* [PATCH 0/8] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd followup V3
@ 2013-05-29 23:17 Mel Gorman
2013-05-29 23:17 ` [PATCH 1/8] mm: vmscan: Block kswapd if it is encountering pages under writeback -fix Mel Gorman
` (9 more replies)
0 siblings, 10 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mel Gorman @ 2013-05-29 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: Jiri Slaby, Valdis Kletnieks, Rik van Riel, Zlatko Calusic,
Johannes Weiner, dormando, Michal Hocko, Jan Kara, Dave Chinner,
Kamezawa Hiroyuki, Linux-FSDevel, Linux-MM, LKML, Mel Gorman
tldr; Overall the system is getting less kicked in the face. Scan rates
between zones is often more balanced than it used to be. There are
now fewer writes from reclaim context and a reduction in IO wait
times.
This series replaces all of the previous follow-up series. It was clear
that more of the stall logic needed to be in the same place so it is
comprehensible and easier to predict.
Changelog since V2
o Consolidate stall decisions into one place
o Add is_dirty_writeback for NFS
o Move accounting around
Further testing of the "Reduce system disruption due to kswapd" discovered
a few problems. First and foremost, it's possible for pages under writeback
to be freed which will lead to badness. Second, as pages were not being
swapped the file LRU was being scanned faster and clean file pages were
being reclaimed. In some cases this results in increased read IO to re-read
data from disk. Third, more pages were being written from kswapd context
which can adversly affect IO performance. Lastly, it was observed that
PageDirty pages are not necessarily dirty on all filesystems (buffers can be
clean while PageDirty is set and ->writepage generates no IO) and not all
filesystems set PageWriteback when the page is being written (e.g. ext3).
This disconnect confuses the reclaim stalling logic. This follow-up series
is aimed at these problems.
The tests were based on three kernels
vanilla: kernel 3.9 as that is what the current mmotm uses as a baseline
mmotm-20130522 is mmotm as of 22nd May with "Reduce system disruption due to
kswapd" applied on top as per what should be in Andrew's tree
right now
lessdisrupt-v7r10 is this follow-up series on top of the mmotm kernel
The first test used memcached+memcachetest while some background IO
was in progress as implemented by the parallel IO tests implement in
MM Tests. memcachetest benchmarks how many operations/second memcached
can service. It starts with no background IO on a freshly created ext4
filesystem and then re-runs the test with larger amounts of IO in the
background to roughly simulate a large copy in progress. The expectation
is that the IO should have little or no impact on memcachetest which is
running entirely in memory.
parallelio
3.9.0 3.9.0 3.9.0
vanilla mm1-mmotm-20130522 mm1-lessdisrupt-v7r10
Ops memcachetest-0M 23117.00 ( 0.00%) 22780.00 ( -1.46%) 22763.00 ( -1.53%)
Ops memcachetest-715M 23774.00 ( 0.00%) 23299.00 ( -2.00%) 22934.00 ( -3.53%)
Ops memcachetest-2385M 4208.00 ( 0.00%) 24154.00 (474.00%) 23765.00 (464.76%)
Ops memcachetest-4055M 4104.00 ( 0.00%) 25130.00 (512.33%) 24614.00 (499.76%)
Ops io-duration-0M 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops io-duration-715M 12.00 ( 0.00%) 7.00 ( 41.67%) 6.00 ( 50.00%)
Ops io-duration-2385M 116.00 ( 0.00%) 21.00 ( 81.90%) 21.00 ( 81.90%)
Ops io-duration-4055M 160.00 ( 0.00%) 36.00 ( 77.50%) 35.00 ( 78.12%)
Ops swaptotal-0M 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops swaptotal-715M 140138.00 ( 0.00%) 18.00 ( 99.99%) 18.00 ( 99.99%)
Ops swaptotal-2385M 385682.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops swaptotal-4055M 418029.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops swapin-0M 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops swapin-715M 144.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops swapin-2385M 134227.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops swapin-4055M 125618.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops minorfaults-0M 1536429.00 ( 0.00%) 1531632.00 ( 0.31%) 1533541.00 ( 0.19%)
Ops minorfaults-715M 1786996.00 ( 0.00%) 1612148.00 ( 9.78%) 1608832.00 ( 9.97%)
Ops minorfaults-2385M 1757952.00 ( 0.00%) 1614874.00 ( 8.14%) 1613541.00 ( 8.21%)
Ops minorfaults-4055M 1774460.00 ( 0.00%) 1633400.00 ( 7.95%) 1630881.00 ( 8.09%)
Ops majorfaults-0M 1.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops majorfaults-715M 184.00 ( 0.00%) 167.00 ( 9.24%) 166.00 ( 9.78%)
Ops majorfaults-2385M 24444.00 ( 0.00%) 155.00 ( 99.37%) 93.00 ( 99.62%)
Ops majorfaults-4055M 21357.00 ( 0.00%) 147.00 ( 99.31%) 134.00 ( 99.37%)
memcachetest is the transactions/second reported by memcachetest. In
the vanilla kernel note that performance drops from around
23K/sec to just over 4K/second when there is 2385M of IO going
on in the background. With current mmotm, there is no collapse
in performance and with this follow-up series there is little
change.
swaptotal is the total amount of swap traffic. With mmotm and the follow-up
series, the total amount of swapping is much reduced.
3.9.0 3.9.0 3.9.0
vanillamm1-mmotm-20130522mm1-lessdisrupt-v7r10
Minor Faults 11160152 10706748 10622316
Major Faults 46305 755 678
Swap Ins 260249 0 0
Swap Outs 683860 18 18
Direct pages scanned 0 678 2520
Kswapd pages scanned 6046108 8814900 1639279
Kswapd pages reclaimed 1081954 1172267 1094635
Direct pages reclaimed 0 566 2304
Kswapd efficiency 17% 13% 66%
Kswapd velocity 5217.560 7618.953 1414.879
Direct efficiency 100% 83% 91%
Direct velocity 0.000 0.586 2.175
Percentage direct scans 0% 0% 0%
Zone normal velocity 5105.086 6824.681 671.158
Zone dma32 velocity 112.473 794.858 745.896
Zone dma velocity 0.000 0.000 0.000
Page writes by reclaim 1929612.000 6861768.000 32821.000
Page writes file 1245752 6861750 32803
Page writes anon 683860 18 18
Page reclaim immediate 7484 40 239
Sector Reads 1130320 93996 86900
Sector Writes 13508052 10823500 11804436
Page rescued immediate 0 0 0
Slabs scanned 33536 27136 18560
Direct inode steals 0 0 0
Kswapd inode steals 8641 1035 0
Kswapd skipped wait 0 0 0
THP fault alloc 8 37 33
THP collapse alloc 508 552 515
THP splits 24 1 1
THP fault fallback 0 0 0
THP collapse fail 0 0 0
There are a number of observations to make here
1. Swap outs are almost eliminated. Swap ins are 0 indicating that the
pages swapped were really unused anonymous pages. Related to that,
major faults are much reduced.
2. kswapd efficiency was impacted by the initial series but with these
follow-up patches, the efficiency is now at 66% indicating that far
fewer pages were skipped during scanning due to dirty or writeback
pages.
3. kswapd velocity is reduced indicating that fewer pages are being scanned
with the follow-up series as kswapd now stalls when the tail of the
LRU queue is full of unqueued dirty pages. The stall gives flushers a
chance to catch-up so kswapd can reclaim clean pages when it wakes
4. In light of Zlatko's recent reports about zone scanning imbalances,
mmtests now reports scanning velocity on a per-zone basis. With mainline,
you can see that the scanning activity is dominated by the Normal
zone with over 45 times more scanning in Normal than the DMA32 zone.
With the series currently in mmotm, the ratio is slightly better but it
is still the case that the bulk of scanning is in the highest zone. With
this follow-up series, the ratio of scanning between the Normal and
DMA32 zone is roughly equal.
5. As Dave Chinner observed, the current patches in mmotm increased the
number of pages written from kswapd context which is expected to adversly
impact IO performance. With the follow-up patches, far fewer pages are
written from kswapd context than the mainline kernel
6. With the series in mmotm, fewer inodes were reclaimed by kswapd. With
the follow-up series, there is less slab shrinking activity and no inodes
were reclaimed.
7. Note that "Sectors Read" is drastically reduced implying that the source
data being used for the IO is not being aggressively discarded due to
page reclaim skipping over dirty pages and reclaiming clean pages. Note
that the reducion in reads could also be due to inode data not being
re-read from disk after a slab shrink.
3.9.0 3.9.0 3.9.0
vanillamm1-mmotm-20130522mm1-lessdisrupt-v7r10
Mean sda-avgqz 166.99 32.09 33.44
Mean sda-await 853.64 192.76 185.43
Mean sda-r_await 6.31 9.24 5.97
Mean sda-w_await 2992.81 202.65 192.43
Max sda-avgqz 1409.91 718.75 698.98
Max sda-await 6665.74 3538.00 3124.23
Max sda-r_await 58.96 111.95 58.00
Max sda-w_await 28458.94 3977.29 3148.61
In light of the changes in writes from reclaim context, the number of
reads and Dave Chinner's concerns about IO performance I took a closer
look at the IO stats for the test disk. Few observations
1. The average queue size is reduced by the initial series and roughly
the same with this follow up.
2. Average wait times for writes are reduced and as the IO
is completing faster it at least implies that the gain is because
flushers are writing the files efficiently instead of page reclaim
getting in the way.
3. The reduction in maximum write latency is staggering. 28 seconds down
to 3 seconds.
Jan Kara asked how NFS is affected by all of this. Unstable pages can
be taken into account as one of the patches in the series shows but it
is still the case that filesystems with unusual handling of dirty or
writeback could still be treated better.
Tests like postmark, fsmark and largedd showed up nothing useful. On my test
setup, pages are simply not being written back from reclaim context with or
without the patches and there are no changes in performance. My test setup
probably is just not strong enough network-wise to be really interesting.
I ran a longer-lived memcached test with IO going to NFS instead of a local disk
parallelio
3.9.0 3.9.0 3.9.0
vanilla mm1-mmotm-20130522 mm1-lessdisrupt-v7r10
Ops memcachetest-0M 23323.00 ( 0.00%) 23241.00 ( -0.35%) 23321.00 ( -0.01%)
Ops memcachetest-715M 25526.00 ( 0.00%) 24763.00 ( -2.99%) 23242.00 ( -8.95%)
Ops memcachetest-2385M 8814.00 ( 0.00%) 26924.00 (205.47%) 23521.00 (166.86%)
Ops memcachetest-4055M 5835.00 ( 0.00%) 26827.00 (359.76%) 25560.00 (338.05%)
Ops io-duration-0M 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops io-duration-715M 65.00 ( 0.00%) 71.00 ( -9.23%) 11.00 ( 83.08%)
Ops io-duration-2385M 129.00 ( 0.00%) 94.00 ( 27.13%) 53.00 ( 58.91%)
Ops io-duration-4055M 301.00 ( 0.00%) 100.00 ( 66.78%) 108.00 ( 64.12%)
Ops swaptotal-0M 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops swaptotal-715M 14394.00 ( 0.00%) 949.00 ( 93.41%) 63.00 ( 99.56%)
Ops swaptotal-2385M 401483.00 ( 0.00%) 24437.00 ( 93.91%) 30118.00 ( 92.50%)
Ops swaptotal-4055M 554123.00 ( 0.00%) 35688.00 ( 93.56%) 63082.00 ( 88.62%)
Ops swapin-0M 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops swapin-715M 4522.00 ( 0.00%) 560.00 ( 87.62%) 63.00 ( 98.61%)
Ops swapin-2385M 169861.00 ( 0.00%) 5026.00 ( 97.04%) 13917.00 ( 91.81%)
Ops swapin-4055M 192374.00 ( 0.00%) 10056.00 ( 94.77%) 25729.00 ( 86.63%)
Ops minorfaults-0M 1445969.00 ( 0.00%) 1520878.00 ( -5.18%) 1454024.00 ( -0.56%)
Ops minorfaults-715M 1557288.00 ( 0.00%) 1528482.00 ( 1.85%) 1535776.00 ( 1.38%)
Ops minorfaults-2385M 1692896.00 ( 0.00%) 1570523.00 ( 7.23%) 1559622.00 ( 7.87%)
Ops minorfaults-4055M 1654985.00 ( 0.00%) 1581456.00 ( 4.44%) 1596713.00 ( 3.52%)
Ops majorfaults-0M 0.00 ( 0.00%) 1.00 (-99.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops majorfaults-715M 763.00 ( 0.00%) 265.00 ( 65.27%) 75.00 ( 90.17%)
Ops majorfaults-2385M 23861.00 ( 0.00%) 894.00 ( 96.25%) 2189.00 ( 90.83%)
Ops majorfaults-4055M 27210.00 ( 0.00%) 1569.00 ( 94.23%) 4088.00 ( 84.98%)
1. Performance does not collapse due to IO which is good. IO is also completing
faster. Note with mmotm, IO completes in a third of the time and faster again
with this series applied
2. Swapping is reduced, although not eliminated. The figures for the follow-up
look bad but it does vary a bit as the stalling is not perfect for nfs
or filesystems like ext3 with unusual handling of dirty and writeback
pages
3. There are swapins, particularly with larger amounts of IO indicating
that active pages are being reclaimed. However, the number of much
reduced.
3.9.0 3.9.0 3.9.0
vanillamm1-mmotm-20130522mm1-lessdisrupt-v7r10
Minor Faults 36339175 35025445 35219699
Major Faults 310964 27108 51887
Swap Ins 2176399 173069 333316
Swap Outs 3344050 357228 504824
Direct pages scanned 8972 77283 43242
Kswapd pages scanned 20899983 8939566 14772851
Kswapd pages reclaimed 6193156 5172605 5231026
Direct pages reclaimed 8450 73802 39514
Kswapd efficiency 29% 57% 35%
Kswapd velocity 3929.743 1847.499 3058.840
Direct efficiency 94% 95% 91%
Direct velocity 1.687 15.972 8.954
Percentage direct scans 0% 0% 0%
Zone normal velocity 3721.907 939.103 2185.142
Zone dma32 velocity 209.522 924.368 882.651
Zone dma velocity 0.000 0.000 0.000
Page writes by reclaim 4082185.000 526319.000 537114.000
Page writes file 738135 169091 32290
Page writes anon 3344050 357228 504824
Page reclaim immediate 9524 170 5595843
Sector Reads 8909900 861192 1483680
Sector Writes 13428980 1488744 2076800
Page rescued immediate 0 0 0
Slabs scanned 38016 31744 28672
Direct inode steals 0 0 0
Kswapd inode steals 424 0 0
Kswapd skipped wait 0 0 0
THP fault alloc 14 15 119
THP collapse alloc 1767 1569 1618
THP splits 30 29 25
THP fault fallback 0 0 0
THP collapse fail 8 5 0
Compaction stalls 17 41 100
Compaction success 7 31 95
Compaction failures 10 10 5
Page migrate success 7083 22157 62217
Page migrate failure 0 0 0
Compaction pages isolated 14847 48758 135830
Compaction migrate scanned 18328 48398 138929
Compaction free scanned 2000255 355827 1720269
Compaction cost 7 24 68
I guess the main takeaway again is the much reduced page writes
from reclaim context and reduced reads.
3.9.0 3.9.0 3.9.0
vanillamm1-mmotm-20130522mm1-lessdisrupt-v7r10
Mean sda-avgqz 23.58 0.35 0.44
Mean sda-await 133.47 15.72 15.46
Mean sda-r_await 4.72 4.69 3.95
Mean sda-w_await 507.69 28.40 33.68
Max sda-avgqz 680.60 12.25 23.14
Max sda-await 3958.89 221.83 286.22
Max sda-r_await 63.86 61.23 67.29
Max sda-w_await 11710.38 883.57 1767.28
And as before, write wait times are much reduced.
fs/block_dev.c | 1 +
fs/buffer.c | 34 +++++++++
fs/ext3/inode.c | 1 +
fs/nfs/file.c | 30 ++++++++
include/linux/buffer_head.h | 3 +
include/linux/fs.h | 1 +
mm/vmscan.c | 164 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
7 files changed, 189 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
--
1.8.1.4
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/8] mm: vmscan: Block kswapd if it is encountering pages under writeback -fix
2013-05-29 23:17 [PATCH 0/8] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd followup V3 Mel Gorman
@ 2013-05-29 23:17 ` Mel Gorman
2013-05-29 23:17 ` [PATCH 2/8] mm: vmscan: Stall page reclaim and writeback pages based on dirty/writepage pages encountered Mel Gorman
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mel Gorman @ 2013-05-29 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: Jiri Slaby, Valdis Kletnieks, Rik van Riel, Zlatko Calusic,
Johannes Weiner, dormando, Michal Hocko, Jan Kara, Dave Chinner,
Kamezawa Hiroyuki, Linux-FSDevel, Linux-MM, LKML, Mel Gorman
The patch "mm: vmscan: Block kswapd if it is encountering pages
under writeback" stalls in congestion_wait it encounters a page under
writeback that is marked for immediate reclaim. Initially this was a
wait_on_page_writeback() but after the switch to congestion_wait(),
there is no guarantee the page has completed writeback and it can
be placed on a list for freeing.
This is a fix for
mm-vmscan-block-kswapd-if-it-is-encountering-pages-under-writeback.patch
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index b1b38ad..4a43c28 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -766,8 +766,10 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
if (current_is_kswapd() &&
PageReclaim(page) &&
zone_is_reclaim_writeback(zone)) {
+ unlock_page(page);
congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
zone_clear_flag(zone, ZONE_WRITEBACK);
+ goto keep;
/* Case 2 above */
} else if (global_reclaim(sc) ||
--
1.8.1.4
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/8] mm: vmscan: Stall page reclaim and writeback pages based on dirty/writepage pages encountered
2013-05-29 23:17 [PATCH 0/8] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd followup V3 Mel Gorman
2013-05-29 23:17 ` [PATCH 1/8] mm: vmscan: Block kswapd if it is encountering pages under writeback -fix Mel Gorman
@ 2013-05-29 23:17 ` Mel Gorman
2013-05-29 23:17 ` [PATCH 3/8] mm: vmscan: Stall page reclaim after a list of pages have been processed Mel Gorman
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mel Gorman @ 2013-05-29 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: Jiri Slaby, Valdis Kletnieks, Rik van Riel, Zlatko Calusic,
Johannes Weiner, dormando, Michal Hocko, Jan Kara, Dave Chinner,
Kamezawa Hiroyuki, Linux-FSDevel, Linux-MM, LKML, Mel Gorman
The patch "mm: vmscan: Have kswapd writeback pages based on dirty pages
encountered, not priority" decides whether to writeback pages from reclaim
context based on the number of dirty pages encountered. This situation
is flagged too easily and flushers are not given the chance to catch up
resulting in more pages being written from reclaim context and potentially
impacting IO performance. The check for PageWriteback is also misplaced as
it happens within a PageDirty check which is nonsense as the dirty may have
been cleared for IO. The accounting is updated very late and pages that are
already under writeback, were reactivated, could not unmapped or could not
be released are all missed. Similarly, a page is considered congested for
reasons other than being congested and pages that cannot be written out
in the correct context are skipped. Finally, it considers stalling and
writing back filesystem pages due to encountering dirty anonymous pages
at the tail of the LRU which is dumb.
This patch causes kswapd to begin writing filesystem pages from reclaim
context only if page reclaim found that all filesystem pages at the tail of
the LRU were unqueued dirty pages. Before it starts writing filesystem pages,
it will stall to give flushers a chance to catch up. The decision on whether
wait_iff_congested is also now determined by dirty filesystem pages only.
Congested pages are based on whether the underlying BDI is congested
regardless of the context of the reclaiming process.
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 4a43c28..999ef0b 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -669,6 +669,25 @@ static enum page_references page_check_references(struct page *page,
return PAGEREF_RECLAIM;
}
+/* Check if a page is dirty or under writeback */
+static void page_check_dirty_writeback(struct page *page,
+ bool *dirty, bool *writeback)
+{
+ /*
+ * Anonymous pages are not handled by flushers and must be written
+ * from reclaim context. Do not stall reclaim based on them
+ */
+ if (!page_is_file_cache(page)) {
+ *dirty = false;
+ *writeback = false;
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /* By default assume that the page flags are accurate */
+ *dirty = PageDirty(page);
+ *writeback = PageWriteback(page);
+}
+
/*
* shrink_page_list() returns the number of reclaimed pages
*/
@@ -697,6 +716,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
struct page *page;
int may_enter_fs;
enum page_references references = PAGEREF_RECLAIM_CLEAN;
+ bool dirty, writeback;
cond_resched();
@@ -725,6 +745,24 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
(PageSwapCache(page) && (sc->gfp_mask & __GFP_IO));
/*
+ * The number of dirty pages determines if a zone is marked
+ * reclaim_congested which affects wait_iff_congested. kswapd
+ * will stall and start writing pages if the tail of the LRU
+ * is all dirty unqueued pages.
+ */
+ page_check_dirty_writeback(page, &dirty, &writeback);
+ if (dirty || writeback)
+ nr_dirty++;
+
+ if (dirty && !writeback)
+ nr_unqueued_dirty++;
+
+ /* Treat this page as congested if underlying BDI is */
+ mapping = page_mapping(page);
+ if (mapping && bdi_write_congested(mapping->backing_dev_info))
+ nr_congested++;
+
+ /*
* If a page at the tail of the LRU is under writeback, there
* are three cases to consider.
*
@@ -819,9 +857,10 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
if (!add_to_swap(page, page_list))
goto activate_locked;
may_enter_fs = 1;
- }
- mapping = page_mapping(page);
+ /* Adding to swap updated mapping */
+ mapping = page_mapping(page);
+ }
/*
* The page is mapped into the page tables of one or more
@@ -841,11 +880,6 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
}
if (PageDirty(page)) {
- nr_dirty++;
-
- if (!PageWriteback(page))
- nr_unqueued_dirty++;
-
/*
* Only kswapd can writeback filesystem pages to
* avoid risk of stack overflow but only writeback
@@ -876,7 +910,6 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
/* Page is dirty, try to write it out here */
switch (pageout(page, mapping, sc)) {
case PAGE_KEEP:
- nr_congested++;
goto keep_locked;
case PAGE_ACTIVATE:
goto activate_locked;
@@ -1318,7 +1351,7 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
unsigned long nr_scanned;
unsigned long nr_reclaimed = 0;
unsigned long nr_taken;
- unsigned long nr_dirty = 0;
+ unsigned long nr_unqueued_dirty = 0;
unsigned long nr_writeback = 0;
isolate_mode_t isolate_mode = 0;
int file = is_file_lru(lru);
@@ -1361,7 +1394,7 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
return 0;
nr_reclaimed = shrink_page_list(&page_list, zone, sc, TTU_UNMAP,
- &nr_dirty, &nr_writeback, false);
+ &nr_unqueued_dirty, &nr_writeback, false);
spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
@@ -1416,11 +1449,13 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
/*
* Similarly, if many dirty pages are encountered that are not
* currently being written then flag that kswapd should start
- * writing back pages.
+ * writing back pages and stall to give a chance for flushers
+ * to catch up.
*/
- if (global_reclaim(sc) && nr_dirty &&
- nr_dirty >= (nr_taken >> (DEF_PRIORITY - sc->priority)))
+ if (global_reclaim(sc) && nr_unqueued_dirty == nr_taken) {
+ congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
zone_set_flag(zone, ZONE_TAIL_LRU_DIRTY);
+ }
trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive(zone->zone_pgdat->node_id,
zone_idx(zone),
--
1.8.1.4
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/8] mm: vmscan: Stall page reclaim after a list of pages have been processed
2013-05-29 23:17 [PATCH 0/8] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd followup V3 Mel Gorman
2013-05-29 23:17 ` [PATCH 1/8] mm: vmscan: Block kswapd if it is encountering pages under writeback -fix Mel Gorman
2013-05-29 23:17 ` [PATCH 2/8] mm: vmscan: Stall page reclaim and writeback pages based on dirty/writepage pages encountered Mel Gorman
@ 2013-05-29 23:17 ` Mel Gorman
2013-05-29 23:17 ` [PATCH 4/8] mm: vmscan: Set zone flags before blocking Mel Gorman
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mel Gorman @ 2013-05-29 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: Jiri Slaby, Valdis Kletnieks, Rik van Riel, Zlatko Calusic,
Johannes Weiner, dormando, Michal Hocko, Jan Kara, Dave Chinner,
Kamezawa Hiroyuki, Linux-FSDevel, Linux-MM, LKML, Mel Gorman
Commit "mm: vmscan: Block kswapd if it is encountering pages under writeback"
blocks page reclaim if it encounters pages under writeback marked for
immediate reclaim. It blocks while pages are still isolated from the
LRU which is unnecessary. This patch defers the blocking until after the
isolated pages have been processed and tidies up some of the comments.
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 999ef0b..5b1a79c 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -697,6 +697,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
enum ttu_flags ttu_flags,
unsigned long *ret_nr_unqueued_dirty,
unsigned long *ret_nr_writeback,
+ unsigned long *ret_nr_immediate,
bool force_reclaim)
{
LIST_HEAD(ret_pages);
@@ -707,6 +708,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
unsigned long nr_congested = 0;
unsigned long nr_reclaimed = 0;
unsigned long nr_writeback = 0;
+ unsigned long nr_immediate = 0;
cond_resched();
@@ -773,8 +775,8 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
* IO can complete. Waiting on the page itself risks an
* indefinite stall if it is impossible to writeback the
* page due to IO error or disconnected storage so instead
- * block for HZ/10 or until some IO completes then clear the
- * ZONE_WRITEBACK flag to recheck if the condition exists.
+ * note that the LRU is being scanned too quickly and the
+ * caller can stall after page list has been processed.
*
* 2) Global reclaim encounters a page, memcg encounters a
* page that is not marked for immediate reclaim or
@@ -804,10 +806,8 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
if (current_is_kswapd() &&
PageReclaim(page) &&
zone_is_reclaim_writeback(zone)) {
- unlock_page(page);
- congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
- zone_clear_flag(zone, ZONE_WRITEBACK);
- goto keep;
+ nr_immediate++;
+ goto keep_locked;
/* Case 2 above */
} else if (global_reclaim(sc) ||
@@ -1033,6 +1033,7 @@ keep:
mem_cgroup_uncharge_end();
*ret_nr_unqueued_dirty += nr_unqueued_dirty;
*ret_nr_writeback += nr_writeback;
+ *ret_nr_immediate += nr_immediate;
return nr_reclaimed;
}
@@ -1044,7 +1045,7 @@ unsigned long reclaim_clean_pages_from_list(struct zone *zone,
.priority = DEF_PRIORITY,
.may_unmap = 1,
};
- unsigned long ret, dummy1, dummy2;
+ unsigned long ret, dummy1, dummy2, dummy3;
struct page *page, *next;
LIST_HEAD(clean_pages);
@@ -1057,7 +1058,7 @@ unsigned long reclaim_clean_pages_from_list(struct zone *zone,
ret = shrink_page_list(&clean_pages, zone, &sc,
TTU_UNMAP|TTU_IGNORE_ACCESS,
- &dummy1, &dummy2, true);
+ &dummy1, &dummy2, &dummy3, true);
list_splice(&clean_pages, page_list);
__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_FILE, -ret);
return ret;
@@ -1353,6 +1354,7 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
unsigned long nr_taken;
unsigned long nr_unqueued_dirty = 0;
unsigned long nr_writeback = 0;
+ unsigned long nr_immediate = 0;
isolate_mode_t isolate_mode = 0;
int file = is_file_lru(lru);
struct zone *zone = lruvec_zone(lruvec);
@@ -1394,7 +1396,8 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
return 0;
nr_reclaimed = shrink_page_list(&page_list, zone, sc, TTU_UNMAP,
- &nr_unqueued_dirty, &nr_writeback, false);
+ &nr_unqueued_dirty, &nr_writeback, &nr_immediate,
+ false);
spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
@@ -1447,14 +1450,28 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
}
/*
- * Similarly, if many dirty pages are encountered that are not
- * currently being written then flag that kswapd should start
- * writing back pages and stall to give a chance for flushers
- * to catch up.
+ * memcg will stall in page writeback so only consider forcibly
+ * stalling for global reclaim
*/
- if (global_reclaim(sc) && nr_unqueued_dirty == nr_taken) {
- congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
- zone_set_flag(zone, ZONE_TAIL_LRU_DIRTY);
+ if (global_reclaim(sc)) {
+ /*
+ * If dirty pages are scanned that are not queued for IO, it
+ * implies that flushers are not keeping up. In this case, flag
+ * the zone ZONE_TAIL_LRU_DIRTY and kswapd will start writing
+ * pages from reclaim context. It will forcibly stall in the
+ * next check.
+ */
+ if (nr_unqueued_dirty == nr_taken)
+ zone_set_flag(zone, ZONE_TAIL_LRU_DIRTY);
+
+ /*
+ * In addition, if kswapd scans pages marked marked for
+ * immediate reclaim and under writeback (nr_immediate), it
+ * implies that pages are cycling through the LRU faster than
+ * they are written so also forcibly stall.
+ */
+ if (nr_unqueued_dirty == nr_taken || nr_immediate)
+ congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
}
trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive(zone->zone_pgdat->node_id,
--
1.8.1.4
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/8] mm: vmscan: Set zone flags before blocking
2013-05-29 23:17 [PATCH 0/8] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd followup V3 Mel Gorman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2013-05-29 23:17 ` [PATCH 3/8] mm: vmscan: Stall page reclaim after a list of pages have been processed Mel Gorman
@ 2013-05-29 23:17 ` Mel Gorman
2013-05-29 23:17 ` [PATCH 5/8] mm: vmscan: Move direct reclaim wait_iff_congested into shrink_list Mel Gorman
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mel Gorman @ 2013-05-29 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: Jiri Slaby, Valdis Kletnieks, Rik van Riel, Zlatko Calusic,
Johannes Weiner, dormando, Michal Hocko, Jan Kara, Dave Chinner,
Kamezawa Hiroyuki, Linux-FSDevel, Linux-MM, LKML, Mel Gorman
In shrink_page_list a decision may be made to stall and flag a zone
as ZONE_WRITEBACK so that if a large number of unqueued dirty pages are
encountered later then the reclaimer will stall. Set ZONE_WRITEBACK before
potentially going to sleep so it is noticed sooner.
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 5b1a79c..5f80d01 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1445,8 +1445,8 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
*/
if (nr_writeback && nr_writeback >=
(nr_taken >> (DEF_PRIORITY - sc->priority))) {
- wait_iff_congested(zone, BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
zone_set_flag(zone, ZONE_WRITEBACK);
+ wait_iff_congested(zone, BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
}
/*
--
1.8.1.4
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 5/8] mm: vmscan: Move direct reclaim wait_iff_congested into shrink_list
2013-05-29 23:17 [PATCH 0/8] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd followup V3 Mel Gorman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2013-05-29 23:17 ` [PATCH 4/8] mm: vmscan: Set zone flags before blocking Mel Gorman
@ 2013-05-29 23:17 ` Mel Gorman
2013-05-29 23:17 ` [PATCH 6/8] mm: vmscan: Treat pages marked for immediate reclaim as zone congestion Mel Gorman
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mel Gorman @ 2013-05-29 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: Jiri Slaby, Valdis Kletnieks, Rik van Riel, Zlatko Calusic,
Johannes Weiner, dormando, Michal Hocko, Jan Kara, Dave Chinner,
Kamezawa Hiroyuki, Linux-FSDevel, Linux-MM, LKML, Mel Gorman
shrink_inactive_list makes decisions on whether to stall based on the
number of dirty pages encountered. The wait_iff_congested() call in
shrink_page_list does no such thing and it's arbitrary.
This patch moves the decision on whether to set ZONE_CONGESTED and the
wait_iff_congested call into shrink_page_list. This keeps all the
decisions on whether to stall or not in the one place.
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 5f80d01..4898daf 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -695,7 +695,9 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
struct zone *zone,
struct scan_control *sc,
enum ttu_flags ttu_flags,
+ unsigned long *ret_nr_dirty,
unsigned long *ret_nr_unqueued_dirty,
+ unsigned long *ret_nr_congested,
unsigned long *ret_nr_writeback,
unsigned long *ret_nr_immediate,
bool force_reclaim)
@@ -1017,20 +1019,13 @@ keep:
VM_BUG_ON(PageLRU(page) || PageUnevictable(page));
}
- /*
- * Tag a zone as congested if all the dirty pages encountered were
- * backed by a congested BDI. In this case, reclaimers should just
- * back off and wait for congestion to clear because further reclaim
- * will encounter the same problem
- */
- if (nr_dirty && nr_dirty == nr_congested && global_reclaim(sc))
- zone_set_flag(zone, ZONE_CONGESTED);
-
free_hot_cold_page_list(&free_pages, 1);
list_splice(&ret_pages, page_list);
count_vm_events(PGACTIVATE, pgactivate);
mem_cgroup_uncharge_end();
+ *ret_nr_dirty += nr_dirty;
+ *ret_nr_congested += nr_congested;
*ret_nr_unqueued_dirty += nr_unqueued_dirty;
*ret_nr_writeback += nr_writeback;
*ret_nr_immediate += nr_immediate;
@@ -1045,7 +1040,7 @@ unsigned long reclaim_clean_pages_from_list(struct zone *zone,
.priority = DEF_PRIORITY,
.may_unmap = 1,
};
- unsigned long ret, dummy1, dummy2, dummy3;
+ unsigned long ret, dummy1, dummy2, dummy3, dummy4, dummy5;
struct page *page, *next;
LIST_HEAD(clean_pages);
@@ -1057,8 +1052,8 @@ unsigned long reclaim_clean_pages_from_list(struct zone *zone,
}
ret = shrink_page_list(&clean_pages, zone, &sc,
- TTU_UNMAP|TTU_IGNORE_ACCESS,
- &dummy1, &dummy2, &dummy3, true);
+ TTU_UNMAP|TTU_IGNORE_ACCESS,
+ &dummy1, &dummy2, &dummy3, &dummy4, &dummy5, true);
list_splice(&clean_pages, page_list);
__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_FILE, -ret);
return ret;
@@ -1352,6 +1347,8 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
unsigned long nr_scanned;
unsigned long nr_reclaimed = 0;
unsigned long nr_taken;
+ unsigned long nr_dirty = 0;
+ unsigned long nr_congested = 0;
unsigned long nr_unqueued_dirty = 0;
unsigned long nr_writeback = 0;
unsigned long nr_immediate = 0;
@@ -1396,8 +1393,9 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
return 0;
nr_reclaimed = shrink_page_list(&page_list, zone, sc, TTU_UNMAP,
- &nr_unqueued_dirty, &nr_writeback, &nr_immediate,
- false);
+ &nr_dirty, &nr_unqueued_dirty, &nr_congested,
+ &nr_writeback, &nr_immediate,
+ false);
spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
@@ -1431,7 +1429,7 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
* same way balance_dirty_pages() manages.
*
* This scales the number of dirty pages that must be under writeback
- * before throttling depending on priority. It is a simple backoff
+ * before a zone gets flagged ZONE_WRITEBACK. It is a simple backoff
* function that has the most effect in the range DEF_PRIORITY to
* DEF_PRIORITY-2 which is the priority reclaim is considered to be
* in trouble and reclaim is considered to be in trouble.
@@ -1442,12 +1440,14 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
* ...
* DEF_PRIORITY-6 For SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX isolated pages, throttle if any
* isolated page is PageWriteback
+ *
+ * Once a zone is flagged ZONE_WRITEBACK, kswapd will count the number
+ * of pages under pages flagged for immediate reclaim and stall if any
+ * are encountered in the nr_immediate check below.
*/
if (nr_writeback && nr_writeback >=
- (nr_taken >> (DEF_PRIORITY - sc->priority))) {
+ (nr_taken >> (DEF_PRIORITY - sc->priority)))
zone_set_flag(zone, ZONE_WRITEBACK);
- wait_iff_congested(zone, BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
- }
/*
* memcg will stall in page writeback so only consider forcibly
@@ -1455,6 +1455,13 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
*/
if (global_reclaim(sc)) {
/*
+ * Tag a zone as congested if all the dirty pages scanned were
+ * backed by a congested BDI and wait_iff_congested will stall.
+ */
+ if (nr_dirty && nr_dirty == nr_congested)
+ zone_set_flag(zone, ZONE_CONGESTED);
+
+ /*
* If dirty pages are scanned that are not queued for IO, it
* implies that flushers are not keeping up. In this case, flag
* the zone ZONE_TAIL_LRU_DIRTY and kswapd will start writing
@@ -1474,6 +1481,14 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
}
+ /*
+ * Stall direct reclaim for IO completions if underlying BDIs or zone
+ * is congested. Allow kswapd to continue until it starts encountering
+ * unqueued dirty pages or cycling through the LRU too quickly.
+ */
+ if (!sc->hibernation_mode && !current_is_kswapd())
+ wait_iff_congested(zone, BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
+
trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive(zone->zone_pgdat->node_id,
zone_idx(zone),
nr_scanned, nr_reclaimed,
@@ -2374,17 +2389,6 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
WB_REASON_TRY_TO_FREE_PAGES);
sc->may_writepage = 1;
}
-
- /* Take a nap, wait for some writeback to complete */
- if (!sc->hibernation_mode && sc->nr_scanned &&
- sc->priority < DEF_PRIORITY - 2) {
- struct zone *preferred_zone;
-
- first_zones_zonelist(zonelist, gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask),
- &cpuset_current_mems_allowed,
- &preferred_zone);
- wait_iff_congested(preferred_zone, BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
- }
} while (--sc->priority >= 0);
out:
--
1.8.1.4
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 6/8] mm: vmscan: Treat pages marked for immediate reclaim as zone congestion
2013-05-29 23:17 [PATCH 0/8] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd followup V3 Mel Gorman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2013-05-29 23:17 ` [PATCH 5/8] mm: vmscan: Move direct reclaim wait_iff_congested into shrink_list Mel Gorman
@ 2013-05-29 23:17 ` Mel Gorman
2013-05-29 23:17 ` [PATCH 7/8] mm: vmscan: Take page buffers dirty and locked state into account Mel Gorman
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mel Gorman @ 2013-05-29 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: Jiri Slaby, Valdis Kletnieks, Rik van Riel, Zlatko Calusic,
Johannes Weiner, dormando, Michal Hocko, Jan Kara, Dave Chinner,
Kamezawa Hiroyuki, Linux-FSDevel, Linux-MM, LKML, Mel Gorman
Currently a zone will only be marked congested if the underlying BDI
is congested but if dirty pages are spread across zones it is possible
that an individual zone is full of dirty pages without being congested.
The impact is that zone gets scanned very quickly potentially reclaiming
really clean pages. This patch treats pages marked for immediate reclaim
as congested for the purposes of marking a zone ZONE_CONGESTED and
stalling in wait_iff_congested.
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 4898daf..bf47784 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -761,9 +761,15 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
if (dirty && !writeback)
nr_unqueued_dirty++;
- /* Treat this page as congested if underlying BDI is */
+ /*
+ * Treat this page as congested if the underlying BDI is or if
+ * pages are cycling through the LRU so quickly that the
+ * pages marked for immediate reclaim are making it to the
+ * end of the LRU a second time.
+ */
mapping = page_mapping(page);
- if (mapping && bdi_write_congested(mapping->backing_dev_info))
+ if ((mapping && bdi_write_congested(mapping->backing_dev_info)) ||
+ (writeback && PageReclaim(page)))
nr_congested++;
/*
--
1.8.1.4
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 7/8] mm: vmscan: Take page buffers dirty and locked state into account
2013-05-29 23:17 [PATCH 0/8] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd followup V3 Mel Gorman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2013-05-29 23:17 ` [PATCH 6/8] mm: vmscan: Treat pages marked for immediate reclaim as zone congestion Mel Gorman
@ 2013-05-29 23:17 ` Mel Gorman
2013-05-29 23:17 ` [PATCH 8/8] fs: nfs: Inform the VM about pages being committed or unstable Mel Gorman
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mel Gorman @ 2013-05-29 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: Jiri Slaby, Valdis Kletnieks, Rik van Riel, Zlatko Calusic,
Johannes Weiner, dormando, Michal Hocko, Jan Kara, Dave Chinner,
Kamezawa Hiroyuki, Linux-FSDevel, Linux-MM, LKML, Mel Gorman
Page reclaim keeps track of dirty and under writeback pages and uses it to
determine if wait_iff_congested() should stall or if kswapd should begin
writing back pages. This fails to account for buffer pages that can be under
writeback but not PageWriteback which is the case for filesystems like ext3
ordered mode. Furthermore, PageDirty buffer pages can have all the buffers
clean and writepage does no IO so it should not be accounted as congested.
This patch adds an address_space operation that filesystems may
optionally use to check if a page is really dirty or really under
writeback. An implementation is provided for for buffer_heads is added
and used for block operations and ext3 in ordered mode. By default the
page flags are obeyed.
Credit goes to Jan Kara for identifying that the page flags alone are
not sufficient for ext3 and sanity checking a number of ideas on how
the problem could be addressed.
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
---
fs/block_dev.c | 1 +
fs/buffer.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
fs/ext3/inode.c | 1 +
include/linux/buffer_head.h | 3 +++
include/linux/fs.h | 1 +
mm/vmscan.c | 10 ++++++++++
6 files changed, 50 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
index 2091db8..9c8ebe4 100644
--- a/fs/block_dev.c
+++ b/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -1583,6 +1583,7 @@ static const struct address_space_operations def_blk_aops = {
.writepages = generic_writepages,
.releasepage = blkdev_releasepage,
.direct_IO = blkdev_direct_IO,
+ .is_dirty_writeback = buffer_check_dirty_writeback,
};
const struct file_operations def_blk_fops = {
diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
index 1aa0836..4247aa9 100644
--- a/fs/buffer.c
+++ b/fs/buffer.c
@@ -91,6 +91,40 @@ void unlock_buffer(struct buffer_head *bh)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(unlock_buffer);
/*
+ * Returns if the page has dirty or writeback buffers. If all the buffers
+ * are unlocked and clean then the PageDirty information is stale. If
+ * any of the pages are locked, it is assumed they are locked for IO.
+ */
+void buffer_check_dirty_writeback(struct page *page,
+ bool *dirty, bool *writeback)
+{
+ struct buffer_head *head, *bh;
+ *dirty = false;
+ *writeback = false;
+
+ BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page));
+
+ if (!page_has_buffers(page))
+ return;
+
+ if (PageWriteback(page))
+ *writeback = true;
+
+ head = page_buffers(page);
+ bh = head;
+ do {
+ if (buffer_locked(bh))
+ *writeback = true;
+
+ if (buffer_dirty(bh))
+ *dirty = true;
+
+ bh = bh->b_this_page;
+ } while (bh != head);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(buffer_check_dirty_writeback);
+
+/*
* Block until a buffer comes unlocked. This doesn't stop it
* from becoming locked again - you have to lock it yourself
* if you want to preserve its state.
diff --git a/fs/ext3/inode.c b/fs/ext3/inode.c
index 23c7128..8e590bd 100644
--- a/fs/ext3/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext3/inode.c
@@ -1984,6 +1984,7 @@ static const struct address_space_operations ext3_ordered_aops = {
.direct_IO = ext3_direct_IO,
.migratepage = buffer_migrate_page,
.is_partially_uptodate = block_is_partially_uptodate,
+ .is_dirty_writeback = buffer_check_dirty_writeback,
.error_remove_page = generic_error_remove_page,
};
diff --git a/include/linux/buffer_head.h b/include/linux/buffer_head.h
index 6d9f5a2..d458880 100644
--- a/include/linux/buffer_head.h
+++ b/include/linux/buffer_head.h
@@ -139,6 +139,9 @@ BUFFER_FNS(Prio, prio)
})
#define page_has_buffers(page) PagePrivate(page)
+void buffer_check_dirty_writeback(struct page *page,
+ bool *dirty, bool *writeback);
+
/*
* Declarations
*/
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 0a9a6766..96f857f 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -380,6 +380,7 @@ struct address_space_operations {
int (*launder_page) (struct page *);
int (*is_partially_uptodate) (struct page *, read_descriptor_t *,
unsigned long);
+ void (*is_dirty_writeback) (struct page *, bool *, bool *);
int (*error_remove_page)(struct address_space *, struct page *);
/* swapfile support */
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index bf47784..c857943 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -673,6 +673,8 @@ static enum page_references page_check_references(struct page *page,
static void page_check_dirty_writeback(struct page *page,
bool *dirty, bool *writeback)
{
+ struct address_space *mapping;
+
/*
* Anonymous pages are not handled by flushers and must be written
* from reclaim context. Do not stall reclaim based on them
@@ -686,6 +688,14 @@ static void page_check_dirty_writeback(struct page *page,
/* By default assume that the page flags are accurate */
*dirty = PageDirty(page);
*writeback = PageWriteback(page);
+
+ /* Verify dirty/writeback state if the filesystem supports it */
+ if (!page_has_private(page))
+ return;
+
+ mapping = page_mapping(page);
+ if (mapping && mapping->a_ops->is_dirty_writeback)
+ mapping->a_ops->is_dirty_writeback(page, dirty, writeback);
}
/*
--
1.8.1.4
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 8/8] fs: nfs: Inform the VM about pages being committed or unstable
2013-05-29 23:17 [PATCH 0/8] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd followup V3 Mel Gorman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2013-05-29 23:17 ` [PATCH 7/8] mm: vmscan: Take page buffers dirty and locked state into account Mel Gorman
@ 2013-05-29 23:17 ` Mel Gorman
2013-05-30 10:10 ` [PATCH 0/8] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd followup V3 Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 14:21 ` Hush Bensen
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mel Gorman @ 2013-05-29 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: Jiri Slaby, Valdis Kletnieks, Rik van Riel, Zlatko Calusic,
Johannes Weiner, dormando, Michal Hocko, Jan Kara, Dave Chinner,
Kamezawa Hiroyuki, Linux-FSDevel, Linux-MM, LKML, Mel Gorman
VM page reclaim uses dirty and writeback page states to determine if
flushers are cleaning pages too slowly and that page reclaim should
stall waiting on flushers to catch up. Page state in NFS is a bit
more complex and a clean page can be unreclaimable due to being
unstable which is effectively "dirty" from the perspective of the
VM from reclaim context. Similarly, if the inode is currently being
committed then it's similar to being under writeback.
This patch adds a is_dirty_writeback() handled for NFS that checks
if a pages backing inode is being committed and should be accounted as
writeback and if a page has private state indicating that it is
effectively dirty.
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
---
fs/nfs/file.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/file.c b/fs/nfs/file.c
index a87a44f..a4250a4 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/file.c
@@ -493,6 +493,35 @@ static int nfs_release_page(struct page *page, gfp_t gfp)
return nfs_fscache_release_page(page, gfp);
}
+static void nfs_check_dirty_writeback(struct page *page,
+ bool *dirty, bool *writeback)
+{
+ struct nfs_inode *nfsi;
+ struct address_space *mapping = page_file_mapping(page);
+
+ if (!mapping || PageSwapCache(page))
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * Check if an unstable page is currently being committed and
+ * if so, have the VM treat it as if the page is under writeback
+ * so it will not block due to pages that will shortly be freeable.
+ */
+ nfsi = NFS_I(mapping->host);
+ if (test_bit(NFS_INO_COMMIT, &nfsi->flags)) {
+ *writeback = true;
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * If PagePrivate() is set, then the page is not freeable and as the
+ * inode is not being committed, it's not going to be cleaned in the
+ * near future so treat it as dirty
+ */
+ if (PagePrivate(page))
+ *dirty = true;
+}
+
/*
* Attempt to clear the private state associated with a page when an error
* occurs that requires the cached contents of an inode to be written back or
@@ -540,6 +569,7 @@ const struct address_space_operations nfs_file_aops = {
.direct_IO = nfs_direct_IO,
.migratepage = nfs_migrate_page,
.launder_page = nfs_launder_page,
+ .is_dirty_writeback = nfs_check_dirty_writeback,
.error_remove_page = generic_error_remove_page,
#ifdef CONFIG_NFS_SWAP
.swap_activate = nfs_swap_activate,
--
1.8.1.4
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/8] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd followup V3
2013-05-29 23:17 [PATCH 0/8] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd followup V3 Mel Gorman
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2013-05-29 23:17 ` [PATCH 8/8] fs: nfs: Inform the VM about pages being committed or unstable Mel Gorman
@ 2013-05-30 10:10 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 14:21 ` Hush Bensen
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mel Gorman @ 2013-05-30 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: Jiri Slaby, Valdis Kletnieks, Rik van Riel, Zlatko Calusic,
Johannes Weiner, dormando, Michal Hocko, Jan Kara, Dave Chinner,
Kamezawa Hiroyuki, Linux-FSDevel, Linux-MM, LKML
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:17:29AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> tldr; Overall the system is getting less kicked in the face. Scan rates
> between zones is often more balanced than it used to be. There are
> now fewer writes from reclaim context and a reduction in IO wait
> times.
>
> This series replaces all of the previous follow-up series. It was clear
> that more of the stall logic needed to be in the same place so it is
> comprehensible and easier to predict.
>
There was some unfortunate crossover in timing as I see mmotm has pulled
in the previous follow up series. It would probably be easiest to replace
these patches
mm-vmscan-stall-page-reclaim-and-writeback-pages-based-on-dirty-writepage-pages-encountered.patch
mm-vmscan-stall-page-reclaim-after-a-list-of-pages-have-been-processed.patch
mm-vmscan-take-page-buffers-dirty-and-locked-state-into-account.patch
mm-vmscan-stall-page-reclaim-and-writeback-pages-based-on-dirty-writepage-pages-encountered.patch
with patches 2-8 of this series. The fixup patch
mm-vmscan-block-kswapd-if-it-is-encountering-pages-under-writeback-fix-2.patch
is still the same
Sorry for the inconvenience.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/8] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd followup V3
2013-05-29 23:17 [PATCH 0/8] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd followup V3 Mel Gorman
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2013-05-30 10:10 ` [PATCH 0/8] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd followup V3 Mel Gorman
@ 2013-07-15 14:21 ` Hush Bensen
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Hush Bensen @ 2013-07-15 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mel Gorman, Andrew Morton
Cc: Jiri Slaby, Valdis Kletnieks, Rik van Riel, Zlatko Calusic,
Johannes Weiner, dormando, Michal Hocko, Jan Kara, Dave Chinner,
Kamezawa Hiroyuki, Linux-FSDevel, Linux-MM, LKML
于 2013/5/30 7:17, Mel Gorman 写道:
> tldr; Overall the system is getting less kicked in the face. Scan rates
> between zones is often more balanced than it used to be. There are
> now fewer writes from reclaim context and a reduction in IO wait
> times.
>
> This series replaces all of the previous follow-up series. It was clear
> that more of the stall logic needed to be in the same place so it is
> comprehensible and easier to predict.
>
> Changelog since V2
> o Consolidate stall decisions into one place
> o Add is_dirty_writeback for NFS
> o Move accounting around
>
> Further testing of the "Reduce system disruption due to kswapd" discovered
> a few problems. First and foremost, it's possible for pages under writeback
> to be freed which will lead to badness. Second, as pages were not being
> swapped the file LRU was being scanned faster and clean file pages were
> being reclaimed. In some cases this results in increased read IO to re-read
> data from disk. Third, more pages were being written from kswapd context
> which can adversly affect IO performance. Lastly, it was observed that
> PageDirty pages are not necessarily dirty on all filesystems (buffers can be
> clean while PageDirty is set and ->writepage generates no IO) and not all
> filesystems set PageWriteback when the page is being written (e.g. ext3).
> This disconnect confuses the reclaim stalling logic. This follow-up series
> is aimed at these problems.
>
> The tests were based on three kernels
>
> vanilla: kernel 3.9 as that is what the current mmotm uses as a baseline
> mmotm-20130522 is mmotm as of 22nd May with "Reduce system disruption due to
> kswapd" applied on top as per what should be in Andrew's tree
> right now
> lessdisrupt-v7r10 is this follow-up series on top of the mmotm kernel
>
> The first test used memcached+memcachetest while some background IO
> was in progress as implemented by the parallel IO tests implement in
> MM Tests. memcachetest benchmarks how many operations/second memcached
> can service. It starts with no background IO on a freshly created ext4
> filesystem and then re-runs the test with larger amounts of IO in the
> background to roughly simulate a large copy in progress. The expectation
> is that the IO should have little or no impact on memcachetest which is
> running entirely in memory.
>
> parallelio
> 3.9.0 3.9.0 3.9.0
> vanilla mm1-mmotm-20130522 mm1-lessdisrupt-v7r10
> Ops memcachetest-0M 23117.00 ( 0.00%) 22780.00 ( -1.46%) 22763.00 ( -1.53%)
> Ops memcachetest-715M 23774.00 ( 0.00%) 23299.00 ( -2.00%) 22934.00 ( -3.53%)
> Ops memcachetest-2385M 4208.00 ( 0.00%) 24154.00 (474.00%) 23765.00 (464.76%)
> Ops memcachetest-4055M 4104.00 ( 0.00%) 25130.00 (512.33%) 24614.00 (499.76%)
> Ops io-duration-0M 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
> Ops io-duration-715M 12.00 ( 0.00%) 7.00 ( 41.67%) 6.00 ( 50.00%)
> Ops io-duration-2385M 116.00 ( 0.00%) 21.00 ( 81.90%) 21.00 ( 81.90%)
> Ops io-duration-4055M 160.00 ( 0.00%) 36.00 ( 77.50%) 35.00 ( 78.12%)
> Ops swaptotal-0M 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
> Ops swaptotal-715M 140138.00 ( 0.00%) 18.00 ( 99.99%) 18.00 ( 99.99%)
> Ops swaptotal-2385M 385682.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
> Ops swaptotal-4055M 418029.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
> Ops swapin-0M 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
> Ops swapin-715M 144.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
> Ops swapin-2385M 134227.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
> Ops swapin-4055M 125618.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
> Ops minorfaults-0M 1536429.00 ( 0.00%) 1531632.00 ( 0.31%) 1533541.00 ( 0.19%)
> Ops minorfaults-715M 1786996.00 ( 0.00%) 1612148.00 ( 9.78%) 1608832.00 ( 9.97%)
> Ops minorfaults-2385M 1757952.00 ( 0.00%) 1614874.00 ( 8.14%) 1613541.00 ( 8.21%)
> Ops minorfaults-4055M 1774460.00 ( 0.00%) 1633400.00 ( 7.95%) 1630881.00 ( 8.09%)
> Ops majorfaults-0M 1.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
> Ops majorfaults-715M 184.00 ( 0.00%) 167.00 ( 9.24%) 166.00 ( 9.78%)
> Ops majorfaults-2385M 24444.00 ( 0.00%) 155.00 ( 99.37%) 93.00 ( 99.62%)
> Ops majorfaults-4055M 21357.00 ( 0.00%) 147.00 ( 99.31%) 134.00 ( 99.37%)
>
> memcachetest is the transactions/second reported by memcachetest. In
> the vanilla kernel note that performance drops from around
> 23K/sec to just over 4K/second when there is 2385M of IO going
> on in the background. With current mmotm, there is no collapse
> in performance and with this follow-up series there is little
> change.
>
> swaptotal is the total amount of swap traffic. With mmotm and the follow-up
> series, the total amount of swapping is much reduced.
>
>
> 3.9.0 3.9.0 3.9.0
> vanillamm1-mmotm-20130522mm1-lessdisrupt-v7r10
> Minor Faults 11160152 10706748 10622316
> Major Faults 46305 755 678
> Swap Ins 260249 0 0
> Swap Outs 683860 18 18
> Direct pages scanned 0 678 2520
> Kswapd pages scanned 6046108 8814900 1639279
> Kswapd pages reclaimed 1081954 1172267 1094635
> Direct pages reclaimed 0 566 2304
> Kswapd efficiency 17% 13% 66%
> Kswapd velocity 5217.560 7618.953 1414.879
> Direct efficiency 100% 83% 91%
> Direct velocity 0.000 0.586 2.175
> Percentage direct scans 0% 0% 0%
> Zone normal velocity 5105.086 6824.681 671.158
> Zone dma32 velocity 112.473 794.858 745.896
> Zone dma velocity 0.000 0.000 0.000
> Page writes by reclaim 1929612.000 6861768.000 32821.000
> Page writes file 1245752 6861750 32803
> Page writes anon 683860 18 18
> Page reclaim immediate 7484 40 239
> Sector Reads 1130320 93996 86900
> Sector Writes 13508052 10823500 11804436
> Page rescued immediate 0 0 0
> Slabs scanned 33536 27136 18560
> Direct inode steals 0 0 0
> Kswapd inode steals 8641 1035 0
> Kswapd skipped wait 0 0 0
> THP fault alloc 8 37 33
> THP collapse alloc 508 552 515
> THP splits 24 1 1
> THP fault fallback 0 0 0
> THP collapse fail 0 0 0
Which mmtest config you used for this one?
>
> There are a number of observations to make here
>
> 1. Swap outs are almost eliminated. Swap ins are 0 indicating that the
> pages swapped were really unused anonymous pages. Related to that,
> major faults are much reduced.
>
> 2. kswapd efficiency was impacted by the initial series but with these
> follow-up patches, the efficiency is now at 66% indicating that far
> fewer pages were skipped during scanning due to dirty or writeback
> pages.
>
> 3. kswapd velocity is reduced indicating that fewer pages are being scanned
> with the follow-up series as kswapd now stalls when the tail of the
> LRU queue is full of unqueued dirty pages. The stall gives flushers a
> chance to catch-up so kswapd can reclaim clean pages when it wakes
>
> 4. In light of Zlatko's recent reports about zone scanning imbalances,
> mmtests now reports scanning velocity on a per-zone basis. With mainline,
> you can see that the scanning activity is dominated by the Normal
> zone with over 45 times more scanning in Normal than the DMA32 zone.
> With the series currently in mmotm, the ratio is slightly better but it
> is still the case that the bulk of scanning is in the highest zone. With
> this follow-up series, the ratio of scanning between the Normal and
> DMA32 zone is roughly equal.
>
> 5. As Dave Chinner observed, the current patches in mmotm increased the
> number of pages written from kswapd context which is expected to adversly
> impact IO performance. With the follow-up patches, far fewer pages are
> written from kswapd context than the mainline kernel
>
> 6. With the series in mmotm, fewer inodes were reclaimed by kswapd. With
> the follow-up series, there is less slab shrinking activity and no inodes
> were reclaimed.
>
> 7. Note that "Sectors Read" is drastically reduced implying that the source
> data being used for the IO is not being aggressively discarded due to
> page reclaim skipping over dirty pages and reclaiming clean pages. Note
> that the reducion in reads could also be due to inode data not being
> re-read from disk after a slab shrink.
>
> 3.9.0 3.9.0 3.9.0
> vanillamm1-mmotm-20130522mm1-lessdisrupt-v7r10
> Mean sda-avgqz 166.99 32.09 33.44
> Mean sda-await 853.64 192.76 185.43
> Mean sda-r_await 6.31 9.24 5.97
> Mean sda-w_await 2992.81 202.65 192.43
> Max sda-avgqz 1409.91 718.75 698.98
> Max sda-await 6665.74 3538.00 3124.23
> Max sda-r_await 58.96 111.95 58.00
> Max sda-w_await 28458.94 3977.29 3148.61
>
> In light of the changes in writes from reclaim context, the number of
> reads and Dave Chinner's concerns about IO performance I took a closer
> look at the IO stats for the test disk. Few observations
>
> 1. The average queue size is reduced by the initial series and roughly
> the same with this follow up.
>
> 2. Average wait times for writes are reduced and as the IO
> is completing faster it at least implies that the gain is because
> flushers are writing the files efficiently instead of page reclaim
> getting in the way.
>
> 3. The reduction in maximum write latency is staggering. 28 seconds down
> to 3 seconds.
>
>
> Jan Kara asked how NFS is affected by all of this. Unstable pages can
> be taken into account as one of the patches in the series shows but it
> is still the case that filesystems with unusual handling of dirty or
> writeback could still be treated better.
>
> Tests like postmark, fsmark and largedd showed up nothing useful. On my test
> setup, pages are simply not being written back from reclaim context with or
> without the patches and there are no changes in performance. My test setup
> probably is just not strong enough network-wise to be really interesting.
>
> I ran a longer-lived memcached test with IO going to NFS instead of a local disk
>
> parallelio
> 3.9.0 3.9.0 3.9.0
> vanilla mm1-mmotm-20130522 mm1-lessdisrupt-v7r10
> Ops memcachetest-0M 23323.00 ( 0.00%) 23241.00 ( -0.35%) 23321.00 ( -0.01%)
> Ops memcachetest-715M 25526.00 ( 0.00%) 24763.00 ( -2.99%) 23242.00 ( -8.95%)
> Ops memcachetest-2385M 8814.00 ( 0.00%) 26924.00 (205.47%) 23521.00 (166.86%)
> Ops memcachetest-4055M 5835.00 ( 0.00%) 26827.00 (359.76%) 25560.00 (338.05%)
> Ops io-duration-0M 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
> Ops io-duration-715M 65.00 ( 0.00%) 71.00 ( -9.23%) 11.00 ( 83.08%)
> Ops io-duration-2385M 129.00 ( 0.00%) 94.00 ( 27.13%) 53.00 ( 58.91%)
> Ops io-duration-4055M 301.00 ( 0.00%) 100.00 ( 66.78%) 108.00 ( 64.12%)
> Ops swaptotal-0M 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
> Ops swaptotal-715M 14394.00 ( 0.00%) 949.00 ( 93.41%) 63.00 ( 99.56%)
> Ops swaptotal-2385M 401483.00 ( 0.00%) 24437.00 ( 93.91%) 30118.00 ( 92.50%)
> Ops swaptotal-4055M 554123.00 ( 0.00%) 35688.00 ( 93.56%) 63082.00 ( 88.62%)
> Ops swapin-0M 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
> Ops swapin-715M 4522.00 ( 0.00%) 560.00 ( 87.62%) 63.00 ( 98.61%)
> Ops swapin-2385M 169861.00 ( 0.00%) 5026.00 ( 97.04%) 13917.00 ( 91.81%)
> Ops swapin-4055M 192374.00 ( 0.00%) 10056.00 ( 94.77%) 25729.00 ( 86.63%)
> Ops minorfaults-0M 1445969.00 ( 0.00%) 1520878.00 ( -5.18%) 1454024.00 ( -0.56%)
> Ops minorfaults-715M 1557288.00 ( 0.00%) 1528482.00 ( 1.85%) 1535776.00 ( 1.38%)
> Ops minorfaults-2385M 1692896.00 ( 0.00%) 1570523.00 ( 7.23%) 1559622.00 ( 7.87%)
> Ops minorfaults-4055M 1654985.00 ( 0.00%) 1581456.00 ( 4.44%) 1596713.00 ( 3.52%)
> Ops majorfaults-0M 0.00 ( 0.00%) 1.00 (-99.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
> Ops majorfaults-715M 763.00 ( 0.00%) 265.00 ( 65.27%) 75.00 ( 90.17%)
> Ops majorfaults-2385M 23861.00 ( 0.00%) 894.00 ( 96.25%) 2189.00 ( 90.83%)
> Ops majorfaults-4055M 27210.00 ( 0.00%) 1569.00 ( 94.23%) 4088.00 ( 84.98%)
>
> 1. Performance does not collapse due to IO which is good. IO is also completing
> faster. Note with mmotm, IO completes in a third of the time and faster again
> with this series applied
>
> 2. Swapping is reduced, although not eliminated. The figures for the follow-up
> look bad but it does vary a bit as the stalling is not perfect for nfs
> or filesystems like ext3 with unusual handling of dirty and writeback
> pages
>
> 3. There are swapins, particularly with larger amounts of IO indicating
> that active pages are being reclaimed. However, the number of much
> reduced.
>
> 3.9.0 3.9.0 3.9.0
> vanillamm1-mmotm-20130522mm1-lessdisrupt-v7r10
> Minor Faults 36339175 35025445 35219699
> Major Faults 310964 27108 51887
> Swap Ins 2176399 173069 333316
> Swap Outs 3344050 357228 504824
> Direct pages scanned 8972 77283 43242
> Kswapd pages scanned 20899983 8939566 14772851
> Kswapd pages reclaimed 6193156 5172605 5231026
> Direct pages reclaimed 8450 73802 39514
> Kswapd efficiency 29% 57% 35%
> Kswapd velocity 3929.743 1847.499 3058.840
> Direct efficiency 94% 95% 91%
> Direct velocity 1.687 15.972 8.954
> Percentage direct scans 0% 0% 0%
> Zone normal velocity 3721.907 939.103 2185.142
> Zone dma32 velocity 209.522 924.368 882.651
> Zone dma velocity 0.000 0.000 0.000
> Page writes by reclaim 4082185.000 526319.000 537114.000
> Page writes file 738135 169091 32290
> Page writes anon 3344050 357228 504824
> Page reclaim immediate 9524 170 5595843
> Sector Reads 8909900 861192 1483680
> Sector Writes 13428980 1488744 2076800
> Page rescued immediate 0 0 0
> Slabs scanned 38016 31744 28672
> Direct inode steals 0 0 0
> Kswapd inode steals 424 0 0
> Kswapd skipped wait 0 0 0
> THP fault alloc 14 15 119
> THP collapse alloc 1767 1569 1618
> THP splits 30 29 25
> THP fault fallback 0 0 0
> THP collapse fail 8 5 0
> Compaction stalls 17 41 100
> Compaction success 7 31 95
> Compaction failures 10 10 5
> Page migrate success 7083 22157 62217
> Page migrate failure 0 0 0
> Compaction pages isolated 14847 48758 135830
> Compaction migrate scanned 18328 48398 138929
> Compaction free scanned 2000255 355827 1720269
> Compaction cost 7 24 68
>
> I guess the main takeaway again is the much reduced page writes
> from reclaim context and reduced reads.
>
> 3.9.0 3.9.0 3.9.0
> vanillamm1-mmotm-20130522mm1-lessdisrupt-v7r10
> Mean sda-avgqz 23.58 0.35 0.44
> Mean sda-await 133.47 15.72 15.46
> Mean sda-r_await 4.72 4.69 3.95
> Mean sda-w_await 507.69 28.40 33.68
> Max sda-avgqz 680.60 12.25 23.14
> Max sda-await 3958.89 221.83 286.22
> Max sda-r_await 63.86 61.23 67.29
> Max sda-w_await 11710.38 883.57 1767.28
>
> And as before, write wait times are much reduced.
>
> fs/block_dev.c | 1 +
> fs/buffer.c | 34 +++++++++
> fs/ext3/inode.c | 1 +
> fs/nfs/file.c | 30 ++++++++
> include/linux/buffer_head.h | 3 +
> include/linux/fs.h | 1 +
> mm/vmscan.c | 164 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 7 files changed, 189 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-07-15 14:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-05-29 23:17 [PATCH 0/8] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd followup V3 Mel Gorman
2013-05-29 23:17 ` [PATCH 1/8] mm: vmscan: Block kswapd if it is encountering pages under writeback -fix Mel Gorman
2013-05-29 23:17 ` [PATCH 2/8] mm: vmscan: Stall page reclaim and writeback pages based on dirty/writepage pages encountered Mel Gorman
2013-05-29 23:17 ` [PATCH 3/8] mm: vmscan: Stall page reclaim after a list of pages have been processed Mel Gorman
2013-05-29 23:17 ` [PATCH 4/8] mm: vmscan: Set zone flags before blocking Mel Gorman
2013-05-29 23:17 ` [PATCH 5/8] mm: vmscan: Move direct reclaim wait_iff_congested into shrink_list Mel Gorman
2013-05-29 23:17 ` [PATCH 6/8] mm: vmscan: Treat pages marked for immediate reclaim as zone congestion Mel Gorman
2013-05-29 23:17 ` [PATCH 7/8] mm: vmscan: Take page buffers dirty and locked state into account Mel Gorman
2013-05-29 23:17 ` [PATCH 8/8] fs: nfs: Inform the VM about pages being committed or unstable Mel Gorman
2013-05-30 10:10 ` [PATCH 0/8] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd followup V3 Mel Gorman
2013-07-15 14:21 ` Hush Bensen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).