From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Subject: [Patch 3.14 stable 08/16] dcache: don't need rcu in shrink_dentry_list()
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 11:37:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1415302640-5876-9-git-send-email-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1415302640-5876-1-git-send-email-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Since now the shrink list is private and nobody can free the dentry while
it is on the shrink list, we can remove RCU protection from this.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
(cherry picked from commit 60942f2f235ce7b817166cdf355eed729094834d)
---
fs/dcache.c | 27 ++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
index 752db63..d20bae3 100644
--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@ -795,23 +795,9 @@ static void shrink_dentry_list(struct list_head *list)
{
struct dentry *dentry, *parent;
- rcu_read_lock();
- for (;;) {
- dentry = list_entry_rcu(list->prev, struct dentry, d_lru);
- if (&dentry->d_lru == list)
- break; /* empty */
-
- /*
- * Get the dentry lock, and re-verify that the dentry is
- * this on the shrinking list. If it is, we know that
- * DCACHE_SHRINK_LIST and DCACHE_LRU_LIST are set.
- */
+ while (!list_empty(list)) {
+ dentry = list_entry(list->prev, struct dentry, d_lru);
spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
- if (dentry != list_entry(list->prev, struct dentry, d_lru)) {
- spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
- continue;
- }
-
/*
* The dispose list is isolated and dentries are not accounted
* to the LRU here, so we can simply remove it from the list
@@ -827,23 +813,20 @@ static void shrink_dentry_list(struct list_head *list)
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
continue;
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
parent = dentry_kill(dentry, 0);
/*
* If dentry_kill returns NULL, we have nothing more to do.
*/
- if (!parent) {
- rcu_read_lock();
+ if (!parent)
continue;
- }
+
if (unlikely(parent == dentry)) {
/*
* trylocks have failed and d_lock has been held the
* whole time, so it could not have been added to any
* other lists. Just add it back to the shrink list.
*/
- rcu_read_lock();
d_shrink_add(dentry, list);
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
continue;
@@ -857,9 +840,7 @@ static void shrink_dentry_list(struct list_head *list)
dentry = parent;
while (dentry && !lockref_put_or_lock(&dentry->d_lockref))
dentry = dentry_kill(dentry, 1);
- rcu_read_lock();
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
}
static enum lru_status
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-06 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-06 19:37 [Patch 3.14 stable 00/16] vfs: fix dentry shrink list corruption Cong Wang
2014-11-06 19:37 ` [Patch 3.14 stable 01/16] fold d_kill() and d_free() Cong Wang
2015-05-18 17:44 ` Greg KH
2015-05-21 0:31 ` [PATCH 3.14] " Vinson Lee
2015-05-21 0:31 ` [PATCH] " Vinson Lee
2015-06-29 23:56 ` [PATCH 3.14] " Greg KH
2014-11-06 19:37 ` [Patch 3.14 stable 02/16] fold try_prune_one_dentry() Cong Wang
2014-11-06 19:37 ` [Patch 3.14 stable 03/16] new helper: dentry_free() Cong Wang
2014-11-06 19:37 ` [Patch 3.14 stable 04/16] expand the call of dentry_lru_del() in dentry_kill() Cong Wang
2014-11-06 19:37 ` [Patch 3.14 stable 05/16] dentry_kill(): don't try to remove from shrink list Cong Wang
2014-11-06 19:37 ` [Patch 3.14 stable 06/16] don't remove from shrink list in select_collect() Cong Wang
2014-11-06 19:37 ` [Patch 3.14 stable 07/16] more graceful recovery in umount_collect() Cong Wang
2014-11-06 19:37 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2014-11-06 19:37 ` [Patch 3.14 stable 09/16] lift the "already marked killed" case into shrink_dentry_list() Cong Wang
2014-11-06 19:37 ` [Patch 3.14 stable 10/16] split dentry_kill() Cong Wang
2014-11-06 19:37 ` [Patch 3.14 stable 11/16] expand dentry_kill(dentry, 0) in shrink_dentry_list() Cong Wang
2014-11-06 19:37 ` [Patch 3.14 stable 12/16] shrink_dentry_list(): take parent's ->d_lock earlier Cong Wang
2014-11-06 19:37 ` [Patch 3.14 stable 13/16] dealing with the rest of shrink_dentry_list() livelock Cong Wang
2014-11-06 19:37 ` [Patch 3.14 stable 14/16] dentry_kill() doesn't need the second argument now Cong Wang
2014-11-06 19:37 ` [Patch 3.14 stable 15/16] dcache: add missing lockdep annotation Cong Wang
2014-11-06 19:37 ` [Patch 3.14 stable 16/16] lock_parent: don't step on stale ->d_parent of all-but-freed one Cong Wang
2015-02-03 23:11 ` [Patch 3.14 stable 00/16] vfs: fix dentry shrink list corruption Greg KH
2015-02-04 3:30 ` Cong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1415302640-5876-9-git-send-email-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mszeredi@suse.cz \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).