From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] f2fs: use MAX_BIO_BLOCKS(sbi) Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 15:34:51 -0700 Message-ID: <1410734091.917.26.camel@joe-AO725> References: <1410732864-53069-1-git-send-email-jaegeuk@kernel.org> <1410732864-53069-9-git-send-email-jaegeuk@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To: Jaegeuk Kim Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1410732864-53069-9-git-send-email-jaegeuk@kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2014-09-14 at 15:14 -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > This patch cleans up a simple macro. There seems to be many different types used here. MAX_BIO_BLOCKS returns unsigned int bio_blocks is int, blocks_per_seg is unsigned int, ra_meta_pages(,,int,) nr_pages_to_skip uses int nr_pages_to_write returns a long Perhaps it'd be nicer to standardize the type so there'd be fewer promotions/implicit casts.