From: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>,
Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] nfs: Fix spurios EPERM when mkdir of existing dentry
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 01:53:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1467870827-2959489-2-git-send-email-green@linuxhacker.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1467870827-2959489-1-git-send-email-green@linuxhacker.ru>
It's great when we can shave an extra RPC, but not at the expense
of correctness.
We should not return EPERM (from vfs_create/mknod/mkdir) if the
name already exists, even if we have no write access in parent.
Since the check in nfs_permission is clearly not enough to stave
off this, just throw in the extra READ access to actually
go through.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
---
fs/nfs/dir.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/dir.c b/fs/nfs/dir.c
index d8015a0..8c7835b 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/dir.c
@@ -1383,8 +1383,10 @@ struct dentry *nfs_lookup(struct inode *dir, struct dentry * dentry, unsigned in
/*
* If we're doing an exclusive create, optimize away the lookup
* but don't hash the dentry.
+ * This optimization only works if we can write in the parent.
*/
- if (nfs_is_exclusive_create(dir, flags))
+ if (nfs_is_exclusive_create(dir, flags) &&
+ (inode_permission(dir, MAY_WRITE | MAY_READ | MAY_EXEC) == 0))
return NULL;
res = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-07 5:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-07 5:53 [RFC] [PATCH 0/2] mkdir lookup optimization Oleg Drokin
2016-07-07 5:53 ` Oleg Drokin [this message]
2016-07-07 16:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] nfs: Fix spurios EPERM when mkdir of existing dentry Trond Myklebust
2016-07-07 16:52 ` Oleg Drokin
2016-07-07 16:59 ` Trond Myklebust
2016-07-07 17:07 ` Oleg Drokin
2016-07-07 17:27 ` Trond Myklebust
2016-07-07 17:32 ` Oleg Drokin
2016-07-07 21:52 ` Oleg Drokin
2016-07-07 23:17 ` Trond Myklebust
2016-07-07 5:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] staging/lustre: Prevent spurious EPERM on mkdir Oleg Drokin
2016-07-07 10:53 ` [RFC] [PATCH 0/2] mkdir lookup optimization Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1467870827-2959489-2-git-send-email-green@linuxhacker.ru \
--to=green@linuxhacker.ru \
--cc=jlayton@poochiereds.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).