From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Artem Bityutskiy Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ubifs: Allow O_DIRECT Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 18:48:56 +0300 Message-ID: <1440517736.15510.81.camel@gmail.com> References: <1440016553-26481-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <1440016553-26481-2-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <55D542C5.6040500@cn.fujitsu.com> <1440070300.31419.202.camel@gmail.com> <55D5BC92.8050903@nod.at> <20150820204933.GG74600@google.com> <1440400405.15510.29.camel@gmail.com> <20150824161837.GA28975@localhost> <20150824234611.GV3902@dastard> <20150825012831.GC7176@ret.masoncoding.com> Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jeff Moyer , Brian Norris , Richard Weinberger , Dongsheng Yang , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Chris Mason , Dave Chinner Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150825012831.GC7176@ret.masoncoding.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2015-08-24 at 21:28 -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > This is what btrfs already does for O_DIRECT plus compressed, or > other > cases where people don't want their applications to break on top of > new > features that aren't quite compatible with it. I do not know how much of direct IO we can do in UBIFS - we have compression too, there is not block layer under us. But someone should try and see what could be done. Artem.