From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ima-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/6] libfs: define simple_read_iter_from_buffer
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 07:00:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1502967617.21278.68.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1708171241420.10905@namei.org>
On Thu, 2017-08-17 at 12:42 +1000, James Morris wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Aug 2017, Mimi Zohar wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2017-08-16 at 08:35 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Looks good,
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> >
> > Thank you for the reviewed-by's.
> >
> > Up to now I haven't been removing the Changelog before sending James a
> > pull request. Adding the dashes in the commit itself, only changes
> > how the patches are applied by others to their local branch, not to
> > what would be upstreamed. Am I suppose to be removing the changelog
> > before sending a pull request?
>
> I don't really understand this, but leave the changelog in?
Christoph had commented that the "---" should be before the Changelog,
not afterwards, so that git-am skips them. The changelog is needed by
reviewers, but once upstreamed it isn't really needed any more. Based
on Christph's response (offline), any information in the changelog
that is still useful, should move into the commit description itself
or code.
Mimi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-17 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-15 14:43 [PATCH v6 0/6] define new fs integrity_read method Mimi Zohar
2017-08-15 14:43 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] libfs: define simple_read_iter_from_buffer Mimi Zohar
2017-08-16 6:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-16 17:43 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-08-17 2:42 ` James Morris
2017-08-17 11:00 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2017-08-22 10:04 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2017-08-15 14:43 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] efivarfs: replaces the read file operation with read_iter Mimi Zohar
2017-08-16 6:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-15 14:43 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] ima: always measure and audit files in policy Mimi Zohar
2017-08-22 10:05 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2017-08-22 12:54 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-08-15 14:43 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] ima: use fs method to read integrity data Mimi Zohar
2017-08-16 13:17 ` Jan Kara
2017-08-16 17:43 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-08-22 10:09 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2017-08-28 4:13 ` Al Viro
2017-08-28 18:30 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-08-15 14:43 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] ima: define "dont_failsafe" policy action rule Mimi Zohar
2017-08-22 10:07 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2017-08-22 12:54 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-08-22 13:31 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2017-08-15 14:43 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] ima: define "fs_unsafe" builtin policy Mimi Zohar
2017-08-22 10:07 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2017-08-22 13:13 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-08-22 13:41 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2017-08-16 2:43 ` [PATCH v6 0/6] define new fs integrity_read method James Morris
2017-08-16 6:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-16 9:52 ` James Morris
2017-08-16 11:05 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-08-28 4:18 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1502967617.21278.68.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ima-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@google.com \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).