From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org, jack@suse.cz, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 09/12] writeback: move nr_pages == 0 logic to one location
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 14:13:56 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1506543239-31470-10-git-send-email-axboe@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1506543239-31470-1-git-send-email-axboe@kernel.dk>
Now that we have no external callers of wb_start_writeback(), we
can shuffle the passing in of 'nr_pages'. Everybody passes in 0
at this point, so just kill the argument and move the dirty
count retrieval to that function.
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Tested-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index 571a5702b568..d9be3dc34302 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -933,8 +933,19 @@ static void bdi_split_work_to_wbs(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
#endif /* CONFIG_CGROUP_WRITEBACK */
-static void wb_start_writeback(struct bdi_writeback *wb, long nr_pages,
- bool range_cyclic, enum wb_reason reason)
+/*
+ * Add in the number of potentially dirty inodes, because each inode
+ * write can dirty pagecache in the underlying blockdev.
+ */
+static unsigned long get_nr_dirty_pages(void)
+{
+ return global_node_page_state(NR_FILE_DIRTY) +
+ global_node_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS) +
+ get_nr_dirty_inodes();
+}
+
+static void wb_start_writeback(struct bdi_writeback *wb, bool range_cyclic,
+ enum wb_reason reason)
{
struct wb_writeback_work *work;
@@ -954,7 +965,7 @@ static void wb_start_writeback(struct bdi_writeback *wb, long nr_pages,
}
work->sync_mode = WB_SYNC_NONE;
- work->nr_pages = nr_pages;
+ work->nr_pages = wb_split_bdi_pages(wb, get_nr_dirty_pages());
work->range_cyclic = range_cyclic;
work->reason = reason;
work->auto_free = 1;
@@ -1814,17 +1825,6 @@ static struct wb_writeback_work *get_next_work_item(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
return work;
}
-/*
- * Add in the number of potentially dirty inodes, because each inode
- * write can dirty pagecache in the underlying blockdev.
- */
-static unsigned long get_nr_dirty_pages(void)
-{
- return global_node_page_state(NR_FILE_DIRTY) +
- global_node_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS) +
- get_nr_dirty_inodes();
-}
-
static long wb_check_background_flush(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
{
if (wb_over_bg_thresh(wb)) {
@@ -1951,7 +1951,7 @@ void wb_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
* write back the whole world.
*/
static void __wakeup_flusher_threads_bdi(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
- long nr_pages, enum wb_reason reason)
+ enum wb_reason reason)
{
struct bdi_writeback *wb;
@@ -1959,17 +1959,14 @@ static void __wakeup_flusher_threads_bdi(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
return;
list_for_each_entry_rcu(wb, &bdi->wb_list, bdi_node)
- wb_start_writeback(wb, wb_split_bdi_pages(wb, nr_pages),
- true, reason);
+ wb_start_writeback(wb, true, reason);
}
void wakeup_flusher_threads_bdi(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
enum wb_reason reason)
{
- long nr_pages = get_nr_dirty_pages();
-
rcu_read_lock();
- __wakeup_flusher_threads_bdi(bdi, nr_pages, reason);
+ __wakeup_flusher_threads_bdi(bdi, reason);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
@@ -1979,7 +1976,6 @@ void wakeup_flusher_threads_bdi(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
void wakeup_flusher_threads(enum wb_reason reason)
{
struct backing_dev_info *bdi;
- long nr_pages;
/*
* If we are expecting writeback progress we must submit plugged IO.
@@ -1987,11 +1983,9 @@ void wakeup_flusher_threads(enum wb_reason reason)
if (blk_needs_flush_plug(current))
blk_schedule_flush_plug(current);
- nr_pages = get_nr_dirty_pages();
-
rcu_read_lock();
list_for_each_entry_rcu(bdi, &bdi_list, bdi_list)
- __wakeup_flusher_threads_bdi(bdi, nr_pages, reason);
+ __wakeup_flusher_threads_bdi(bdi, reason);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-27 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-27 20:13 [PATCH 0/12 v3] Writeback improvements Jens Axboe
2017-09-27 20:13 ` [PATCH 01/12] buffer: have alloc_page_buffers() use __GFP_NOFAIL Jens Axboe
2017-09-28 14:08 ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-10-02 15:02 ` Jan Kara
2017-09-27 20:13 ` [PATCH 02/12] buffer: grow_dev_page() should use __GFP_NOFAIL for all cases Jens Axboe
2017-09-28 14:11 ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-09-28 18:12 ` Jens Axboe
2017-10-03 12:10 ` Jan Kara
2017-10-03 12:25 ` Jan Kara
2017-10-03 14:36 ` Jens Axboe
2017-10-03 15:52 ` Jan Kara
2017-09-27 20:13 ` [PATCH 03/12] buffer: eliminate the need to call free_more_memory() in __getblk_slow() Jens Axboe
2017-09-28 14:12 ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-10-03 12:22 ` Jan Kara
2017-09-27 20:13 ` [PATCH 04/12] fs: kill 'nr_pages' argument from wakeup_flusher_threads() Jens Axboe
2017-09-27 20:13 ` [PATCH 05/12] writeback: switch wakeup_flusher_threads() to cyclic writeback Jens Axboe
2017-10-03 12:43 ` Jan Kara
2017-09-27 20:13 ` [PATCH 06/12] writeback: provide a wakeup_flusher_threads_bdi() Jens Axboe
2017-09-27 20:13 ` [PATCH 07/12] writeback: pass in '0' for nr_pages writeback in laptop mode Jens Axboe
2017-09-27 20:13 ` [PATCH 08/12] writeback: make wb_start_writeback() static Jens Axboe
2017-09-27 20:13 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2017-09-27 20:13 ` [PATCH 10/12] writeback: only allow one inflight and pending full flush Jens Axboe
2017-09-28 21:41 ` Andrew Morton
2017-09-28 21:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-09-29 0:17 ` Jens Axboe
2017-09-29 5:21 ` Amir Goldstein
2017-10-03 16:06 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-10-03 16:11 ` Jens Axboe
2017-10-03 17:03 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-09-29 0:15 ` Jens Axboe
2017-09-27 20:13 ` [PATCH 11/12] writeback: make sync_inodes_sb() use range cyclic writeback Jens Axboe
2017-09-27 20:13 ` [PATCH 12/12] writeback: kill off ->range_cycle option Jens Axboe
2017-09-27 20:22 ` Jens Axboe
2017-09-28 13:19 ` [PATCH 0/12 v3] Writeback improvements John Stoffel
2017-09-28 13:39 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1506543239-31470-10-git-send-email-axboe@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).