From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: [PATCH-v2 3/5] vfs: don't let the dirty time inodes get more than a day stale
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 11:54:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1416675267-2191-4-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1416675267-2191-1-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu>
Guarantee that the on-disk timestamps will be no more than 24 hours
stale.
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 1 +
fs/inode.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
include/linux/fs.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index ce7de22..eb04277 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -1141,6 +1141,7 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags)
if (flags & (I_DIRTY_SYNC | I_DIRTY_DATASYNC)) {
trace_writeback_dirty_inode_start(inode, flags);
+ inode->i_ts_dirty_day = 0;
if (sb->s_op->dirty_inode)
sb->s_op->dirty_inode(inode, flags);
diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index 11fe81b..0d939a8 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -1511,6 +1511,7 @@ static int relatime_need_update(struct vfsmount *mnt, struct inode *inode,
*/
static int update_time(struct inode *inode, struct timespec *time, int flags)
{
+ unsigned short days_since_boot = jiffies / (HZ * 86400);
int ret;
if (inode->i_op->update_time) {
@@ -1527,14 +1528,27 @@ static int update_time(struct inode *inode, struct timespec *time, int flags)
if (flags & S_MTIME)
inode->i_mtime = *time;
}
- if (inode->i_sb->s_flags & MS_LAZYTIME) {
+ /*
+ * If i_ts_dirty_day is zero, then either we have not deferred
+ * timestamp updates, or the system has been up for less than
+ * a day (so days_since_boot is zero), so we defer timestamp
+ * updates in that case and set the I_DIRTY_TIME flag. If a
+ * day or more has passed, then i_ts_dirty_day will be
+ * different from days_since_boot, and then we should update
+ * the on-disk inode and then we can clear i_ts_dirty_day.
+ */
+ if ((inode->i_sb->s_flags & MS_LAZYTIME) &&
+ (!inode->i_ts_dirty_day ||
+ inode->i_ts_dirty_day == days_since_boot)) {
if (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_TIME)
return 0;
spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
inode->i_state |= I_DIRTY_TIME;
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+ inode->i_ts_dirty_day = days_since_boot;
return 0;
}
+ inode->i_ts_dirty_day = 0;
if (inode->i_op->write_time)
return inode->i_op->write_time(inode);
mark_inode_dirty_sync(inode);
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 489b2f2..e3574cd 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -575,6 +575,7 @@ struct inode {
struct timespec i_ctime;
spinlock_t i_lock; /* i_blocks, i_bytes, maybe i_size */
unsigned short i_bytes;
+ unsigned short i_ts_dirty_day;
unsigned int i_blkbits;
blkcnt_t i_blocks;
--
2.1.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-22 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-22 16:54 [PATCH-v2 0/5] add support for a lazytime mount option Theodore Ts'o
2014-11-22 16:54 ` [PATCH-v2 1/5] fs: split update_time() into update_time() and write_time() Theodore Ts'o
2014-11-22 16:54 ` [PATCH-v2 2/5] vfs: add support for a lazytime mount option Theodore Ts'o
2014-11-22 16:54 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2014-11-24 12:27 ` [PATCH-v2 3/5] vfs: don't let the dirty time inodes get more than a day stale Rasmus Villemoes
2014-11-24 17:10 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-11-22 16:54 ` [PATCH-v2 4/5] vfs: add lazytime tracepoints for better debugging Theodore Ts'o
2014-11-22 16:54 ` [PATCH-v2 5/5] ext4: add support for a lazytime mount option Theodore Ts'o
2014-11-24 9:07 ` [PATCH-v2 0/5] " Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-24 11:57 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-11-24 22:11 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-11-25 0:32 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1416675267-2191-4-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).