From: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>
To: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org,
DanCarpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nilfs2: remove double bio_put() in nilfs_end_bio_write() for BIO_EOPNOTSUPP error
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 11:46:51 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1374565611.2220.11.camel@slavad-ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130723.032458.480817929.konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Hi Ryusuke,
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 03:24 +0900, Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
[snip]
>
> Thank you for following the issue. I reviewed the code around bio.
>
> In conclusion, Dan Carpenter's patch looks correct because
> nilfs_segbuf_submit_bio() does not increment the number of flying bio
> (segbuf->sb_nbio) for EOPNOTSUPP/BIO_EOPNOTSUPP case.
>
I worry that nilfs_end_bio_write() is called asynchronously. And, as I
understand, the BIO_EOPNOTSUPP flag is set during nilfs_end_bio_write()
call. It means for me that sometimes segbuf->sb_nbio will be not
incremented in nilfs_segbuf_submit_bio() but sometimes this field can be
incremented and for BIO_EOPNOTSUPP case.
> If nilfs_end_bio_write() function reaches the complete() call for the
> EOPNOTSUPP/BIO_EOPNOTSUPP case (as the current implementation), the
> number of complete() calls and that of wait_for_complete() will not
> balance.
>
I think that it is dangerous to return without complete() call because
of asynchronous nature of nilfs_end_bio_write() call.
What do you think?
With the best regards,
Vyacheslav Dubeyko.
> Do you have a comment?
>
> Regards,
> Ryusuke Konishi
>
> > ---
> > fs/nilfs2/segbuf.c | 3 +--
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/segbuf.c b/fs/nilfs2/segbuf.c
> > index dc9a913..5bacf46 100644
> > --- a/fs/nilfs2/segbuf.c
> > +++ b/fs/nilfs2/segbuf.c
> > @@ -345,8 +345,7 @@ static void nilfs_end_bio_write(struct bio *bio, int err)
> >
> > if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP) {
> > set_bit(BIO_EOPNOTSUPP, &bio->bi_flags);
> > - bio_put(bio);
> > - /* to be detected by submit_seg_bio() */
> > + /* to be detected by nilfs_segbuf_submit_bio() */
> > }
> >
> > if (!uptodate)
> > --
> > 1.7.9.5
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-23 7:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-22 8:02 [PATCH] nilfs2: remove double bio_put() in nilfs_end_bio_write() for BIO_EOPNOTSUPP error Vyacheslav Dubeyko
2013-07-22 18:24 ` Ryusuke Konishi
2013-07-23 7:46 ` Vyacheslav Dubeyko [this message]
2013-07-23 17:24 ` Ryusuke Konishi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1374565611.2220.11.camel@slavad-ubuntu \
--to=slava@dubeyko.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).