linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz,
	richard.weinberger@gmail.com
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 23/35] ubifs: set/clear MS_RDONLY properly in ubifs_remount
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:26:55 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1440401215.15510.35.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55DAC3C3.9050906@cn.fujitsu.com>

On Mon, 2015-08-24 at 15:12 +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
> On 08/24/2015 03:02 PM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-08-24 at 09:29 +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
> > > On 08/10/2015 10:46 AM, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
> > > > On 08/09/2015 05:17 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > > > > Am 30.07.2015 um 07:48 schrieb Dongsheng Yang:
> > > > > > We need to set or clear MS_RDONLY in remounting.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Care to explain why?
> > > > > Does the quota subsystem need that information?
> > > > > If so, where?
> > > > 
> > > > Ha, yes, you are right.
> > > > 
> > > > When we remount to rw from ro, we need to call dquot_resume.
> > > > And dquot_resume will call vfs_load_quota_inode() which
> > > > will check the MS_RDONLY. If it's ro mode, will return
> > > > an -EROFS.
> > > > 
> > > > And I know that we are using ->ro_mount in ubifs
> > > > to store the mounted mode. So we don't care about
> > > > the MS_RDONLY in ubifs. But why not to tell vfs we are in
> > > > ro or rw? Does it cause any problem?
> > > 
> > > Hi Artem,
> > > 	I found there is a commit 2ef13294d to introduce
> > > ro_mount to ubifs. Yes, I see the reason to use ro_mount
> > > rather than MS_RDONLY in ubifs. But why we do not set
> > > MS_RDONLY to tell vfs it's in rdonly or not? Current
> > > quota depends on it. Does this patch cause some problem?
> > 
> > MS_RDONLY is set at mount time, then it can be changed when we re
> > -mount, and then UBIFS can change it when there was a critical
> > error,
> > to ask VFS to stop writing more data to the file-system. See
> > 'ubifs_ro_mode()'.
> > 
> > The custom ro_mount is the same as MS_RDONLY, but it does not
> > change in
> > 'ubifs_ro_mode()'. It preserves the last mount state before the
> > error
> > happened - was it R/O or R/W.
> > 
> > Why is this needed?
> > 
> > UBIFS allocate different amount of resources depending on whether
> > we
> > are R/O or R/W. We use less memory in R/O mode, for example.
> > 
> > At unmount time, we need to know whether we allocated the "RW"
> > amount
> > of resources or the "RO" amount of resources.
> > 
> > We cannot use the MS_RDONLY flag to detect that, because it is
> > changed
> > in 'ubifs_ro_mode()' unconditionally, so we lose the information.
> > Therefore we use the custom ro_mount flag - it tells us how we were
> > mounted, so we know how much resources to free.
> 
> Great explanation!!! This makes it much more clear to me.
> 
> But about:
>  > MS_RDONLY is set at mount time, then it can be changed when we re
> 
> Currently, ubifs did not set it at mount time and ubifs did not
> change
> it in re-mounting. So vfs don't know the R/O or R/W mode of ubifs.

Well, sounds like a bug. Either we missed that, or VFS used to set it,
and now does not. In either case, IIUC, the MS_RDONLY flag should be
set on remount and reflect the mount state. Please, verify /proc/mounts
after RO<->RW remounts - we must make sure mount options are correct
there. You can cook a patch and send it. Do not forget to add the
stable tag then.

Artem.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-24  7:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-30  5:47 [PATCH v2 00/35] Add quota supporting in ubifs Dongsheng Yang
2015-07-30  5:47 ` [PATCH v2 01/35] fs: introduce a ->s_cdev field into struct super_block Dongsheng Yang
2015-07-30  5:47 ` [PATCH v2 02/35] fs: cleanup: remove the blank line before EXPORT_SYMBOL Dongsheng Yang
2015-07-30  5:47 ` [PATCH v2 03/35] fs: super: cleanup: make the comment of each function aligned Dongsheng Yang
2015-07-30  5:48 ` [PATCH v2 04/35] fs: super: consolidate the get_super class functions Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-03 19:50   ` Jan Kara
2015-07-30  5:48 ` [PATCH v2 05/35] fs: super: introduce a get_super_cdev to get super by a cdev reference Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-03 19:51   ` Jan Kara
2015-07-30  5:48 ` [PATCH v2 06/35] fs: super: introduce a get_super_cdev_thawed to get sb by " Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-03 19:56   ` Jan Kara
2015-07-30  5:48 ` [PATCH v2 07/35] fs: char_dev: introduce cd_acquire function to acquire cdev Dongsheng Yang
2015-07-30  5:48 ` [PATCH v2 08/35] fs: introduce a __lookup_dev for internal using Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-03 20:08   ` Jan Kara
2015-08-03 20:13     ` Jan Kara
2015-07-30  5:48 ` [PATCH v2 09/35] fs: char_dev: introduce lookup_cdev to get cdev by pathname Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-03 20:08   ` Jan Kara
2015-07-30  5:48 ` [PATCH v2 10/35] fs: dquot: skip invalidate_bdev if bdev is NULL Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-03 20:04   ` Jan Kara
2015-07-30  5:48 ` [PATCH v2 11/35] fs: quota: make quota support fs which is running on char dev Dongsheng Yang
2015-07-30  5:48 ` [PATCH v2 12/35] ubi: introduce a interface to get cdev in ubi_volume Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-03 20:56   ` Richard Weinberger
2015-07-30  5:48 ` [PATCH v2 13/35] ubifs: fix a typo in comment of ubifs_budget_req Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-03 20:56   ` Richard Weinberger
2015-08-10  8:21   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2015-07-30  5:48 ` [PATCH v2 14/35] ubifs: extend budget for blocks Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-03 20:56   ` Richard Weinberger
2015-08-21  5:59     ` Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-21  7:12       ` Richard Weinberger
2015-08-21  7:55         ` Dongsheng Yang
2015-07-30  5:48 ` [PATCH v2 15/35] ubifs: fill sb->s_cdev in ubifs_fill_super() Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-03 20:58   ` Richard Weinberger
2015-07-30  5:48 ` [PATCH v2 16/35] ubifs: fill ->s_dev in ubifs_fill_super Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-03 21:00   ` Richard Weinberger
2015-07-30  5:48 ` [PATCH v2 17/35] ubifs: export read_block() from file.c Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-03 21:13   ` Richard Weinberger
2015-08-03 21:29     ` Richard Weinberger
2015-08-07  3:15       ` Dongsheng Yang
2015-07-30  5:48 ` [PATCH v2 18/35] ubifs: introduce quota related mount options Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-03 21:13   ` Richard Weinberger
2015-08-07  3:17     ` Dongsheng Yang
2015-07-30  5:48 ` [PATCH v2 19/35] ubifs: budget for inode in ubifs_dirty_inode if necessary Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-03 21:13   ` Richard Weinberger
2015-08-07  3:18     ` Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-05  8:11   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2015-08-06  6:46     ` Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-06  7:26       ` Artem Bityutskiy
2015-08-06  7:30         ` Dongsheng Yang
2015-07-30  5:48 ` [PATCH v2 20/35] ubifs: implement IO functions for quota files Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-03 21:46   ` Richard Weinberger
2015-08-05  1:21     ` Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-07  3:24     ` Dongsheng Yang
2015-07-30  5:48 ` [PATCH v2 21/35] ubifs: disable quota in ubifs_put_super Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-08 21:08   ` Richard Weinberger
2015-08-10  2:03     ` Dongsheng Yang
2015-07-30  5:48 ` [PATCH v2 22/35] ubifs: write quota back in ubifs_sync Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-08 21:17   ` Richard Weinberger
2015-07-30  5:48 ` [PATCH v2 23/35] ubifs: set/clear MS_RDONLY properly in ubifs_remount Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-08 21:17   ` Richard Weinberger
2015-08-10  2:46     ` Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-24  1:29       ` Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-24  7:02         ` Artem Bityutskiy
2015-08-24  7:12           ` Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-24  7:26             ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2015-08-27  2:52               ` Dongsheng Yang
2015-07-30  5:48 ` [PATCH v2 24/35] ubifs: suspend & resume quota " Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-08 21:24   ` Richard Weinberger
2015-08-10  2:04     ` Dongsheng Yang
2015-07-30  5:48 ` [PATCH v2 25/35] ubifs: record quota information about inode in ubifs_new_inode Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-08 21:43   ` Richard Weinberger
2015-08-10  2:13     ` Dongsheng Yang
2015-07-30  5:48 ` [PATCH v2 26/35] ubifs: free quota inode information in ubifs_evict_inode Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-08 21:51   ` Richard Weinberger
2015-08-10  3:09     ` Dongsheng Yang
2015-07-30  5:48 ` [PATCH v2 27/35] ubifs: alloc quota space in ubifs_write_begin Dongsheng Yang
2015-07-30  5:48 ` [PATCH v2 28/35] ubifs: free quota space in do_truncation Dongsheng Yang
2015-07-30  5:48 ` [PATCH v2 29/35] ubifs: free quota space when deleting a file Dongsheng Yang
2015-07-30  5:48 ` [PATCH v2 30/35] ubifs: adapt quota space informatin in do_setattr Dongsheng Yang
2015-07-30  5:48 ` [PATCH v2 31/35] ubifs: transfer quota information in changing owner or group Dongsheng Yang
2015-07-30  5:48 ` [PATCH v2 32/35] ubifs: write inode in ubifs_quota_write if we are appending Dongsheng Yang
2015-07-30  5:48 ` [PATCH v2 33/35] fs: introduce a get_qsize() to file_operations Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-03 20:15   ` Jan Kara
2015-08-07  3:30     ` Dongsheng Yang
2015-07-30  5:48 ` [PATCH v2 34/35] ubifs: implement ubifs_get_qsize to get quota size in ubifs Dongsheng Yang
2015-07-30  5:48 ` [PATCH v2 35/35] ubifs: make ubifs to support quota Dongsheng Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1440401215.15510.35.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=richard.weinberger@gmail.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).