From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: xfs: commit 6552321831dc "xfs: remove i_iolock and use i_rwsem in the VFS inode instead" change causes hang
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2017 10:31:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1483889482.8189.104.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170108151430.GA29847@lst.de>
On Sun, 2017-01-08 at 16:14 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 10:03:09AM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > But not normally for a normal file read.
>
> Depends on the file system. In addition to XFS at least the NFS
> also uses i_rwsem by default. Also all file systems supporting
> a DAX I/O path.
We're only interested in the integrity of the local file system.
> > Unless something has changed recently, to synchronize reading files to
> > calculate the file hash and writing xattrs it has to take the i_rwsem
> > prior to reading the file.
>
> No, you must simply not do this at all. If you take a lock that
> belongs to the fs and is not your own over ->read_iter you're toast
> as you've seen.
Christoph, this isn't a new story and telling me this isn't very
productive. Originally there was an IMA specific lock. The i_mutex was
taken just to access the xattr. Unforutnately, having two locks caused
a lockdep between the normal read/validate and setxattr. As a result,
we dropped the IMA specific lock.
IMA needs a mechanism for quickly reading a file to calculate the file
hash and validate (or set) the file signature/hash stored as an xattr,
prior to any other process getting access to the file.
Mimi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-08 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-08 14:48 xfs: commit 6552321831dc "xfs: remove i_iolock and use i_rwsem in the VFS inode instead" change causes hang Mimi Zohar
2017-01-08 14:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-08 15:03 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-01-08 15:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-08 15:31 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2017-01-08 15:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-08 16:38 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-01-08 16:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-08 17:59 ` James Bottomley
2017-01-08 18:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-08 18:57 ` James Bottomley
2017-01-08 19:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-08 19:26 ` Al Viro
2017-01-08 20:10 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-01-08 19:39 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-01-09 19:44 ` Jeff Layton
2017-01-10 2:54 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-01-10 16:22 ` Jeff Layton
2017-01-08 19:16 ` Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1483889482.8189.104.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).