From: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>
To: Sergei Antonov <saproj@gmail.com>
Cc: "htl10@users.sourceforge.net" <htl10@users.sourceforge.net>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: A few thoughts on hfsplus dev (Re: [PATCH v2] hfsplus: add journal replay)
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 19:09:14 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1396019354.2043.8.camel@slavad-CELSIUS-H720> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABikg9x+eRTh5VLBVJDD9d-t+H0bUhNQ7NQ-M10rkXQwtFKRyQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 14:42 +0100, Sergei Antonov wrote:
> >
> > I have such principal points:
> > (1) On-disk layout declarations should live in peace with Technical Note
> > TN1150;
> > (2) Journal replay should be transaction based.
>
> Could you clarify "transaction based"? Seriously. Because since there
> are transactions in HFS+ journal, all replay implementations are
> transaction-based in a way.
I suppose that I described my vision very clearly in previous e-mails.
Sorry, I don't see any necessity to repeat the same things.
If you want to ask something, please, ask concrete question. Because,
from my point of view, we had deep discussion earlier. And our
discussion hasn't goal to elaborate theoretical principles of
transaction approach. So, your current question is not concrete for me.
If you want to suggest something, please, do it. But, please, suggest
something new and don't suggest the same things.
Thanks,
Vyacheslav Dubeyko.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-28 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-24 10:05 [PATCH v2] hfsplus: add journal replay Sergei Antonov
2014-02-24 10:21 ` Vyacheslav Dubeyko
2014-03-09 16:36 ` Vyacheslav Dubeyko
2014-03-09 22:50 ` Sergei Antonov
2014-03-13 10:20 ` Vyacheslav Dubeyko
2014-03-13 20:04 ` Sergei Antonov
2014-03-23 23:15 ` A few thoughts on hfsplus dev (Re: [PATCH v2] hfsplus: add journal replay) Hin-Tak Leung
2014-03-24 6:56 ` Vyacheslav Dubeyko
2014-03-25 1:37 ` Sergei Antonov
2014-03-25 6:30 ` Vyacheslav Dubeyko
2014-03-28 13:42 ` Sergei Antonov
2014-03-28 15:09 ` Vyacheslav Dubeyko [this message]
2014-03-28 20:04 ` Sergei Antonov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-04-04 23:35 Hin-Tak Leung
2014-04-06 20:59 ` Sergei Antonov
2014-04-05 1:02 Hin-Tak Leung
2014-04-06 16:01 ` Sergei Antonov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1396019354.2043.8.camel@slavad-CELSIUS-H720 \
--to=slava@dubeyko.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=htl10@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saproj@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).