From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/21] FS-Cache: Release page->private in failed readahead
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2006 10:18:56 +0100
Message-ID: <13728.1152263936@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com>
References: <20060706185626.e2b9a6f6.akpm@osdl.org>  <20060706145424.18779.55583.stgit@lade.trondhjem.org> <20060706151057.18779.29653.stgit@lade.trondhjem.org>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:26261 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932080AbWGGJTI (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 7 Jul 2006 05:19:08 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20060706185626.e2b9a6f6.akpm@osdl.org> 
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:

> This has two callsites and is too large to inline.

The compiler may inline it anyway, but that's up to it.

I think this is the only bit of your extra patches that I've missed.  I'll add
it.

> Did any other patches got lost? (and signed-off-bys..)

Not at as far as I know.

David