From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Mason Subject: Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM TOPIC]: Btrfs: Decoupling block-size and page-size in BTRFS. Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 09:06:53 -0500 Message-ID: <1417442813.14154.0@mail.thefacebook.com> References: <4053596.iiH0KJPrOm@localhost.localdomain> <20141201101353.GA763@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Cc: Chandan Rajendra , , , To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Received: from mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com ([67.231.145.42]:63320 "EHLO mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753767AbaLAOH1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2014 09:07:27 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20141201101353.GA763@infradead.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 5:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Is this topic relevant for the broarder FS community? Maybe the btrfs > community should look into organizing a meeting co-hosted with Vault > similar to what we did for ext4 and XFS in the past? Yeah, this is a very btrfs specific topic. I'm happy to organize an official Btrfs sub-topic as part of vault or LSF. -chris