From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM ATTEND] FS jitter testing, network caching, Lustre, cluster filesystems.
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:21:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1484590862.2540.51.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F7FABA22-8B7D-4C77-A360-4454A5571C8F@linuxhacker.ru>
On Mon, 2017-01-16 at 13:02 -0500, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> On Jan 16, 2017, at 12:32 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2017-01-15 at 18:38 -0500, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> > > A container support from filesystems is also very relevant to
> > > us
> > > since Lustre is used more and more in such settings.
> >
> > I've added the containers ML to the cc just in case. Can you add
> > more
> > colour to this, please? What container support for filesystems do
> > you
> > think we need beyond the user namespace in the superblock?
>
> Namespace access is necessary, we might need it before the superblock
> is there too (say during mount we might need kerberos credentials
> fetched to properly authenticate this mount instance to the server).
The superblock namespace is mostly for uid/gid changes across the
kernel <-> filesystem boundary.
The actual container namespaces will already be set up by the time the
mount is done (assuming mount within a container), so you have them all
present. Usually you get the information for credentials from a
combination of the UTS namespace (host/domain name) and the mount
namespace (credentials provisioned to container filesystem).
Perhaps if you described the actual problem you're seeing rather than
try to relate it to what I said about superblock namespace (which is
probably irrelevant), we could figure out what the issue is.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-16 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-15 23:38 [LSF/MM ATTEND] FS jitter testing, network caching, Lustre, cluster filesystems Oleg Drokin
2017-01-16 17:17 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-01-16 17:23 ` Jeffrey Altman
2017-01-16 17:42 ` Chuck Lever
2017-01-16 17:46 ` James Bottomley
2017-01-16 20:39 ` Authentication Contexts for network file systems and Containers was " Jeffrey Altman
2017-01-16 21:03 ` [Lsf-pc] " James Bottomley
2017-01-17 16:29 ` Jeffrey Altman
2017-01-17 16:34 ` Trond Myklebust
2017-01-17 17:10 ` Jeffrey Altman
2017-01-16 17:32 ` [Lsf-pc] " James Bottomley
2017-01-16 18:02 ` Oleg Drokin
2017-01-16 18:21 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2017-01-16 18:39 ` Oleg Drokin
2017-01-16 20:58 ` James Bottomley
2017-01-17 7:00 ` Oleg Drokin
2017-01-17 14:26 ` James Bottomley
2017-01-17 17:41 ` Oleg Drokin
2017-01-17 14:56 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1484590862.2540.51.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=green@linuxhacker.ru \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).