linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
To: "simon.buttgereit@tu-ilmenau.de" <simon.buttgereit@tu-ilmenau.de>
Cc: "idryomov@gmail.com" <idryomov@gmail.com>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Pavan Rallabhandi <Pavan.Rallabhandi@ibm.com>,
	Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
Subject: RE:  [PATCH] ceph: Fix log output race condition in osd client
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 17:55:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <14ae907a6fb3c59db957941b41691deb3a0ee7f1.camel@ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d86114929063d12dce4110c730df2afd2c17a551.camel@tu-ilmenau.de>

On Wed, 2025-09-24 at 15:57 +0200, Simon Buttgereit wrote:
> On Tue, 2025-09-23 at 17:27 +0000, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote:
> > On Tue, 2025-09-23 at 13:08 +0200, Simon Buttgereit wrote:
> > > OSD client logging has a problem in get_osd() and put_osd().
> > > For one logging output refcount_read() is called twice. If recount
> > > value changes between both calls logging output is not consistent.
> > > 
> > > This patch adds an additional variable to store the current
> > > refcount
> > > before using it in the logging macro.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Simon Buttgereit <simon.buttgereit@tu-ilmenau.de>
> > > ---
> > >  net/ceph/osd_client.c | 10 ++++++----
> > >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/net/ceph/osd_client.c b/net/ceph/osd_client.c
> > > index 6664ea73ccf8..b8d20ab1976e 100644
> > > --- a/net/ceph/osd_client.c
> > > +++ b/net/ceph/osd_client.c
> > > @@ -1280,8 +1280,9 @@ static struct ceph_osd *create_osd(struct
> > > ceph_osd_client *osdc, int onum)
> > >  static struct ceph_osd *get_osd(struct ceph_osd *osd)
> > >  {
> > >  	if (refcount_inc_not_zero(&osd->o_ref)) {
> > > -		dout("get_osd %p %d -> %d\n", osd,
> > > refcount_read(&osd->o_ref)-1,
> > > -		     refcount_read(&osd->o_ref));
> > > +		unsigned int refcount = refcount_read(&osd-
> > > > o_ref);
> > > +
> > > +		dout("get_osd %p %d -> %d\n", osd, refcount - 1,
> > > refcount);
> > 
> > Frankly speaking, I don't see the point in this change. First of all,
> > it's the
> > debug output and to be really precise could be not necessary here.
> > And it is
> > easy to make correct conclusion from the debug output about real
> > value of
> > refcount, even if value changes between both calls. Secondly, more
> > important,
> > currently we have  refcount_read() as part of dout() call. After this
> > change,
> > the refcount_read() will be called and assigned to refcount value,
> > even if we
> > don't need in debug output.
> > 
> > Are you sure that you can compile the driver without warnings if
> > CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG=n?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Slava.
> > 
> > >  		return osd;
> > >  	} else {
> > >  		dout("get_osd %p FAIL\n", osd);
> > > @@ -1291,8 +1292,9 @@ static struct ceph_osd *get_osd(struct
> > > ceph_osd *osd)
> > >  
> > >  static void put_osd(struct ceph_osd *osd)
> > >  {
> > > -	dout("put_osd %p %d -> %d\n", osd, refcount_read(&osd-
> > > > o_ref),
> > > -	     refcount_read(&osd->o_ref) - 1);
> > > +	unsigned int refcount = refcount_read(&osd->o_ref);
> > > +
> > > +	dout("put_osd %p %d -> %d\n", osd, refcount, refcount -
> > > 1);
> > >  	if (refcount_dec_and_test(&osd->o_ref)) {
> > >  		osd_cleanup(osd);
> > >  		kfree(osd);
> 
> Hi Slava,
> thank you for your quick answer.
> 
> I checked it again: I built the kernel with gcc 15.2.1 with -Werror and
> CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG=n and everything ran through fine without any
> errors.
> I guess because of the way no_printk(fmt, ...) is built.
> 
> And for sure, this is only debug output, but right now, there is a race
> condition, which I went into, and in my opinion this should be fixed.
> Another option, which would be completely fine for me, could be to
> remove one recount_read call. This would result in something like:
> 
> dout("get_osd %p; new refcount = %d\n", osd, refcount_read(&osd-
> > o_ref));
> 
> If you have another idea on how to handle this I'm open to your
> suggestions.
> 

Hi Simon,

I think that removing one refcount_read() call looks like more clean solution.
Likewise statement:

dout("put_osd %p %d -> %d\n", osd, refcount_read(&osd->o_ref),
refcount_read(&osd->o_ref) - 1);

smells really bad for my taste and it looks like the overkill anyway. :)

Thanks,
Slava.

      reply	other threads:[~2025-09-24 17:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-23 11:08 [PATCH] ceph: Fix log output race condition in osd client Simon Buttgereit
2025-09-23 17:27 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2025-09-24 13:57   ` Simon Buttgereit
2025-09-24 17:55     ` Viacheslav Dubeyko [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=14ae907a6fb3c59db957941b41691deb3a0ee7f1.camel@ibm.com \
    --to=slava.dubeyko@ibm.com \
    --cc=Pavan.Rallabhandi@ibm.com \
    --cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=simon.buttgereit@tu-ilmenau.de \
    --cc=xiubli@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).