From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, matthew@wil.cx, bfields@fieldses.org
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, sage@inktank.com, smfrench@gmail.com,
swhiteho@redhat.com, Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org,
cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, piastryyy@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 06/14] locks: encapsulate the fl_link list handling
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 08:58:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1371819502-26363-7-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1371819502-26363-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com>
Move the fl_link list handling routines into a separate set of helpers.
Also ensure that locks and requests are always put on global lists
last (after fully initializing them) and are taken off before unintializing
them.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
---
fs/locks.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
index 1d6cb28..89d898b 100644
--- a/fs/locks.c
+++ b/fs/locks.c
@@ -153,13 +153,15 @@ int lease_break_time = 45;
#define for_each_lock(inode, lockp) \
for (lockp = &inode->i_flock; *lockp != NULL; lockp = &(*lockp)->fl_next)
+/* The global file_lock_list is only used for displaying /proc/locks. */
static LIST_HEAD(file_lock_list);
+
+/* The blocked_list is used to find POSIX lock loops for deadlock detection. */
static LIST_HEAD(blocked_list);
+
+/* Protects the two list heads above, plus the inode->i_flock list */
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(file_lock_lock);
-/*
- * Protects the two list heads above, plus the inode->i_flock list
- */
void lock_flocks(void)
{
spin_lock(&file_lock_lock);
@@ -484,13 +486,37 @@ static int posix_same_owner(struct file_lock *fl1, struct file_lock *fl2)
return fl1->fl_owner == fl2->fl_owner;
}
+static inline void
+locks_insert_global_locks(struct file_lock *fl)
+{
+ list_add_tail(&fl->fl_link, &file_lock_list);
+}
+
+static inline void
+locks_delete_global_locks(struct file_lock *fl)
+{
+ list_del_init(&fl->fl_link);
+}
+
+static inline void
+locks_insert_global_blocked(struct file_lock *waiter)
+{
+ list_add(&waiter->fl_link, &blocked_list);
+}
+
+static inline void
+locks_delete_global_blocked(struct file_lock *waiter)
+{
+ list_del_init(&waiter->fl_link);
+}
+
/* Remove waiter from blocker's block list.
* When blocker ends up pointing to itself then the list is empty.
*/
static void __locks_delete_block(struct file_lock *waiter)
{
+ locks_delete_global_blocked(waiter);
list_del_init(&waiter->fl_block);
- list_del_init(&waiter->fl_link);
waiter->fl_next = NULL;
}
@@ -512,10 +538,10 @@ static void locks_insert_block(struct file_lock *blocker,
struct file_lock *waiter)
{
BUG_ON(!list_empty(&waiter->fl_block));
- list_add_tail(&waiter->fl_block, &blocker->fl_block);
waiter->fl_next = blocker;
+ list_add_tail(&waiter->fl_block, &blocker->fl_block);
if (IS_POSIX(blocker))
- list_add(&waiter->fl_link, &blocked_list);
+ locks_insert_global_blocked(request);
}
/*
@@ -543,13 +569,13 @@ static void locks_wake_up_blocks(struct file_lock *blocker)
*/
static void locks_insert_lock(struct file_lock **pos, struct file_lock *fl)
{
- list_add(&fl->fl_link, &file_lock_list);
-
fl->fl_nspid = get_pid(task_tgid(current));
/* insert into file's list */
fl->fl_next = *pos;
*pos = fl;
+
+ locks_insert_global_locks(fl);
}
/*
@@ -562,9 +588,10 @@ static void locks_delete_lock(struct file_lock **thisfl_p)
{
struct file_lock *fl = *thisfl_p;
+ locks_delete_global_locks(fl);
+
*thisfl_p = fl->fl_next;
fl->fl_next = NULL;
- list_del_init(&fl->fl_link);
if (fl->fl_nspid) {
put_pid(fl->fl_nspid);
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-21 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-21 12:58 [PATCH v4 00/14] locks: scalability improvements for file locking Jeff Layton
2013-06-21 12:58 ` [PATCH v4 01/14] locks: drop the unused filp argument to posix_unblock_lock Jeff Layton
2013-06-21 12:58 ` [PATCH v4 02/14] cifs: use posix_unblock_lock instead of locks_delete_block Jeff Layton
2013-06-21 12:58 ` [PATCH v4 03/14] locks: make generic_add_lease and generic_delete_lease static Jeff Layton
2013-06-21 12:58 ` [PATCH v4 04/14] locks: comment cleanups and clarifications Jeff Layton
2013-06-21 12:58 ` [PATCH v4 05/14] locks: make "added" in __posix_lock_file a bool Jeff Layton
2013-06-21 12:58 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
[not found] ` <1371819502-26363-7-git-send-email-jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-25 1:37 ` [PATCH v4 06/14] locks: encapsulate the fl_link list handling Stephen Rothwell
[not found] ` <20130625113704.89a686a55dcec684e5e99434-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-25 10:32 ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-21 12:58 ` [PATCH v4 07/14] locks: protect most of the file_lock handling with i_lock Jeff Layton
2013-06-21 12:58 ` [PATCH v4 08/14] locks: avoid taking global lock if possible when waking up blocked waiters Jeff Layton
2013-06-21 12:58 ` [PATCH v4 09/14] locks: convert fl_link to a hlist_node Jeff Layton
[not found] ` <1371819502-26363-1-git-send-email-jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-21 12:58 ` [PATCH v4 10/14] locks: turn the blocked_list into a hashtable Jeff Layton
2013-06-21 12:58 ` [PATCH v4 11/14] locks: add a new "lm_owner_key" lock operation Jeff Layton
2013-06-21 12:58 ` [PATCH v4 12/14] locks: give the blocked_hash its own spinlock Jeff Layton
2013-06-21 12:58 ` [PATCH v4 13/14] seq_file: add seq_list_*_percpu helpers Jeff Layton
2013-06-21 12:58 ` [PATCH v4 14/14] locks: move file_lock_list to a set of percpu hlist_heads and convert file_lock_lock to an lglock Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1371819502-26363-7-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com \
--to=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=piastryyy@gmail.com \
--cc=sage@inktank.com \
--cc=samba-technical@lists.samba.org \
--cc=smfrench@gmail.com \
--cc=swhiteho@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).