From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: [PATCH 22/45] writeback: make bdi_start_background_writeback() take bdi_writeback instead of backing_dev_info Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 16:25:59 -0500 Message-ID: <1420579582-8516-23-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> References: <1420579582-8516-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, hch@infradead.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, vgoyal@redhat.com, lizefan@huawei.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, mhocko@suse.cz, clm@fb.com, fengguang.wu@intel.com, david@fromorbit.com, Tejun Heo To: axboe@kernel.dk Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1420579582-8516-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org bdi_start_background_writeback() currently takes @bdi and kicks the root wb (bdi_writeback). In preparation for cgroup writeback support, make it take wb instead. This patch doesn't make any functional difference. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Cc: Jens Axboe Cc: Jan Kara --- fs/fs-writeback.c | 12 ++++++------ include/linux/backing-dev.h | 2 +- mm/page-writeback.c | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c index 6ab113b..c209ff1 100644 --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c @@ -244,23 +244,23 @@ void wb_start_writeback(struct bdi_writeback *wb, long nr_pages, } /** - * bdi_start_background_writeback - start background writeback - * @bdi: the backing device to write from + * wb_start_background_writeback - start background writeback + * @wb: bdi_writback to write from * * Description: * This makes sure WB_SYNC_NONE background writeback happens. When - * this function returns, it is only guaranteed that for given BDI + * this function returns, it is only guaranteed that for given wb * some IO is happening if we are over background dirty threshold. * Caller need not hold sb s_umount semaphore. */ -void bdi_start_background_writeback(struct backing_dev_info *bdi) +void wb_start_background_writeback(struct bdi_writeback *wb) { /* * We just wake up the flusher thread. It will perform background * writeback as soon as there is no other work to do. */ - trace_writeback_wake_background(bdi); - wb_wakeup(&bdi->wb); + trace_writeback_wake_background(wb->bdi); + wb_wakeup(wb); } /** diff --git a/include/linux/backing-dev.h b/include/linux/backing-dev.h index 953fa01..4cdab7c 100644 --- a/include/linux/backing-dev.h +++ b/include/linux/backing-dev.h @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ void bdi_unregister(struct backing_dev_info *bdi); int __must_check bdi_setup_and_register(struct backing_dev_info *, char *, unsigned int); void wb_start_writeback(struct bdi_writeback *wb, long nr_pages, bool range_cyclic, enum wb_reason reason); -void bdi_start_background_writeback(struct backing_dev_info *bdi); +void wb_start_background_writeback(struct bdi_writeback *wb); void wb_workfn(struct work_struct *work); void wb_wakeup_delayed(struct bdi_writeback *wb); diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c index b250ee2..4cf365c 100644 --- a/mm/page-writeback.c +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c @@ -1450,7 +1450,7 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping, } if (unlikely(!writeback_in_progress(wb))) - bdi_start_background_writeback(bdi); + wb_start_background_writeback(wb); if (!strictlimit) wb_dirty_limits(wb, dirty_thresh, background_thresh, @@ -1583,7 +1583,7 @@ pause: return; if (nr_reclaimable > background_thresh) - bdi_start_background_writeback(bdi); + wb_start_background_writeback(wb); } static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, bdp_ratelimits); -- 2.1.0 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org