From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: xfs: does mkfs.xfs require fancy switches to get decent
 performance? (was Tux3 Report: How fast can we fsync?)
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 05:35:23 +0200
Message-ID: <1430364923.3180.6.camel@gmail.com>
References: <8f886f13-6550-4322-95be-93244ae61045@phunq.net>
	 <1430274071.3363.4.camel@gmail.com>
	 <1906f271-aa23-404b-9776-a4e2bce0c6aa@phunq.net>
	 <1430289213.3693.3.camel@gmail.com>
	 <b10acd39-85d6-44f8-bbad-ac393bd8504e@phunq.net>
	 <1430325763.19371.41.camel@gmail.com> <1430334326.7360.25.camel@gmail.com>
	 <20150430002008.GY15810@dastard>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Daniel Phillips <daniel@phunq.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, tux3@tux3.org,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-wg0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]:36596 "EHLO
	mail-wg0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751941AbbD3Df0 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 29 Apr 2015 23:35:26 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20150430002008.GY15810@dastard>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 10:20 +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:

> IOWS, XFS just hates your disk. Spend $50 and buy a cheap SSD and
> the problem goes away. :)

I'd love to.  Too bad sorry sack of sh*t MB manufacturer only applied
_connectors_ to 4 of 6 available ports, and they're all in use :)

> ----
> 
> And now in more detail.

Thanks for those details, made perfect sense.

	-Mike