From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
"David Howells" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
"Serge Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
"John Johansen" <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
"Casey Schaufler" <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
"Alexander Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@kernel.org>,
"Ben Hutchings" <ben@decadent.org.uk>,
"Hugh Dickins" <hughd@google.com>,
"Oleg Nesterov" <oleg@redhat.com>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
"Rik van Riel" <riel@redhat.com>,
"James Morris" <james.l.morris@oracle.com>,
"Greg Ungerer" <gerg@linux-m68k.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Nicolas Pitre" <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
"Stephen Smalley" <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
"Paul Moore" <paul@paul-moore.com>,
"Vivek Goyal" <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
"Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
"Tetsuo Handa" <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/8] exec: Use secureexec for clearing pdeath_signal
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 00:57:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1499673451-66160-5-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1499673451-66160-1-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org>
Like dumpability, clearing pdeath_signal happens both in setup_new_exec()
and later in commit_creds(). The test in setup_new_exec() is different
from all other privilege comparisons, though: it is checking the new cred
(bprm) uid vs the old cred (current) euid. This appears to be a bug,
introduced by commit a6f76f23d297 ("CRED: Make execve() take advantage of
copy-on-write credentials"):
- if (bprm->e_uid != current_euid() ||
- bprm->e_gid != current_egid()) {
- set_dumpable(current->mm, suid_dumpable);
+ /* install the new credentials */
+ if (bprm->cred->uid != current_euid() ||
+ bprm->cred->gid != current_egid()) {
It was bprm euid vs current euid (and egids), but the effective got
dropped. Nothing in the exec flow changes bprm->cred->uid (nor gid).
The call traces are:
prepare_bprm_creds()
prepare_exec_creds()
prepare_creds()
memcpy(new_creds, old_creds, ...)
security_prepare_creds() (unimplemented by commoncap)
...
prepare_binprm()
bprm_fill_uid()
resets euid/egid to current euid/egid
sets euid/egid on bprm based on set*id file bits
security_bprm_set_creds()
cap_bprm_set_creds()
handle all caps-based manipulations
so this test is effectively a test of current_uid() vs current_euid(),
which is wrong, just like the prior dumpability tests were wrong.
The commit log says "Clear pdeath_signal and set dumpable on
certain circumstances that may not be covered by commit_creds()." This
may be meaning the earlier old euid vs new euid (and egid) test that
got changed.
Luckily, as with dumpability, this is all masked by commit_creds()
which performs old/new euid and egid tests and clears pdeath_signal.
And again, like dumpability, we should include LSM secureexec logic for
pdeath_signal clearing. For example, Smack goes out of its way to clear
pdeath_signal when it finds a secureexec condition.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
---
fs/exec.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index 3e519d4f0bd3..d7bda5b60e7b 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1361,8 +1361,7 @@ void setup_new_exec(struct linux_binprm * bprm)
*/
current->mm->task_size = TASK_SIZE;
- if (!uid_eq(bprm->cred->uid, current_euid()) ||
- !gid_eq(bprm->cred->gid, current_egid())) {
+ if (bprm->secureexec) {
current->pdeath_signal = 0;
} else {
if (bprm->interp_flags & BINPRM_FLAGS_ENFORCE_NONDUMP)
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-10 7:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-10 7:57 [PATCH v2 0/8] exec: Use sane stack rlimit under secureexec Kees Cook
2017-07-10 7:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] exec: Correct comments about "point of no return" Kees Cook
2017-07-10 8:46 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-07-10 16:04 ` Kees Cook
[not found] ` <CAGXu5jKTaXLU+H6DnNuy6ggxcMDgo9G-wEmZ4RP=QneJaZuNDg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-10 17:07 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-07-18 6:39 ` Kees Cook
2017-07-18 13:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-07-18 13:42 ` Kees Cook
2017-07-10 7:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] exec: Move security_bprm_secureexec() earlier Kees Cook
2017-07-10 8:57 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-07-10 16:06 ` Kees Cook
[not found] ` <CAGXu5jLw6SsXM66x7ZHdj+Pb8Aepq7rHn1saNHRhq-wqk8p=4g-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-10 17:18 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-07-11 2:07 ` Kees Cook
2017-07-18 6:45 ` Kees Cook
2017-07-10 7:57 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] exec: Use secureexec for setting dumpability Kees Cook
2017-07-10 7:57 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2017-07-10 7:57 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] smack: Remove redundant pdeath_signal clearing Kees Cook
2017-07-10 7:57 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] exec: Consolidate dumpability logic Kees Cook
2017-07-10 7:57 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] exec: Consolidate pdeath_signal clearing Kees Cook
2017-07-10 7:57 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] exec: Use sane stack rlimit under secureexec Kees Cook
2017-07-10 14:08 ` Ben Hutchings
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1499673451-66160-5-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gerg@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=james.l.morris@oracle.com \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).