linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: xfs:  commit 6552321831dc "xfs: remove i_iolock and use    i_rwsem in the VFS inode instead"  change causes hang
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2017 10:31:22 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1483889482.8189.104.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170108151430.GA29847@lst.de>

On Sun, 2017-01-08 at 16:14 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 10:03:09AM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > But not normally for a normal file read.
> 
> Depends on the file system.  In addition to XFS at least the NFS
> also uses i_rwsem by default.  Also all file systems supporting
> a DAX I/O path.

We're only interested in the integrity of the local file system.

> > Unless something has changed recently, to synchronize reading files to
> > calculate the file hash and writing xattrs it has to take the i_rwsem
> > prior to reading the file.
> 
> No, you must simply not do this at all.  If you take a lock that
> belongs to the fs and is not your own over ->read_iter you're toast
> as you've seen.

Christoph,  this isn't a new story and telling me this isn't very
productive.  Originally there was an IMA specific lock.  The i_mutex was
taken just to access the xattr.   Unforutnately, having two locks caused
a lockdep between the normal read/validate and setxattr.  As a result,
we dropped the IMA specific lock.

IMA needs a mechanism for quickly reading a file to calculate the file
hash and validate (or set) the file signature/hash stored as an xattr,
prior to any other process getting access to the file.

Mimi


  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-08 15:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-08 14:48 xfs: commit 6552321831dc "xfs: remove i_iolock and use i_rwsem in the VFS inode instead" change causes hang Mimi Zohar
2017-01-08 14:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-08 15:03   ` Mimi Zohar
2017-01-08 15:14     ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-08 15:31       ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2017-01-08 15:37         ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-08 16:38           ` Mimi Zohar
2017-01-08 16:43             ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-08 17:59   ` James Bottomley
2017-01-08 18:18     ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-08 18:57       ` James Bottomley
2017-01-08 19:09         ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-08 19:26           ` Al Viro
2017-01-08 20:10             ` Mimi Zohar
2017-01-08 19:39           ` Mimi Zohar
2017-01-09 19:44           ` Jeff Layton
2017-01-10  2:54             ` Mimi Zohar
2017-01-10 16:22               ` Jeff Layton
2017-01-08 19:16         ` Mimi Zohar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1483889482.8189.104.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).