From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Boaz Harrosh <boaz@plexistor.com>,
Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>,
lsf-pc@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM ATTEND] block: multipage bvecs
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 08:01:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1456675282.2324.2.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56D2D757.2000204@plexistor.com>
On Sun, 2016-02-28 at 13:17 +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On 02/26/2016 06:33 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to participate in LSF/MM and discuss multipage bvecs.
> >
> > Kent posted the idea[1] before, but never pushed out.
> > I have studied multipage bvecs for a while, and think
> > it is a good idea to improve block subsystem.
> >
> > Multipage bvecs means that one 'struct bio_bvec' can hold
> > multiple pages which are physically contiguous instead
> > of one single page used in current kernel.
> >
>
> Hi Ming Lei
>
> This is an interesting talk for me.
>
> I don't know if you ever tried it but I did. If I take a regular
> SSD disk or a PCIE flash card that I have in my machine and
> I stick a pointer to a page and bv_len = PAGE_SIZE * 8 and call
> submit_bio, I get 8 pages worth of IO with a single bvec and it
> all just works.
No it wouldn't. There's no check anywhere that a single bv entry is
under the queue max segment size because the assumption is bv_len <=
page size. If you start sending multi-page single bio vec entries,
you'll violate those assumptions and eventually get an unmappable bio.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-28 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-26 16:33 [LSF/MM ATTEND] block: multipage bvecs Ming Lei
2016-02-28 11:17 ` Boaz Harrosh
2016-02-28 14:34 ` Ming Lei
2016-02-28 14:41 ` Ming Lei
2016-02-28 16:01 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2016-02-29 9:41 ` [Lsf-pc] " Boaz Harrosh
2016-02-28 16:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-29 10:16 ` Boaz Harrosh
2016-02-29 15:46 ` James Bottomley
2016-02-28 16:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-28 16:26 ` James Bottomley
2016-02-28 16:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-28 16:45 ` James Bottomley
2016-02-28 16:59 ` Ming Lei
2016-02-28 17:09 ` James Bottomley
2016-02-28 18:49 ` Ming Lei
2016-03-03 8:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-03-03 11:04 ` Ming Lei
2016-03-03 12:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-03-03 23:49 ` Ming Lin
2016-03-07 8:44 ` Ming Lei
2016-03-21 15:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-03-22 0:12 ` Ming Lei
2016-03-05 8:35 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1456675282.2324.2.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=boaz@plexistor.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lsf-pc@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).