;
+ spin_unlock(&nlru->lock);
+
+ dispose(&dispose_list);
+
+ spin_lock(&nlru->lock);
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&nlru->lock);
}
- spin_unlock(&nlru->lock);
+
return disposed;
}
--
1.8.1.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-12 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-12 18:13 [PATCH v6 00/31] kmemcg shrinkers Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 01/31] super: fix calculation of shrinkable objects for small numbers Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 02/31] dcache: convert dentry_stat.nr_unused to per-cpu counters Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 03/31] dentry: move to per-sb LRU locks Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 04/31] dcache: remove dentries from LRU before putting on dispose list Glauber Costa
2013-05-14 2:02 ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-14 5:46 ` [PATCH v7 " Dave Chinner
2013-05-14 7:10 ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-14 12:43 ` Glauber Costa
[not found] ` <51923158.7040002-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-14 20:32 ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 05/31] mm: new shrinker API Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 06/31] shrinker: convert superblock shrinkers to new API Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 07/31] list: add a new LRU list type Glauber Costa
2013-05-13 9:25 ` Mel Gorman
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 08/31] inode: convert inode lru list to generic lru list code Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 09/31] dcache: convert to use new lru list infrastructure Glauber Costa
[not found] ` <1368382432-25462-10-git-send-email-glommer-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-14 6:59 ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-14 7:50 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-14 14:01 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 10/31] list_lru: per-node " Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 11/31] shrinker: add node awareness Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 12/31] fs: convert inode and dentry shrinking to be node aware Glauber Costa
[not found] ` <1368382432-25462-13-git-send-email-glommer-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-14 9:52 ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-15 15:27 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-16 0:02 ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-16 8:03 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-16 19:14 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-17 0:51 ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-17 7:29 ` Glauber Costa
[not found] ` <5195DC59.8000205-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-17 14:49 ` Glauber Costa
[not found] ` <51964381.8010406-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-17 22:54 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-18 3:39 ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-18 7:20 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 13/31] xfs: convert buftarg LRU to generic code Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 14/31] xfs: convert dquot cache lru to list_lru Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 15/31] fs: convert fs shrinkers to new scan/count API Glauber Costa
2013-05-13 6:12 ` Artem Bityutskiy
[not found] ` <1368425530.3208.13.camel-Bxnoe/o8FG+Ef9UqXRslZEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-13 7:28 ` Glauber Costa
[not found] ` <51909610.1010801-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-13 7:43 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2013-05-13 10:36 ` Jan Kara
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 16/31] drivers: convert shrinkers to new count/scan API Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 17/31] i915: bail out earlier when shrinker cannot acquire mutex Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 18/31] shrinker: convert remaining shrinkers to count/scan API Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 19/31] hugepage: convert huge zero page shrinker to new shrinker API Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 20/31] shrinker: Kill old ->shrink API Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 21/31] vmscan: also shrink slab in memcg pressure Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 22/31] memcg,list_lru: duplicate LRUs upon kmemcg creation Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 23/31] lru: add an element to a memcg list Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 25/31] memcg: per-memcg kmem shrinking Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 26/31] memcg: scan cache objects hierarchically Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 27/31] vmscan: take at least one pass with shrinkers Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 28/31] super: targeted memcg reclaim Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 29/31] memcg: move initialization to memcg creation Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 30/31] vmpressure: in-kernel notifications Glauber Costa
2013-05-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v6 31/31] memcg: reap dead memcgs upon global memory pressure Glauber Costa
2013-05-13 7:14 ` [PATCH v6 00/31] kmemcg shrinkers Dave Chinner
2013-05-13 7:21 ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-13 8:00 ` Glauber Costa
[not found] ` <51909D84.7040800-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-14 1:48 ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-14 5:22 ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-14 5:45 ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-14 7:38 ` Glauber Costa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1368382432-25462-25-git-send-email-glommer@openvz.org \
--to=glommer@openvz.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).