From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Mateusz Guzik To: Eric Dumazet , Al Viro Cc: mszeredi@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 0/2] minor fd cleanup Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 12:58:13 +0200 Message-Id: <1507028295-9353-1-git-send-email-mguzik@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: The first patch is a super minor nit and I'm fine with it being ignored. Second patch is imho of actual value. fd_install has an avoidable requirement to be called in a sleepable context. It matters e.g. in rhel7 to where the patch was recently backported and the new requirement could not be enforced. I don't see any benefits from sleeping over locking and not sleeping makes the function slightly nicer. Mateusz Guzik (2): vfs: stop clearing close on exec when closing a fd vfs: grab the lock instead of blocking in __fd_install during resizing Documentation/filesystems/porting | 4 ---- fs/file.c | 12 +++++++----- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) -- 1.8.3.1