From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 11/15] exec: Use secureexec for clearing pdeath_signal
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 16:51:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1501545093-56634-12-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1501545093-56634-1-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org>
Like dumpability, clearing pdeath_signal happens both in setup_new_exec()
and later in commit_creds(). The test in setup_new_exec() is different
from all other privilege comparisons, though: it is checking the new cred
(bprm) uid vs the old cred (current) euid. This appears to be a bug,
introduced by commit a6f76f23d297 ("CRED: Make execve() take advantage of
copy-on-write credentials"):
- if (bprm->e_uid != current_euid() ||
- bprm->e_gid != current_egid()) {
- set_dumpable(current->mm, suid_dumpable);
+ if (bprm->cred->uid != current_euid() ||
+ bprm->cred->gid != current_egid()) {
It was bprm euid vs current euid (and egids), but the effective got
dropped. Nothing in the exec flow changes bprm->cred->uid (nor gid).
The call traces are:
prepare_bprm_creds()
prepare_exec_creds()
prepare_creds()
memcpy(new_creds, old_creds, ...)
security_prepare_creds() (unimplemented by commoncap)
...
prepare_binprm()
bprm_fill_uid()
resets euid/egid to current euid/egid
sets euid/egid on bprm based on set*id file bits
security_bprm_set_creds()
cap_bprm_set_creds()
handle all caps-based manipulations
so this test is effectively a test of current_uid() vs current_euid(),
which is wrong, just like the prior dumpability tests were wrong.
The commit log says "Clear pdeath_signal and set dumpable on
certain circumstances that may not be covered by commit_creds()." This
may be meaning the earlier old euid vs new euid (and egid) test that
got changed.
Luckily, as with dumpability, this is all masked by commit_creds()
which performs old/new euid and egid tests and clears pdeath_signal.
And again, like dumpability, we should include LSM secureexec logic for
pdeath_signal clearing. For example, Smack goes out of its way to clear
pdeath_signal when it finds a secureexec condition.
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
---
fs/exec.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index f9997ea6414e..708a72f93320 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1348,8 +1348,7 @@ void setup_new_exec(struct linux_binprm * bprm)
*/
current->mm->task_size = TASK_SIZE;
- if (!uid_eq(bprm->cred->uid, current_euid()) ||
- !gid_eq(bprm->cred->gid, current_egid())) {
+ if (bprm->secureexec) {
current->pdeath_signal = 0;
} else {
if (bprm->interp_flags & BINPRM_FLAGS_ENFORCE_NONDUMP)
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-31 23:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-31 23:51 [PATCH v4 00/15] exec: Use sane stack rlimit under secureexec Kees Cook
2017-07-31 23:51 ` [PATCH v4 01/15] exec: Rename bprm->cred_prepared to called_set_creds Kees Cook
2017-07-31 23:51 ` [PATCH v4 02/15] exec: Correct comments about "point of no return" Kees Cook
2017-07-31 23:51 ` [PATCH v4 03/15] binfmt: Introduce secureexec flag Kees Cook
2017-08-01 0:23 ` Kees Cook
2017-08-01 0:44 ` James Morris
2017-07-31 23:51 ` [PATCH v4 04/15] apparmor: Refactor to remove bprm_secureexec hook Kees Cook
2017-07-31 23:51 ` [PATCH v4 05/15] selinux: " Kees Cook
2017-08-01 0:45 ` James Morris
2017-08-01 13:24 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-07-31 23:51 ` [PATCH v4 06/15] smack: " Kees Cook
2017-08-01 0:46 ` James Morris
2017-08-01 15:24 ` Casey Schaufler
2017-07-31 23:51 ` [PATCH v4 07/15] commoncap: " Kees Cook
2017-07-31 23:51 ` [PATCH v4 08/15] commoncap: Move cap_elevated calculation into bprm_set_creds Kees Cook
2017-08-01 13:46 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-07-31 23:51 ` [PATCH v4 09/15] LSM: drop bprm_secureexec hook Kees Cook
2017-07-31 23:51 ` [PATCH v4 10/15] exec: Use secureexec for setting dumpability Kees Cook
2017-08-01 0:48 ` James Morris
2017-07-31 23:51 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2017-08-01 0:50 ` [PATCH v4 11/15] exec: Use secureexec for clearing pdeath_signal James Morris
2017-07-31 23:51 ` [PATCH v4 12/15] smack: Remove redundant pdeath_signal clearing Kees Cook
2017-08-01 0:50 ` James Morris
2017-08-01 15:24 ` Casey Schaufler
2017-07-31 23:51 ` [PATCH v4 13/15] exec: Consolidate dumpability logic Kees Cook
2017-07-31 23:51 ` [PATCH v4 14/15] exec: Use sane stack rlimit under secureexec Kees Cook
2017-07-31 23:51 ` [PATCH v4 15/15] exec: Consolidate pdeath_signal clearing Kees Cook
2017-08-01 0:52 ` James Morris
2017-08-01 0:34 ` [PATCH v4 00/15] exec: Use sane stack rlimit under secureexec Kees Cook
2017-08-01 0:54 ` James Morris
2017-08-01 3:03 ` Kees Cook
2017-08-01 5:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-08-01 5:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-08-01 15:04 ` Kees Cook
2017-08-01 20:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-08-01 21:04 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1501545093-56634-12-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=james.l.morris@oracle.com \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).