* [PATCH] x86: Revert E820_PRAM change in e820_end_pfn()
@ 2015-04-06 17:47 Toshi Kani
2015-04-06 18:29 ` Yinghai Lu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Toshi Kani @ 2015-04-06 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mingo, hpa, tglx
Cc: linux-nvdimm, linux-fsdevel, x86, linux-kernel, hch, boaz,
Yinghai Lu, Toshi Kani
'Commit ec776ef6bbe17 ("x86/mm: Add support for the non-standard
protected e820 type")' added E820_PRAM ranges, which do not have
have struct-page. Therefore, there is no need to update max_pfn
to cover the E820_PRAM ranges. Revert the change made to account
E820_PRAM as RAM in e820_end_pfn() in the commit.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Tested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
The patch is based on the tip branch.
---
arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
index e2ce85d..4dfe4bd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
@@ -763,11 +763,7 @@ static unsigned long __init e820_end_pfn(unsigned long limit_pfn)
unsigned long start_pfn;
unsigned long end_pfn;
- /*
- * Persistent memory is accounted as ram for purposes of
- * establishing max_pfn and mem_map.
- */
- if (ei->type != E820_RAM && ei->type != E820_PRAM)
+ if (ei->type != E820_RAM)
continue;
start_pfn = ei->addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] x86: Revert E820_PRAM change in e820_end_pfn() 2015-04-06 17:47 [PATCH] x86: Revert E820_PRAM change in e820_end_pfn() Toshi Kani @ 2015-04-06 18:29 ` Yinghai Lu 2015-04-06 18:36 ` Toshi Kani 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Yinghai Lu @ 2015-04-06 18:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Toshi Kani Cc: Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Thomas Gleixner, linux-nvdimm, linux-fsdevel, the arch/x86 maintainers, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Christoph Hellwig, Boaz Harrosh [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1444 bytes --] On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> wrote: > 'Commit ec776ef6bbe17 ("x86/mm: Add support for the non-standard > protected e820 type")' added E820_PRAM ranges, which do not have > have struct-page. Therefore, there is no need to update max_pfn > to cover the E820_PRAM ranges. Revert the change made to account > E820_PRAM as RAM in e820_end_pfn() in the commit. > > Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> > Tested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> > --- > The patch is based on the tip branch. > --- > arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 6 +----- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c > index e2ce85d..4dfe4bd 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c > @@ -763,11 +763,7 @@ static unsigned long __init e820_end_pfn(unsigned long limit_pfn) > unsigned long start_pfn; > unsigned long end_pfn; > > - /* > - * Persistent memory is accounted as ram for purposes of > - * establishing max_pfn and mem_map. > - */ > - if (ei->type != E820_RAM && ei->type != E820_PRAM) > + if (ei->type != E820_RAM) > continue; > > start_pfn = ei->addr >> PAGE_SHIFT; Please use attached for code change. Thanks Yinghai [-- Attachment #2: revert_end_of_ram_change.patch --] [-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1373 bytes --] --- arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 12 ++++-------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c @@ -752,7 +752,7 @@ u64 __init early_reserve_e820(u64 size, /* * Find the highest page frame number we have available */ -static unsigned long __init e820_end_pfn(unsigned long limit_pfn) +static unsigned long __init e820_end_pfn(unsigned long limit_pfn, unsigned type) { int i; unsigned long last_pfn = 0; @@ -763,11 +763,7 @@ static unsigned long __init e820_end_pfn unsigned long start_pfn; unsigned long end_pfn; - /* - * Persistent memory is accounted as ram for purposes of - * establishing max_pfn and mem_map. - */ - if (ei->type != E820_RAM && ei->type != E820_PRAM) + if (ei->type != type) continue; start_pfn = ei->addr >> PAGE_SHIFT; @@ -792,12 +788,12 @@ static unsigned long __init e820_end_pfn } unsigned long __init e820_end_of_ram_pfn(void) { - return e820_end_pfn(MAX_ARCH_PFN); + return e820_end_pfn(MAX_ARCH_PFN, E820_RAM); } unsigned long __init e820_end_of_low_ram_pfn(void) { - return e820_end_pfn(1UL << (32-PAGE_SHIFT)); + return e820_end_pfn(1UL<<(32 - PAGE_SHIFT), E820_RAM); } static void early_panic(char *msg) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] x86: Revert E820_PRAM change in e820_end_pfn() 2015-04-06 18:29 ` Yinghai Lu @ 2015-04-06 18:36 ` Toshi Kani 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Toshi Kani @ 2015-04-06 18:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yinghai Lu Cc: Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Thomas Gleixner, linux-nvdimm, linux-fsdevel, the arch/x86 maintainers, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Christoph Hellwig, Boaz Harrosh On Mon, 2015-04-06 at 11:29 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> wrote: > > 'Commit ec776ef6bbe17 ("x86/mm: Add support for the non-standard > > protected e820 type")' added E820_PRAM ranges, which do not have > > have struct-page. Therefore, there is no need to update max_pfn > > to cover the E820_PRAM ranges. Revert the change made to account > > E820_PRAM as RAM in e820_end_pfn() in the commit. > > > > Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> > > Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> > > Tested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> > > --- > > The patch is based on the tip branch. > > --- > > arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 6 +----- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c > > index e2ce85d..4dfe4bd 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c > > @@ -763,11 +763,7 @@ static unsigned long __init e820_end_pfn(unsigned long limit_pfn) > > unsigned long start_pfn; > > unsigned long end_pfn; > > > > - /* > > - * Persistent memory is accounted as ram for purposes of > > - * establishing max_pfn and mem_map. > > - */ > > - if (ei->type != E820_RAM && ei->type != E820_PRAM) > > + if (ei->type != E820_RAM) > > continue; > > > > start_pfn = ei->addr >> PAGE_SHIFT; > > Please use attached for code change. Will do. Thanks, -Toshi ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-04-06 18:36 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2015-04-06 17:47 [PATCH] x86: Revert E820_PRAM change in e820_end_pfn() Toshi Kani 2015-04-06 18:29 ` Yinghai Lu 2015-04-06 18:36 ` Toshi Kani
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).