linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	samba-technical@lists.samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 07/13] locks: simplify overflow checking
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 08:34:19 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1387460065-28269-8-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1387460065-28269-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com>

From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>

Or maybe we don't actually care about indicating overflow in the 32-bit
case: sure we could fail if e.g. f_pos+start or f_pos+start+len would
exceed 32-bits, but do we really need to?

Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
---
 fs/locks.c | 23 +++++------------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
index 863f4df..1555b05 100644
--- a/fs/locks.c
+++ b/fs/locks.c
@@ -344,8 +344,8 @@ static int assign_type(struct file_lock *fl, long type)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int flock_to_posix_lock_common(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl,
-					struct flock64 *l, loff_t offset_max)
+static int flock64_to_posix_lock(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl,
+				 struct flock64 *l)
 {
 	switch (l->l_whence) {
 	case SEEK_SET:
@@ -360,12 +360,12 @@ static int flock_to_posix_lock_common(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl,
 	default:
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
-	if (l->l_start > offset_max - fl->fl_start)
+	if (l->l_start > OFFSET_MAX - fl->fl_start)
 		return -EOVERFLOW;
 	fl->fl_start += l->l_start;
 	if (fl->fl_start < 0)
 		return -EINVAL;
-	if (l->l_len > offset_max - fl->fl_start)
+	if (l->l_len > OFFSET_MAX - fl->fl_start)
 		return -EOVERFLOW;
 	if (fl->fl_start + l->l_len < 0)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -403,22 +403,9 @@ static int flock_to_posix_lock(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl,
 		.l_len = l->l_len,
 	};
 
-	/*
-	 * The use of OFFT_OFFSET_MAX here ensures we return -EOVERFLOW
-	 * if the start or end of the lock could not be represented as
-	 * an off_t, following SUSv3.
-	 */
-	return flock_to_posix_lock_common(filp, fl, &ll, OFFT_OFFSET_MAX);
+	return flock64_to_posix_lock(filp, fl, &ll);
 }
 
-#if BITS_PER_LONG == 32
-static int flock64_to_posix_lock(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl,
-				 struct flock64 *l)
-{
-	return flock_to_posix_lock_common(filp, fl, l, OFFSET_MAX);
-}
-#endif
-
 /* default lease lock manager operations */
 static void lease_break_callback(struct file_lock *fl)
 {
-- 
1.8.4.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-12-19 13:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-19 13:34 [PATCH v4 00/13] locks: implement "filp-private" (aka UNPOSIX) locks Jeff Layton
2013-12-19 13:34 ` [PATCH v4 01/13] locks: close potential race between setlease and open Jeff Layton
2013-12-19 13:34 ` [PATCH v4 02/13] locks: clean up comment typo Jeff Layton
2013-12-19 13:34 ` [PATCH v4 03/13] locks: remove "inline" qualifier from fl_link manipulation functions Jeff Layton
2013-12-19 13:34 ` [PATCH v4 04/13] locks: add __acquires and __releases annotations to locks_start and locks_stop Jeff Layton
2013-12-19 13:34 ` [PATCH v4 05/13] locks: eliminate BUG() call when there's an unexpected lock on file close Jeff Layton
2013-12-19 13:34 ` [PATCH v4 06/13] locks: consolidate common code in the flock_to_posix_lock routines Jeff Layton
2013-12-19 13:34 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2013-12-19 13:34 ` [PATCH v4 08/13] locks: consolidate checks for compatible filp->f_mode values in setlk handlers Jeff Layton
2013-12-19 13:34 ` [PATCH v4 09/13] locks: don't reference original flock struct in F_GETLK handlers Jeff Layton
2013-12-19 13:34 ` [PATCH v4 10/13] locks: rename locks_remove_flock to locks_remove_file Jeff Layton
2013-12-19 13:34 ` [PATCH v4 11/13] locks: show private lock types in /proc/locks Jeff Layton
2013-12-19 13:34 ` [PATCH v4 12/13] locks: report l_pid as -1 for FL_FILE_PVT locks Jeff Layton
2013-12-19 13:34 ` [PATCH v4 13/13] locks: add new "private" lock type that is owned by the filp Jeff Layton
2013-12-19 13:52 ` [PATCH v4 00/13] locks: implement "filp-private" (aka UNPOSIX) locks Scott Lovenberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1387460065-28269-8-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com \
    --to=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=samba-technical@lists.samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).