From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.134]:64395 "EHLO
        mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751093AbcKFU3T (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Sun, 6 Nov 2016 15:29:19 -0500
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
        Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        y2038 Mailman List <y2038@lists.linaro.org>,
        linux-afs@lists.infradead.org,
        Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
        linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/6] vfs: Add timestamp range check support
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2016 21:28:37 +0100
Message-ID: <147897712.8Iuj6e9dPp@wuerfel>
In-Reply-To: <CABeXuvoCANJohBWy4mpJFiYvJj0XNHKVpW1RWhXVrd9ZjT5FSQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1478099096-25637-1-git-send-email-deepa.kernel@gmail.com> <1206C36E-9CB4-47B3-A891-8EA94C3220E0@dilger.ca> <CABeXuvoCANJohBWy4mpJFiYvJj0XNHKVpW1RWhXVrd9ZjT5FSQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Sunday, November 6, 2016 9:44:33 AM CET Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> I will post xfs tests that validate mount and range checking.
> I will keep the policy same as what the RFC suggests for now.
> 
> Clamping can be verified once vfs is transitioned to using time64_t.

Won't it already work as expected on 64-bit architectures as they
have a 64-bit time_t?

	Arnd