From: Glauber Costa <glommer-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
Cc: <linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>,
Dave Chinner <david-FqsqvQoI3Ljby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org>,
<linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>,
<cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
<kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>,
hughd-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
Greg Thelen <gthelen-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Glauber Costa <glommer-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: [PATCH v9 28/35] list_lru: per-memcg walks
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 14:36:14 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1369910181-20026-29-git-send-email-glommer@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1369910181-20026-1-git-send-email-glommer-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
This patch extend the list_lru interfaces to allow for a memcg
parameter. Because most of its users won't need it, instead of
modifying the function signatures we create a new set of _memcg()
functions and write the old API ontop of that.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
c: Hugh Dickins <hughd-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
---
include/linux/list_lru.h | 26 ++++++++++++---
include/linux/memcontrol.h | 2 ++
lib/list_lru.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
3 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/list_lru.h b/include/linux/list_lru.h
index 3b8c301..dcb67dc 100644
--- a/include/linux/list_lru.h
+++ b/include/linux/list_lru.h
@@ -100,7 +100,15 @@ static inline int list_lru_init_memcg(struct list_lru *lru)
int list_lru_add(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item);
int list_lru_del(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item);
-unsigned long list_lru_count_node(struct list_lru *lru, int nid);
+unsigned long list_lru_count_node_memcg(struct list_lru *lru, int nid,
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
+
+static inline unsigned long
+list_lru_count_node(struct list_lru *lru, int nid)
+{
+ return list_lru_count_node_memcg(lru, nid, NULL);
+}
+
static inline unsigned long list_lru_count(struct list_lru *lru)
{
long count = 0;
@@ -118,9 +126,19 @@ typedef enum lru_status
typedef void (*list_lru_dispose_cb)(struct list_head *dispose_list);
-unsigned long list_lru_walk_node(struct list_lru *lru, int nid,
- list_lru_walk_cb isolate, void *cb_arg,
- unsigned long *nr_to_walk);
+unsigned long
+list_lru_walk_node_memcg(struct list_lru *lru, int nid,
+ list_lru_walk_cb isolate, void *cb_arg,
+ unsigned long *nr_to_walk, struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
+
+static inline unsigned long
+list_lru_walk_node(struct list_lru *lru, int nid,
+ list_lru_walk_cb isolate, void *cb_arg,
+ unsigned long *nr_to_walk)
+{
+ return list_lru_walk_node_memcg(lru, nid, isolate, cb_arg,
+ nr_to_walk, NULL);
+}
static inline unsigned long
list_lru_walk(struct list_lru *lru, list_lru_walk_cb isolate,
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index 50f199f..3eeece8 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -593,6 +593,8 @@ static inline bool memcg_kmem_is_active(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
#define for_each_memcg_cache_index(_idx) \
for (; NULL; )
+#define memcg_limited_groups_array_size 0
+
static inline bool memcg_kmem_enabled(void)
{
return false;
diff --git a/lib/list_lru.c b/lib/list_lru.c
index 128af5e..316c95a 100644
--- a/lib/list_lru.c
+++ b/lib/list_lru.c
@@ -80,6 +80,23 @@ memcg_kmem_lru_of_page(struct list_lru *lru, struct page *page)
return lru_node_of_index(lru, memcg_id, nid);
}
+/*
+ * This helper will loop through all node-data in the LRU, either global or
+ * per-memcg. If memcg is either not present or not used,
+ * memcg_limited_groups_array_size will be 0. _idx starts at -1, and it will
+ * still be allowed to execute once.
+ *
+ * We convention that for _idx = -1, the global node info should be used.
+ * After that, we will go through each of the memcgs, starting at 0.
+ *
+ * We don't need any kind of locking for the loop because
+ * memcg_limited_groups_array_size can only grow, gaining new fields at the
+ * end. The old ones are just copied, and any interesting manipulation happen
+ * in the node list itself, and we already lock the list.
+ */
+#define for_each_memcg_lru_index(_idx) \
+ for ((_idx) = -1; ((_idx) < memcg_limited_groups_array_size); (_idx)++)
+
int
list_lru_add(
struct list_lru *lru,
@@ -139,10 +156,19 @@ list_lru_del(
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_del);
unsigned long
-list_lru_count_node(struct list_lru *lru, int nid)
+list_lru_count_node_memcg(struct list_lru *lru, int nid,
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
{
long count = 0;
- struct list_lru_node *nlru = &lru->node[nid];
+ int memcg_id = -1;
+ struct list_lru_node *nlru;
+
+ if (memcg && memcg_kmem_is_active(memcg))
+ memcg_id = memcg_cache_id(memcg);
+
+ nlru = lru_node_of_index(lru, memcg_id, nid);
+ if (!nlru)
+ return 0;
spin_lock(&nlru->lock);
BUG_ON(nlru->nr_items < 0);
@@ -151,19 +177,28 @@ list_lru_count_node(struct list_lru *lru, int nid)
return count;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_count_node);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_count_node_memcg);
unsigned long
-list_lru_walk_node(
+list_lru_walk_node_memcg(
struct list_lru *lru,
int nid,
list_lru_walk_cb isolate,
void *cb_arg,
- unsigned long *nr_to_walk)
+ unsigned long *nr_to_walk,
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
{
- struct list_lru_node *nlru = &lru->node[nid];
struct list_head *item, *n;
unsigned long isolated = 0;
+ struct list_lru_node *nlru;
+ int memcg_id = -1;
+
+ if (memcg && memcg_kmem_is_active(memcg))
+ memcg_id = memcg_cache_id(memcg);
+
+ nlru = lru_node_of_index(lru, memcg_id, nid);
+ if (!nlru)
+ return 0;
spin_lock(&nlru->lock);
list_for_each_safe(item, n, &nlru->list) {
@@ -200,7 +235,7 @@ restart:
spin_unlock(&nlru->lock);
return isolated;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_walk_node);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_walk_node_memcg);
static unsigned long
list_lru_dispose_all_node(
@@ -208,23 +243,34 @@ list_lru_dispose_all_node(
int nid,
list_lru_dispose_cb dispose)
{
- struct list_lru_node *nlru = &lru->node[nid];
+ struct list_lru_node *nlru;
LIST_HEAD(dispose_list);
unsigned long disposed = 0;
+ int idx;
- spin_lock(&nlru->lock);
- while (!list_empty(&nlru->list)) {
- list_splice_init(&nlru->list, &dispose_list);
- disposed += nlru->nr_items;
- nlru->nr_items = 0;
- node_clear(nid, lru->active_nodes);
- spin_unlock(&nlru->lock);
-
- dispose(&dispose_list);
+ for_each_memcg_lru_index(idx) {
+ nlru = lru_node_of_index(lru, idx, nid);
+ if (!nlru)
+ continue;
spin_lock(&nlru->lock);
+ while (!list_empty(&nlru->list)) {
+ list_splice_init(&nlru->list, &dispose_list);
+
+ if (atomic_long_sub_and_test(nlru->nr_items,
+ &lru->node_totals[nid]))
+ node_clear(nid, lru->active_nodes);
+ disposed += nlru->nr_items;
+ nlru->nr_items = 0;
+ spin_unlock(&nlru->lock);
+
+ dispose(&dispose_list);
+
+ spin_lock(&nlru->lock);
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&nlru->lock);
}
- spin_unlock(&nlru->lock);
+
return disposed;
}
--
1.8.1.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-30 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-30 10:35 [PATCH v9 00/35] kmemcg shrinkers Glauber Costa
2013-05-30 10:35 ` [PATCH v9 02/35] super: fix calculation of shrinkable objects for small numbers Glauber Costa
2013-05-30 10:36 ` [PATCH v9 20/35] drivers: convert shrinkers to new count/scan API Glauber Costa
[not found] ` <1369910181-20026-1-git-send-email-glommer-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-30 10:35 ` [PATCH v9 01/35] fs: bump inode and dentry counters to long Glauber Costa
2013-05-30 10:35 ` [PATCH v9 03/35] dcache: convert dentry_stat.nr_unused to per-cpu counters Glauber Costa
2013-05-30 10:35 ` [PATCH v9 04/35] dentry: move to per-sb LRU locks Glauber Costa
2013-05-30 10:35 ` [PATCH v9 05/35] dcache: remove dentries from LRU before putting on dispose list Glauber Costa
2013-05-30 10:35 ` [PATCH v9 06/35] mm: new shrinker API Glauber Costa
2013-05-30 10:35 ` [PATCH v9 07/35] shrinker: convert superblock shrinkers to new API Glauber Costa
2013-05-30 10:35 ` [PATCH v9 08/35] list: add a new LRU list type Glauber Costa
2013-05-30 10:35 ` [PATCH v9 09/35] inode: convert inode lru list to generic lru list code Glauber Costa
2013-05-30 10:35 ` [PATCH v9 10/35] dcache: convert to use new lru list infrastructure Glauber Costa
2013-05-30 10:35 ` [PATCH v9 11/35] list_lru: per-node " Glauber Costa
2013-05-30 10:35 ` [PATCH v9 12/35] shrinker: add node awareness Glauber Costa
2013-05-30 10:35 ` [PATCH v9 13/35] vmscan: per-node deferred work Glauber Costa
2013-05-30 10:36 ` [PATCH v9 14/35] list_lru: per-node API Glauber Costa
2013-05-30 10:36 ` [PATCH v9 15/35] fs: convert inode and dentry shrinking to be node aware Glauber Costa
2013-05-30 10:36 ` [PATCH v9 16/35] xfs: convert buftarg LRU to generic code Glauber Costa
2013-05-30 10:36 ` [PATCH v9 17/35] xfs: rework buffer dispose list tracking Glauber Costa
2013-05-30 10:36 ` [PATCH v9 18/35] xfs: convert dquot cache lru to list_lru Glauber Costa
2013-05-30 10:36 ` [PATCH v9 19/35] fs: convert fs shrinkers to new scan/count API Glauber Costa
2013-05-30 10:36 ` [PATCH v9 21/35] i915: bail out earlier when shrinker cannot acquire mutex Glauber Costa
2013-05-30 10:36 ` [PATCH v9 22/35] shrinker: convert remaining shrinkers to count/scan API Glauber Costa
2013-05-30 10:36 ` [PATCH v9 23/35] hugepage: convert huge zero page shrinker to new shrinker API Glauber Costa
2013-05-30 10:36 ` [PATCH v9 24/35] shrinker: Kill old ->shrink API Glauber Costa
2013-05-30 10:36 ` [PATCH v9 25/35] vmscan: also shrink slab in memcg pressure Glauber Costa
2013-05-30 10:36 ` [PATCH v9 26/35] memcg,list_lru: duplicate LRUs upon kmemcg creation Glauber Costa
2013-05-30 10:36 ` [PATCH v9 27/35] lru: add an element to a memcg list Glauber Costa
2013-05-30 10:36 ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2013-05-30 10:36 ` [PATCH v9 29/35] memcg: per-memcg kmem shrinking Glauber Costa
2013-05-30 10:36 ` [PATCH v9 30/35] memcg: scan cache objects hierarchically Glauber Costa
2013-05-30 10:36 ` [PATCH v9 32/35] super: targeted memcg reclaim Glauber Costa
2013-05-30 10:36 ` [PATCH v9 33/35] memcg: move initialization to memcg creation Glauber Costa
2013-05-30 10:36 ` [PATCH v9 34/35] vmpressure: in-kernel notifications Glauber Costa
2013-05-30 10:36 ` [PATCH v9 35/35] memcg: reap dead memcgs upon global memory pressure Glauber Costa
2013-05-30 10:36 ` [PATCH v9 31/35] vmscan: take at least one pass with shrinkers Glauber Costa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1369910181-20026-29-git-send-email-glommer@openvz.org \
--to=glommer-gefaqzzx7r8dnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
--cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
--cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=david-FqsqvQoI3Ljby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dchinner-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=gthelen-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hughd-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mgorman-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=riel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).