From: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>,
Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>,
Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com (supporter:XFS FILESYSTEM),
cluster-devel@redhat.com (open list:GFS2 FILE SYSTEM),
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH] fs: return EPERM on immutable inode
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 21:28:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1459862890-22957-1-git-send-email-guaneryu@gmail.com> (raw)
In most cases, EPERM is returned on immutable inode, and there're only
a few places returning EACCES. And EPERM looks more reasonable to me.
So converting all EACCES to EPERM on immutable inode.
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
---
I noticed this when running LTP on overlayfs, setxattr03 failed due to
unexpected EACCES on immutable inode.
fs/gfs2/inode.c | 2 +-
fs/namei.c | 2 +-
fs/utimes.c | 3 ++-
fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/inode.c b/fs/gfs2/inode.c
index bb30f9a..4c68d91 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/inode.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/inode.c
@@ -1757,7 +1757,7 @@ int gfs2_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask)
}
if ((mask & MAY_WRITE) && IS_IMMUTABLE(inode))
- error = -EACCES;
+ error = -EPERM;
else
error = generic_permission(inode, mask);
if (unlock)
diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
index 1d9ca2d..7f4a40a 100644
--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ int __inode_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask)
* Nobody gets write access to an immutable file.
*/
if (IS_IMMUTABLE(inode))
- return -EACCES;
+ return -EPERM;
}
retval = do_inode_permission(inode, mask);
diff --git a/fs/utimes.c b/fs/utimes.c
index 85c40f4..794f5f5 100644
--- a/fs/utimes.c
+++ b/fs/utimes.c
@@ -92,10 +92,11 @@ static int utimes_common(struct path *path, struct timespec *times)
* then we need to check permissions, because
* inode_change_ok() won't do it.
*/
- error = -EACCES;
+ error = -EPERM;
if (IS_IMMUTABLE(inode))
goto mnt_drop_write_and_out;
+ error = -EACCES;
if (!inode_owner_or_capable(inode)) {
error = inode_permission(inode, MAY_WRITE);
if (error)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
index bcb6c19..4c4c58f 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ xfs_open_by_handle(
}
if ((fmode & FMODE_WRITE) && IS_IMMUTABLE(inode)) {
- error = -EACCES;
+ error = -EPERM;
goto out_dput;
}
--
2.5.5
next reply other threads:[~2016-04-05 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-05 13:28 Eryu Guan [this message]
2016-04-05 20:44 ` [PATCH] fs: return EPERM on immutable inode Dave Chinner
2016-04-06 3:44 ` [PATCH v2] " Eryu Guan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1459862890-22957-1-git-send-email-guaneryu@gmail.com \
--to=guaneryu@gmail.com \
--cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rpeterso@redhat.com \
--cc=swhiteho@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).