From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
To: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: "tytso@mit.edu" <tytso@mit.edu>,
"linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org>,
"david@fromorbit.com" <david@fromorbit.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Parrish, Micah (HP Servers Linux R&D)" <micah.parrish@hpe.com>,
"adilger.kernel@dilger.ca" <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ext4: Add alignment check for DAX mount
Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 09:42:23 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1462376543.27137.71.camel@hpe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1462290096.27137.47.camel@hpe.com>
On Tue, 2016-05-03 at 15:41 +0000, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-05-03 at 08:43 -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 11:00:21AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > On Tue 03-05-16 01:44:10, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Please come up with a version that doesn't require tons of
> > > > boilerplate code in every file system.
> > >
> > > Well, I was thinking about some helper as well but we could save ~4
> > > lines with that and that didn't seem significant to me. Most of the
> > > lines is actually reporting appropriate mount error in dmesg and that
> > > is fs-dependent so it needs to stay in the filesystem... So what do
> > > you have in mind?
> >
> > I guess if you wanted to reduce the code needed in each filesystem, you
> > could avoid having different error messages for each of the failure
> > conditions, and just print the error value. All the error cases caught
> > by the current code are unique, so we aren't losing any
> > information. The resulting patch for ext4 would look like this:
>
> I'd prefer to keep the "error: device does not support dax" and "error:
> unaligned partition for dax" messages since they clarify the problem as a
> user error. The former case is especially common with BTT. The "error:
> dax access failed (%d)" message is helpful when we need to look into the
> case.
>
> If XFS is OK to use the messages similar to ext2/4, then we can do:
>
> * Add a new helper function, say bdev_check_dax_mount(), which logs
> common error messages with pr_err(), such as:
> "VFS (pmem0): error: device does not support dax"
> * When bdev_check_dax_mount() returns with a negative value:
> - XFS logs an additional message below via xfs_alert() and proceeds
> without dax option.
> "XFS (pmem0): Turning DAX off."
> - ext2/4 fails the mount.
Since v2 got multiple reviews, and Jan has added 2/3 into his tree
(thanks!), I will send "[PATCH v2-UPDATE 3/3]" which addresses Ross's
comments on v2 patch 3/3. This keeps the v2 series.
Christoph, let me know if you'd still like to see v3 with the above changes
to share the same error messages among ext2/4 and xfs.
Thanks,
-Toshi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-04 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-02 18:42 [PATCH v2 0/3] Add alignment check for DAX mount Toshi Kani
2016-05-02 18:42 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] ext4: " Toshi Kani
2016-05-03 7:58 ` Jan Kara
2016-05-03 8:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-03 9:00 ` Jan Kara
2016-05-03 14:43 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-05-03 15:41 ` Toshi Kani
2016-05-04 15:42 ` Toshi Kani [this message]
2016-05-02 18:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ext2: " Toshi Kani
2016-05-03 8:01 ` Jan Kara
2016-05-02 18:42 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] xfs: " Toshi Kani
2016-05-02 19:50 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-05-02 19:54 ` Toshi Kani
2016-05-04 23:18 ` Dave Chinner
2016-05-04 23:41 ` Toshi Kani
2016-05-05 8:03 ` Jan Kara
2016-05-02 19:20 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] " Boaz Harrosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1462376543.27137.71.camel@hpe.com \
--to=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org \
--cc=micah.parrish@hpe.com \
--cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).