From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vyacheslav Dubeyko Subject: Re: [PATCH] nilfs2: correct logic of translation virtual blocks number into physical ones Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 13:24:55 +0400 Message-ID: <1372843495.2230.8.camel@slavad-ubuntu> References: <1372674852.2198.23.camel@slavad-ubuntu> <20130702.010238.65450534.konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp> Reply-To: slava@dubeyko.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, bryce@gibson-consulting.com.au, Linux FS Devel , Andrew Morton To: Ryusuke Konishi Return-path: Received: from oproxy7-pub.bluehost.com ([67.222.55.9]:42376 "HELO oproxy7-pub.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753479Ab3GCJZI (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jul 2013 05:25:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130702.010238.65450534.konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Ryusuke, On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 01:02 +0900, Ryusuke Konishi wrote: [snip] > Vyacheslav, this patch breaks snapshot mounts because past blocks > deleted from the current file system have an end checkpoint number > smaller than the current checkpoint number. > Yes, you are right. It needs to rework this patch. I will be on vacation during next two weeks. And then, after vacation, I continue to work with patches and fixes for NILFS2. I will keep silence during my vacation time. Thank you for the remark. > Also, the title of this patch looks wrong. You are trying to insert a > sanity check in the translation logic. It doesn't correct translation > logic itself, nor removes the cause of reported problem. > > I think the title of this patch should be "nilfs2: insert sanity check > in translation logic of ..." or so. Ok. I agree. With the best regards, Vyacheslav Dubeyko. > > Regards, > Ryusuke Konishi >