From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>,
Yuriy Kolerov <Yuriy.Kolerov@synopsys.com>
Subject: Re: [glibc PATCH] fcntl: put F_OFD_* constants under #ifdef __USE_FILE_OFFSET64
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 13:49:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1471456198.3196.43.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1608171540190.7156@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 15:44 +0000, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Aug 2016, Jeff Layton wrote:
>
> >
> > +# if __WORDSIZE != 32 || defined __USE_FILE_OFFSET64
>
> Are you sure __WORDSIZE is always defined here? I don't see an include of
> <bits/wordsize.h> in this header.
>
> Are you sure __WORDSIZE != 32 is the right condition on all architectures
> for the flock and flock64 structures being the same? Wordsize is not a
> particularly well-defined concept all cases. More specific tests tend to
> be preferred, e.g. __OFF_T_MATCHES_OFF64_T in bits/typesizes.h (so this
> would indicate having a new macro __FLOCK_MATCHES_FLOCK64 and arranging
> for it to be defined to 1 or 0 correctly in all cases - or at least a
> careful analysis of all architectures using this file to show that some
> other conditional is always correct).
>
Ok, that makes sense -- thanks.
The only difference between struct flock and flock64 is the size of the
offset values. So, I think that __OFF_T_MATCHES_OFF64_T would suffice
here, actually. Is there any reason to do anything more elaborate than
this in place of what I proposed earlier?
#if defined __OFF_T_MATCHES_OFF64_T || defined __USE_FILE_OFFSET64
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-17 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-17 14:47 [glibc PATCH] fcntl: put F_OFD_* constants under #ifdef __USE_FILE_OFFSET64 Jeff Layton
2016-08-17 15:44 ` Joseph Myers
2016-08-17 17:49 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2016-08-17 17:56 ` Joseph Myers
2016-08-17 18:23 ` Jeff Layton
2016-08-17 16:13 ` Mike Frysinger
2016-08-17 17:34 ` Florian Weimer
2016-08-17 17:39 ` Jeff Layton
2016-08-17 18:02 ` Florian Weimer
2016-08-17 18:21 ` Jeff Layton
2016-08-17 18:51 ` Florian Weimer
2016-08-17 19:20 ` Jeff Layton
2016-08-18 8:44 ` Florian Weimer
2016-08-18 8:58 ` Andreas Schwab
2016-08-17 20:52 ` Andreas Schwab
2016-08-18 8:45 ` Florian Weimer
2016-08-17 18:43 ` Mike Frysinger
2016-08-17 19:15 ` Jeff Layton
2016-08-17 19:59 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-08-17 20:05 ` Jeff Layton
2016-08-17 20:37 ` Mike Frysinger
2016-08-17 20:57 ` Jeff Layton
2016-08-17 21:35 ` Mike Frysinger
2016-08-17 21:48 ` Jeff Layton
2016-08-18 9:00 ` Florian Weimer
2016-08-23 11:03 ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-08-23 11:36 ` Jeff Layton
2016-08-23 11:38 ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-08-23 21:10 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-11-14 13:45 ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-11-22 18:41 ` Florian Weimer
2016-08-18 8:57 ` Florian Weimer
2016-08-17 20:03 ` Mike Frysinger
2016-08-17 21:30 ` Cyril Hrubis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1471456198.3196.43.camel@redhat.com \
--to=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=Yuriy.Kolerov@synopsys.com \
--cc=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).